------------------------------------------------------------------- Hemp Web TV Videos Added, ABC's 'Pot Of Gold' And More (Oregon Cannabis Tax Act Posts Real-Time Movies At World Wide Web Site, Including US Government's 'Hemp For Victory') From: "D. Paul Stanford"To: "'DRCtalk list'" Subject: hemp web tv video's added, ABC's "Pot of Gold" & more Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 01:24:32 -0800 Organization: CRRH (PAC) Encoding: 41 TEXT Many new streaming video's have just been added to our web site at http://www.crrh.org/video.html . These are ABC's "Pot of Gold," the 1943 US Govt. WW II film, "Hemp for Victory," an early 1996 video about "San Francisco's Cannabis Buyer's Club," Portland, Oregon's KATU-TV show on medical marijuana, "Town Hall," and 2 of our political committee's weekly TV series, "Cannabis Common Sense." These streaming videos are viewable in real-time, on demand, for free by anyone with a 28.8 modem or faster. The first two of our 30 minute weekly TV shows, "Cannabis Common Sense," that we have put on our web page are our 38th and 39th shows. CCS-38 feature's Diane Densmore, the director of the busted 'Alternative Health Center,' Portland's cannabis buyers club, and her attorney, Lee Berger. They talk about the situation surrounding the Portland Police persecution of these patients, their organization and this courageous lady. CCS-39 feature's Dave Olson, producer of the film "The Hempen Road," with an extensive clip from the film. All of our 44 and growing list of "Cannabis Common Sense" shows will be digitized and available for free on demand on our web site soon. We will be adding many more videos soon, including CNN's special report "Higher Times," the entire film "Reefer Madness" (we have a neat clip of it up on our web site now,) a 1991 PBS series "The 90's" episode, "A Look At Hemp," and much more. Turn on (your computer,) tune in (frequently,) don't drop out (take over.) http://www.crrh.org/video.html - Hemp Web TV, from CRRH Sincerely yours, D. Paul Stanford Campaign for the Restoration and Regulation of Hemp CRRH P.O. Box 86741 Portland, OR 97286 Phone:(503) 235-4606 Fax:(503) 235-0120 Web: http://www.crrh.org/ *** From: "D. Paul Stanford" Reply-To: "stanford@crrh.org" To: "'Restore Hemp!'" Subject: Hemp Web TV Date: Sat, 14 Feb 1998 15:27:16 -0800 Organization: CRRH Following are 28 videos concerning cannabis and the drug war that are free for downloading on demand on CRRH's Hemp Web TV. Most of these videos stream in real time, meaning you can watch them like television, with hours of factual documentation and fascinating cannabis-related content. In the past day we have improved our video-streaming capability so the Real Player and Microsoft's Netshow will support up to 60 viewers at a time, and the first 19 videos listed below are encoded in "Real Video" suitable for a 28.8 K or faster modem. Free video plug-in players for your web browser are linked from Hemp Web TV, at http://www.crrh.org/video.html . More videos will be placed on Hemp Web TV on a continuing basis, so the following line-up of video programs will grow and evolve. Campaign for the Restoration and Regulation of Hemp's home page is http://www.crrh.org These videos are all available at http://www.crrh.org/video.html 1. 60 Minutes' report on Cannabis in the Netherlands & the USA, with Morley Safer, 13 minutes 2. CNN's "Higher Times" with Bernard Shaw, 50 minutes. 3. ABC's "Pot of Gold" show with Peter Jennings, 48 minutes. 4. Dr. Andrew Weil on drug policy at Harvard's Zinberg Awards in Oct.'96, 55 minutes. 5. Oregon legislature almost recriminalizes cannabis & Woody Harrelson wins industrial hemp court case. 6. The US Govt.'s 1943 film, "Hemp for Victory," 14 minutes. 7. PBS series "The 90's" with "A Look at Hemp" from 1991, 1 hour 8. YIPPIE! "Smoke-In: The Movement to Legalize Marijuana" compiled in 1977, 20 minutes. 9. ABC's Nightline, with Forest Sawyer and NEJM editor on 2/3/97, 26 minutes. 10. US Judiciary Comm. testimony of Marvin Cohen of Arizona on medical marijuana. 11. Portland KATU-TV's "Town Hall" on medical cannabis, 1/12/97, 1 hour. 12. Portland KATU's "Town Hall" on the Oregon Cannabis Tax Act, 12/28/97, 5 minutes 13. "San Francisco's Cannabis Buyer's Club" in early 1996, 30 minutes. 14. "Dennis Miller Live," from HBO, Jan. 1998, with Bill Maher on legalization of drugs, 30 minutes. 15. Portland's KGW-TV, police say marijuana growers provide "job security" for law enforcement, 3 minutes. 16. Portland, KGW-TV's 2 part report on medical marijuana and Portland Alternative Health Center, Feb.24 & 25, 1997, 10 minutes. 17. Portland, KATU-TV' News examines the Alternative Health Center and say police raid pending, July, 1997, 2 minutes. 18. CRRH's own series, "Cannabis Common Sense" show 38, Jan. 1998, with Paul Loney and Paul Stanford as hosts. This episode features Diane Densmore of Portland, Oregon's busted Alternative Heath Center, and her attorney, Lee Berger. 30 minutes. 19. CRRH's own series, "Cannabis Common Sense" show 39, Jan. 1998, with Paul Loney and Paul Stanford as hosts. This episode features, Dave Olsen, the producer, writer of the new documentary, "The Hempen Road." We play a 7 minute clips from "The Hempen Road." 30 minutes. 20. CNN's October 12. 1997 feature on Hemp BC and Vancouver, Canada, 12 minutes. 21. Portland KATU-TV's Telepoll Showing OCTA Can Pass, OCTA poll wins with 54+%, 1 minute. 22. Portland's KGW-TV, Dr. George Robins, Oregon Medical Association past president, supports OCTA, 1 minute. 23. 1937 Movie Clip, Reefer Madness, showing the lies used to prohibit, 30 seconds. 24. Portland KATU-TV's News clip explaining OCTA, 1 minute. 25. CNBC's Market Wrap, D. Paul Stanford, CRRH Director, on NBC about Industrial Hemp and Paper in China, 30 seconds 26. CNBC's Market Wrap, Industrial hemp prohibition in USA , 30 seconds. 27. CNBC's Market Wrap, D. Paul Stanford's company featured on CNBC, 30 seconds. 28. Portland KGW-TV's News clip of 10 seconds where a marijuana-plant-toting deputy tells us, "I'd like to thank the marijuana growers for my job security. I really appreciate that." Turn on (your computer,) tune in (frequently,) don't drop out (take over.) More coming soon. Thanks! Campaign for the Restoration and Regulation of Hemp CRRH P.O. Box 86741 Portland, OR 97286 Phone:(503) 235-4606 Fax:(503) 235-0120 Web: http://www.crrh.org/
------------------------------------------------------------------- Sniff And Grab ('Willamette Week' Article About 'Knock And Talk' Tactics Used By Portland Marijuana Task Force That Resulted In Shooting Death Of Officer During Warrantless Break-In) Willamette Week Portland, Oregon February 11, 1998 http://www.wweek.com/ letters to editor: mzusman@wweek.com Crime & Justice column - "Sniff and Grab" http://www.wweek.com/html/grab021198.html Context: The Washington Supreme Court recently ruled that it's illegal for police to gather information on an individual's electric usage without a warrant. Knock and talk is used mostly for marijuana investigations, but similar techniques are used in other cases. For example, officers routinely stop people on the street and, if they look suspicious, sometimes ask for consent to search them. According to the Drugs and Vice Division's 1996 Annual Report, "That marijuana production is being conducted by such a cross section of supposedly respectable citizens is an indication that marijuana enforcement has been too long neglected." SNIFF and GRAB Tactics used by the police bureau's Marijuana Task Force frustrate local defense lawyers. BY MAUREEN O'HAGAN mohagan@wweek.com For a six-person team that is responsible for more drug investigations than any other unit in the Portland Police Bureau, the Marijuana Task Force hasn't received much public attention. Until now. Since Steven Dons allegedly shot two members of the task force and killed another officer during a marijuana investigation late last month, the tiny unit has come under increased scrutiny. Defense lawyers say it's about time. "I've been on the case of the Marijuana Task Force for three years now," says Jenny Cooke, a Portland defense lawyer. "I feel like I've been howling in the wilderness." Cooke and others acknowledge that by criticizing the task force, they're putting themselves in a tough spot. They don't want to appear callous to the death of a Portland cop, but they're also eager to publicize what they see as real problems with the bureau's efforts to target marijuana growers. Their argument isn't that the cops are unprofessional cowboys who routinely break the law to make busts. Quite the contrary: Many members of the defense bar say the pot squad's officers are among the most professional on the entire force. Instead, the loudest complaint is that, thanks to ingenious police tactics and the peculiarities of the pot-growing business, the task force has it too easy--something the Drugs and Vice Division's annual report confirms. "Growers in this region present a target rich environment and are there for the taking as fast as the task force can get to them," the most recent report reads. In 1996, the most recent year for which statistics are available, the Drugs and Vice Division seized a whopping 14,425 marijuana plants. The task force is able to seize so much pot because each investigation is relatively simple. First, the cops develop a suspicion someone is growing marijuana. Sometimes they get the information from a neighbor or from a drug suspect who wants to turn over evidence to reduce his own charges. Other times, they're more clever. According to defense lawyers who have questioned task force members, the police have staked out American Agriculture, a store that sells high-tech growing equipment that police suspect is not intended for raising broccoli in your basement. The task force then gets the address of the buyer either by following him home or tracking his license plate number. Next, the cops check with PGE to see if the home has unusual electric bills. Defense lawyers claim that their clients lose no matter what the police find. "If you have high power usage, they use that as evidence of a marijuana grow," Cooke says. "If you have low power usage, it means you're stealing electricity, and that's evidence of a marijuana grow." Armed with little more than a suspicion, task force members then stop by the house. If the person isn't home, they sometimes look around for evidence. Courts have ruled that in some circumstances, the police can walk into a backyard as long as it's not fenced in and may also peer in windows. If the person is home, they conduct a "knock and talk." In this technique, officers simply knock on the door and ask if they can come in and look around. That was the plan in the Dons case. The only problem was, he allegedly began destroying the evidence, which gave police enough cause to break down the door and enter the home without a warrant. Don's actions, however, were highly unusual. Typically the suspect allows officers to enter his home--even if he has pot plants growing in his basement. Judges nationwide have upheld the knock-and-talk technique; its defenders say cops have as much right to ring your doorbell as cookie-toting Girls Scouts. Defense lawyers say it's inherently coercive, noting that Girl Scouts aren't usually wearing a badge or carrying a gun. Police visits "can be very intimidating without being illegal," says defense lawyer Lisa Maxfield, noting that most people don't know that they can slam the door in the cops' faces. Some of Maxfield's clients describe a procedure which more accurately could be described as a "walk and talk." "They'll be walking through the door at the same time as they're saying, 'May we come in?'" she says. "They come in with their badges flashing. It's not really consent." When the suspect doesn't give consent to enter the home, the police try to sway them by explaining that they'll simply apply for a warrant instead, implying that this will make things more difficult for both the police and the suspect. Their language can be very nuanced, according to Deputy District Attorney Mark McDonnell. For example, the difference between a cop saying "I'm going to get a search warrant" and "I'm going to apply for a search warrant" can make or break a case, because the former is considered unlawful coercion. "The police are very specific in what they say and are very careful," says McDonnell, who heads the drug unit. "If it's coercive, it's illegal. But there are times when people interpret what police are saying as a threat." Even if task force members aren't able to persuade suspects to let them in, they can use the knock and talk to their benefit--by using their nose. Unlike most other drugs, marijuana has a strong smell. Oftentimes, officers say they get a whiff of growing marijuana when the suspect opens the door--a claim many defense lawyers question. "Any defense attorney in this town will tell you these guys can smell dope in places no other man can smell dope," says defense lawyer Michelle Burrows. That smell is important. First, the odor gives officers enough evidence to make an arrest without a warrant--as long as the person is outside his or her house. According to defense lawyer Bruce Howlett, the cops have developed tricky tactics to get suspects out the door, like offering business cards. When the suspect reaches out to take the card, the officer can grab his arm, yank him out the door and place him under arrest. "That's what I call the 'sniff and grab' technique," says Howlett. Even if the suspect doesn't leave his house, the odor of growing marijuana helps officers make their bust anyway. In most cases, the smell alone is enough for a judge to issue a search warrant, which allows police to enter a home without consent. This is particularly galling to defense lawyers. "Most of the time, there's no way to contest this sniff stuff," says defense lawyer Maxfield. "Unless you can prove this officer is a big fat liar, there's not a court in the state that's going to say this officer is lying. We get frustrated that there's not a way to test someone's factual assertion." In some cases, however, defense lawyers have persuaded judges to rule in their favor. Once, for example, Maxfield was able to prove that the marijuana that police smelled didn't come from her clients' house but from the clothes of officers who dismantled another grow earlier that day. The charges were dismissed. But most of the time, the marijuana defendant winds up losing. In some ways, the police end up losing some public support, as well. Defense lawyers frequently argue that police tactics are unfair. When those tactics are applied in investigating child molesters, gun runners and robbers, the claims don't get much sympathy. With the Marijuana Task Force, they have a bit more resonance because the cops are going after pot growers, whom most people perceive as harmless. "The controversy here is that a large segment of the population is very ambivalent about marijuana in general," says McDonnell. "The problem is: It's illegal to grow pot. That's a legislative decision. Critics are asking us to ignore the decision of the legislature, but it's our responsibility to carry out the law."
------------------------------------------------------------------- Follow-Up - Costly Intentions ('Willamette Week' Says Portland Lawyer Michael S. Morey Has Filed Notice Of Intent To Sue Oregon State Department Of Corrections On Behalf Of Four Of 78 Women Transferred To Private Arizona Prison Who Say They Were Sexually Assaulted By Guards Employed By Corrections Corporation Of America)Willamette Week Portland, Oregon Feb. 11, 1998 http://www.wweek.com/ letters to editor: mzusman@wweek.com Follow-up - Costly Intentions The state Department of Corrections' decision to transfer 78 female inmates to a privately run Arizona prison may end up costing more than expected. Late last month, Portland lawyer Michael S. Morey filed a notice of intent to sue the department on behalf of four of those women, who say they were sexually assaulted while incarcerated at the Corrections Corporation of America facility. Morey's notice says the department could be liable if it failed to properly monitor the Arizona prison or quickly respond to the inmates' claims. But he hopes he doesn't have to go after the state coffers. "My focus is not the state of Oregon. It is the Corrections Corporation of America people," he told WW, saying he also plans to sue the Tennessee-based company. The clients--Barrilee Bannister, Victoria Simms, Christine Foos and Stephanie Russell--say that several CCA guards began sexual relationships with them last spring. Although only one woman claims she was forcibly raped, the rest say they felt coerced after guards slipped them marijuana and then threatened to search their cells ("Private Affairs," WW, Oct. 22, 1997). Morey agrees that the atmosphere at the Arizona prison was coercive. "I think prisoners should be treated like prisoners," he told WW. "These people were treated like sexual pieces of meat." After an investigation, the state Department of Corrections determined that the women's claims were legitimate and transferred them back home to Oregon. -MO [Maureen O'Hagan]
------------------------------------------------------------------- Confront Youth Drug Problem ('Bulletin' In Bend, Oregon, Doesn't Have Any New Ideas About What To Do About Scourge Of Illegal Drugs It Finds, But Says We Should Do More Anyway) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 1998 19:36:15 -0800 To: mapnews@mapinc.org From: Olafur BrentmarSubject: MN: US OR: Confront Youth Drug Problem Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Newshawk: Curt Wagoner Pubdate: 11 Feb 1998 Source: The Bulletin Page: # A-6 Contact: bulletin@bendbulletin.com Website: http://www.bendbulletin.com CONFRONT YOUTH DRUG PROBLEM Let's face up to it: Central Oregon is losing the war on youth drug abuse. "Wasted," a recent two part series by Bulletin reporters Greg Bolt and Jeff Nielson, should serve as a wakeup call that drugs and alcohol are too casually accepted, widely available and frequently used among our young people. Combating these trends will require a stronger community effort in prevention, enforcement and treatment. But first it will require all the involved people- educators, law enforcement and health professionals, and parents- to fully confront the drug problem. The grim statistics and anecdotes presented in the articles that appeared Sunday and Monday are especially disturbing in a region that prides itself as a great place to raise kids. In Deschutes County, a 1996 survey among eighth and 11th graders, showed use of marijuana and alcohol were higher than the state average. Almost one out of five of the middle schoolers surveyed and one out of four of the juniors reported having smoked pot in the previous month. While the same survey wasn't done in Crook and Jefferson counties, few would dispute that there is a real problem in more rural communities. It would also be unfair to say that Central Oregon is in total denial about the youth drug problem. There are more treatment education programs in place today than a decade ago and better cooperation between schools and law enforcement. But with the overwhelming evidence staring us in the face, we must admit we maybe underestimating the problem and what needs to be done to stop it. The front line has to be enforcement and a strict no-tolerance policy toward drugs. It's telling that while reports of widespread drug availability in schools abound, there are few drug-related disciplinary cases at local high schools and middle schools. Does that mean drug sales aren't happening in the parking lot or that kids aren't coming to school stoned? Any ninth-grader will tell you a different story. Local schools and law enforcement agencies need to take a hard look at what they are doing to actively seek out and expose drug users and dealers. It's time to look at putting police officers in all our schools, as done in La Pine and Jefferson and Crook counties, as both a deterrent and a resource. It's also time to consider enforcement measures like sweep searches of lockers and school grounds. We know by know that a " get tough " policy alone won't solve the problem. There are a variety of education and treatment programs already in place. We need to evaluate whether these are working or not, scrap the ones that don't and expand those that do. Of course, the ultimate responsibility for the behavior of our children rests not with school and law enforcement authorities or peers, but with the parents and families. The words and actions of parents can from a very early age make all the difference about whether kids can resist outside pressure. Active involment in teen-agers lives can make sure they stay out of trouble. There are no easy answers or single approaches that will make this problem go away overnight. But we can do a better and we must do better.
------------------------------------------------------------------- Call Yamaguchi (Group Letter To Editor Of 'San Francisco Bay Guardian' Urges Readers To Call US Attorney Michael Yamaguchi At 415-436-7200 To Protest Lawsuit Against Northern California Medical Marijuana Dispensaries - 'A Clear Danger To Those In Need') Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 01:22:20 -0800 To: mapnews@mapinc.org From: Olafur BrentmarSubject: MN: US CA: PUB LTE: Call Yamaguchi Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Newshawk: "Frank S. World" Pubdate: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 Source: San Francisco Bay Guardian Website: http://www.sfbg.com Contact: letters@sfbg.com. CALL YAMAGUCHI We believe that the action of the U.S. government in seeking an injunction to halt the sale of medical marijuana to approved patients is a travesty. It blindly places strict adherence to the letter of the federal law above the need for compassion and understanding. U.S. Attorney Michael Yamaguchi has filed suit against six cannabis buyers' clubs, declaring that the will of California voters in enacting the Compassionate Use Act of 1996 is pre-empted by federal law that bars the use of marijuana for anything other than research. It is absurd to continue to categorize marijuana as a Schedule 1 Controlled Substance, limited only to research use (along with cocaine, heroin, and methamphetamines), and to ignore its therapeutic value. But beyond that, Yamaguchi's actions show a callous disregard for the plight of those who seek relief from pain and suffering through the purchase of marijuana from supervised facilities. Before he pursues these actions, we urge him to visit some of the cannabis buyers' clubs and talk to their patients so that he may witness firsthand the many beneficial effects that the medically approved use of cannabis offers to those in distress. Yamaguchi's pursuit of an injunction presents a clear danger to those in need, as does California Attorney General Dan Lungren's continual harassment of medical caregivers. These caregivers provide a service to the sick and disabled that a majority of Californians have said that they want; a service that is unavailable through other legal means. The mere fact that the law defines "primary caregivers" as individuals does not, in our opinion, preclude the use of clubs or groups from dispensing medical marijuana. We also are outraged that Lungren has scorned the will of Californians by failing to work with the legislature and the clubs to pursue methods by which cannabis can be distributed under controlled conditions to those obtaining a doctor's approval. Rather than seeking the closure of the clubs, Lungren would better serve the public by working with the clubs to ensure that their aid would be limited only to those in medical need. We urge those who are opposed to these actions to make their voices heard by writing Michael Yamaguchi at the U.S. Attorney's Office, 450 Golden Gate, San Francisco 94102, or telephoning his office at (415) 436-7200, or by contacting their federal and state representatives. KENNETH KOVITZ, JERRY GOFFE, JANET GOODMAN, PAUL WINGATE San Francisco LESLIE CARROLL, KAREN SANDERS Mill Valley HELEN WENTZ, ED SABRACK, ED ADELMAN, GAIL MITCHELL San Rafael
------------------------------------------------------------------- Pot Club Trial To Remain In Oakland ('San Francisco Chronicle' Version Of Yesterday's News About Dennis Peron's Trial) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 13:05:58 -0800 To: mapnews@mapinc.org From: jwjohnson@netmagic.net (Joel W. Johnson) Subject: MN: US CA: Pot Club Trial To Remain In Oakland Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Reply-To: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Newshawk: "Frank S. World"Source: San Francisco Chronicle Contact: chronletters@sfgate.com Website: http://www.sfgate.com/chronicle/ Pubdate: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 POT CLUB TRIAL TO REMAIN IN OAKLAND A federal appeals court has struck down a request by Cannabis Cultivators Club owner Dennis Peron to move a marijuana sales and possession trial from Alameda County to San Francisco. The trial -- now pending -- resulted from indictments issued against Peron and several other medical marijuana advocates following an Aug. 24, 1996, raid on the San Francisco club by state agents. California Attorney General Dan Lungren chose to prosecute Peron in Oakland, stating some of the crimes occurred in Alameda County. Peron said Lungren's move was designed to find jurors sympathetic to prosecutors. Attorney general's office spokesman Matt Ross said the decision by the First District Court of Appeals in San Francisco to keep the trial in Oakland is appropriate ``because some of the overt acts occurred in Alameda County.'' Peron said he is unconcerned about the denial of the change of venue request because he expects to be acquitted of all charges. ``The people of Alameda County are not going to convict someone for selling medicine to sick and dying people,'' he said.
------------------------------------------------------------------- Pot Advocate Peron Faces Trial In Oakland (Three-Paragraph Version In 'San Francisco Examiner') Date: Thu, 12 Feb 1998 13:58:30 -0800 To: mapnews@mapinc.org From: jwjohnson@netmagic.net (Joel W. Johnson) Subject: MN: US CA: Pot Advocate Peron Faces Trial in Oakland Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Newshawk: "Frank S. World"Source: San Francisco Examiner Contact: letters@examiner.com Website: http://www.examiner.com Pubdate: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 POT ADVOCATE PERON FACES TRIAL IN OAKLAND San Francisco Gubernatorial candidate Dennis Peron, the state's most prominent medical marijuana advocate, will have to fight criminal charges on drug sales in Oakland. In a ruling made public Tuesday, the 1st District Court of Appeal overturned an Alameda County judge's decision to transfer the trial to San Francisco, where Peron's marijuana club operates. Peron, founder of the organization now called the Cannabis Cultivators Club, criticized the ruling but said he would accept it.
------------------------------------------------------------------- Street Ministry ('San Francisco Examiner' Portrays River Sims, Anglican Priest And 'Temenos Catholic Worker' Who Tends To San Francisco's Homeless, Junkies, And Sex Workers) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 1998 14:03:23 -0800 To: mapnews@mapinc.org From: jwjohnson@netmagic.net (Joel W. Johnson) Subject: MN: US CA: Street Ministry Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Newshawk: "Frank S. World"Source: San Francisco Examiner Contact: letters@examiner.com Website: http://www.examiner.com Pubdate: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 Author: Craig Marine of the Examiner Staff STREET MINISTRY FATHER CHRISTIAN RIVER SIMS TENDS TO THE CITY'S HOMELESS, JUNKIES AND SEX WORKERS, BUT "A LOT OF PEOPLE . . . VIEW ME AS THE DEVIL HIMSELF' The way River Sims tells his horror stories, calmly, barely raising his voice, poised like the Anglican priest he is, makes them seem all the more ugly by contrast. For instance there's this kid - a teenager - who ventures back and forth between Haight Street and the Polk, living on the streets. No one can get him to even try staying in a shelter. "He's third-generation homeless," says Sims, speaking in tones members of Old San Francisco might use to speak of their lineage. "His mother shot him up with heroin for the first time when he was 8 years old." Then there was another boy - young man, whatever - who came back to his Polk Street buddies bragging that he had just made $200 from a john and hadn't even had to perform a sex act. "All he had to do was let the guy carve up his back with a knife," recalls Sims. "He thought he had really gotten over." Sims - Father Christian River Sims, born Michael Smith in Missouri 41 years ago - has been working with San Francisco's homeless, junkies and sex workers, primarily in the Polk, Haight and Civic Center areas, for the past three years. He moved to The City after visiting a year earlier. He thought it would be the perfect place to establish his ministry, which he calls Temenos Catholic Worker (temenos is Greek for that which is abandoned, cut off or separated). The ministry is really just Sims, working out of a sparsely furnished one-bedroom apartment that is crammed with the things that he needs for his work. And watching Sims work is an eye-popping experience, day or night. It's high noon on Polk Street and Sims, dressed in his usual baggy jeans, sweatshirt with a cross on the breast and backward baseball cap, makes a left into Fern Alley. Immediately, a very buzzed, effeminate male pushing a shopping cart stops him in the middle of the street, barely three feet from bustling Polk. "Need points?" Sims asks simply, and there follows an endless speed riff response as the person pores through the cart, pulling hypodermic needles from nearly every conceivable spot and loading them into a plastic watering jug. "How many do you have?" asks Sims, as though this is the most common sight in the world. To him, it obviously is. "One hundred and fifty," is the answer and Sims calmly reaches into one of the overloaded canvas bags he carries around and counts out 150 syringes, "longs and shorts" in the parlance of the streets. The exchange made, Sims offers one of the dozens of sandwiches he spends two and a half hours a day making. The offer is rejected - not enough mayonnaise. Others will later be passed by for having too much mayo. There is not a whole lot of "thank you" going on here, though later people will exchange hugs with the priest and ask for nothing in return. Sims wanders off and explains that that may have been only two days worth of needles for the shopping cart person. He exchanges 2,000 needles a week, which he gets from the Prevention Point needle exchange program. He also distributes condoms, clothing - socks are a big draw with the rainy weather - and as much advice as people ask him for, about drug rehab or shelters or where the free showers are or anything else a street survivor might want to know. He never gives them money, so they don't ask. He won't let them crash in his apartment, but if he knows they are sleeping on the step in front, he might sneak down and cover them with a blanket. He'll buy them a soda or a slice of pizza. "I must have spent $8,000 on pizza the first year I was out here, trying to gain their trust," Sims laughs. He's serious, however. He survives on donations, gets food from the Food Bank, lives on less than $800 per month himself. It's his life, usually five or six nights a week, from 8 p.m. until 4 a.m. The boundaries he has set keep him sane. Night time on Polk is surreal. The neon from the fancy restaurants, bars, ice cream shops and liquor stores glows off the rain slick streets, reflecting into the faces of the boys trying to look languid perched against the walls, studying the cars that go by studying them. Everyone knows Sims. He knows all their stories. The faces of some of the young women who come over to grab needles or a sandwich - peanut butter and jelly this time - reveal some of what they have seen, minus the details. They are the same women whose pictures adorn the walls of Sims' tiny apartment, holding their babies like little angels just before the Child Protective Services takes the kids away. Babies having babies. One boy comes over and shows Sims a walking stick he's made. He's taken a cane and used leather strips from an abandoned easy chair to weave a pattern on the top, which he has adorned with a silver skull and a horned bull's head. The bottom three-quarters of the cane is covered with small pornographic photographs of every imaginable type. It may not be suitable for family viewing, but it is art. Naturally, it's stolen the next day. "He got his first job in San Jose when he was 13," Sims says of the cane boy as Sims walks on. "A woman paid him to take pornographic pictures of teenage girls. He's been obsessed with pornography ever since." The cops know what Sims is doing, but look the other way - it's one of those San Francisco things largely influenced by Mayor Brown, who said of needle exchange, "I wrote the law. I think it is a way in which to avoid the spread of AIDS - the best way. It has proven to be an accurate assumption through studies. The National Medical Association, C. Everett Koop, a whole bunch of people believe as I do." "I know I'm controversial," Sims shrugs. "A lot of people, mostly fundamentalists, view me as the devil himself. But that doesn't mean I'm going to stop doing this. This is the happiest I've ever been in my life. This is my calling." He says he's known of just five kids that have successfully left the streets since he's been out here. But as to why he would put so much effort into a seemingly endless and hopeless task. "I see God in their eyes." He smiles. "I see Jesus in every one of the people I see on the street."
------------------------------------------------------------------- Board Of Elections To Give Go Ahead For ACT UP's Medical Marijuana Initiative 59 - Competing Proposal From California Will Be Rejected (News Release From ACT UP Announces Start Of Signature Gathering Today In Washington, DC) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 12:25:45 EST Originator: drctalk@drcnet.org Sender: drctalk@drcnet.org From: VOTEYES57@aol.com To: Multiple recipients of listSubject: ACT UP Signature Drive begins/Californians to be rejected Board of Elections to give go ahead for ACT UP's medical marijuana Initiative 59 Competing proposal from California will be rejected for more information contact Steve Michael at 202-547-9404 Washington, DC -(February 11, 1998)- AIDS activists with the group ACT UP Washington will begin gathering signatures today for Initiative 59, "The Legalization of Marijuana for Medical Treatment Act of 1998". Initiative 59 is almost identical to activists' earlier effort, Initiative 57, which fell short by a minimum of 800 signatures last year. The measure protects seriously ill patients like persons with cancer and AIDS, if they use small amounts of marijuana to ease their suffering. At today's hearing of the Board of Elections and Ethics, the local activists complete their final procedure, and will be issued petition forms for Initiative 59. In order to place their proposal on the September, 1998 ballot, organizers will have to collect the signatures of 5% of the total number DC registered voters, approximately 17,000, by May 15. "We came so close last time," states Initiative 59 sponsor, ACT UP's Steve Michael, who is HIV+, "Our team of volunteers is ready to roll." The DC Board of Elections is expected to reject an opposing initiative filed by a public relations firm based in Santa Monica, California called Americans for Medical Rights. The California group, which is bank-rolled by billionaire financier George Soros, failed to file disclosure forms with the DC Office of Campaign Finance. Under DC Law, Initiative sponsors must submit within ten days of filing: a Statement of Organization, a disclosure report of Receipts and Expenditures, and a copy of the initiative text to the Office of Campaign Finance. If the Californians intend to compete with the local AIDS activists with a rival initiative, they will have to start all over again, with several months of proceedings before petition forms can be issued. "We will have Initiative 59 qualified for the ballot before the Californians can even begin." comments Michael. "It's clear that local efforts are the best chance to pass medical marijuana here in the District of Columbia. We're in this to win." DC organizers have already mobilized broad-based community support for the local medical marijuana proposal, including the support of DC top elected officials. "This ends the confusion of having two medical marijuana proposal circulating. We've already put in countless hours talking to tens of thousands of DC voters, and aren't about to have a group of high paid California consultants come and jeopardize our work." adds local AIDS activist Wayne Turner. Those wishing to volunteer, or make a contribution should contact ACT UP Washington at (202) 547-9404.
------------------------------------------------------------------- Group Shoots At Undercover Police Officers In West Side Neighborhood ('Milwaukee Journal Sentinel' Says Two Flee, Two Busted After Group Of People Fired At Fleeing Unmarked Squad Car Carrying Two Undercover Officers In Milwaukee Neighborhood Near Marquette University Where Drugs, Crime And Chaos Are Rife) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 12:32:06 -0800 To: mapnews@mapinc.org From: Olafur BrentmarSubject: MN: US WI: Group Shoots At Undercover Police Officers In West Side Neighborhood Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Newshawk: "Frank S. World" Pubdate: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 Source: Milwaukee Journal Sentinel Author: Jim Stingl and Jessica McBride Contact: jsedit@onwis.com Fax: (414) 224-8280 Website: http://www.jsonline.com/ GROUP SHOOTS AT UNDERCOVER POLICE OFFICERS IN WEST SIDE NEIGHBORHOOD Authorities fled after men approached car while they were on surveillance A group of people fired at a fleeing unmarked squad car carrying two undercover police officers Tuesday afternoon near N. 19th and W. State streets, shocking no one in this west side neighborhood near Marquette University where residents say drugs, crime and chaos are a fact of life. One of the bullets penetrated the vehicle but missed the officers. Police arrested two men. The tactical enforcement unit then converged on the home in which other suspects were believed to be hiding in the 900 block of N. 19th St. An hour later, SWAT officers left the three-story rooming house and announced that several people had been taken in for questioning. However, two men fled the scene. Police were looking for a Dodge Caravan painted three shades of blue. A police sniper stood on the roof of a building on the west campus of Sinai Samaritan Medical Center, 2000 W. Kilbourn Ave., almost directly behind the home from which the men fled. Police Lt. David Kane said the two officers had gone to the house to conduct surveillance as the result of a complaint. He declined to say whether it was a known drug house. A group of at least four people standing outside the house "converged" on the officers, Kane said. The officers identified themselves as police and started to drive away. That is when the shots were fired at their car. Bullets hit the car and an unoccupied car parked on the street, Kane said. Police recovered numerous shell casings from the street. No one was injured in the incident, which began about 2 p.m. The officers did not fire their weapons. Kane said no weapons or drugs were recovered from inside the house. The excitement drew a crowd, and police detoured traffic. Scott Tomter, who owns Badger Properties, 1824 W. State St., and rents to Marquette students, said he tells the students to avoid renting on 19th St. or even walking down that block. "Maybe this will wake somebody up, and they'll clean up this neighborhood. It's ridiculous. It's a college neighborhood and they allow this to go on," he said. Tomter stood on the street with a friend, Neal Berliant, and looked past the yellow police tape. "They ruined this neighborhood, the drug dealers. They took over," said Berliant, who for 21 years has owned Badger Beer Distributors, 1812 W. State St. Patrick Schill said he has delivered mail in this neighborhood for 17 years. "It's all crack cocaine, the whole block. If one ain't got it, they go next door. We've got to get that crap out of here," Schill said. A 41-year-old man who didn't want to give his name said he has lived in the area 25 years. He said that the house where the shooting happened is "a 24-hour place," where menacing people congregate outside. "They wanted to roll me for my money," he said. "You never let them get close to you."
------------------------------------------------------------------- Twenty Percent Of Adults Drink Heavily, Study Says ('Milwaukee Journal Sentinel' Says Researchers From University Of Wisconsin's Center For Addiction Research And Education Discovered Nearly 20 Percent Of Adults Living Within 100 Miles Of Madison - Including Milwaukee - Are Knocking Back So Many Drinks, Or Are Binge Drinking, They Are Considered At Risk For A Host Of Medical Problems) The findings surprised researchers from the University of Wisconsin's Center for Addiction Research and Education Date: Thu, 12 Feb 1998 13:52:10 -0800 To: mapnews@mapinc.org From: Olafur BrentmarSubject: MN: US WI: 20% Of Adults Drink Heavily, Study Says Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Newshawk: "Frank S. World" Pubdate: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 Source: Milwaukee Journal Sentinel Author: Neil D. Rosenberg of the Journal Sentinel Contact: jsedit@onwis.com Fax: (414) 224-8280 Website: http://www.jsonline.com/ 20% OF ADULTS DRINK HEAVILY, STUDY SAYS UW researches surprised at high concentration of at-risk drinkers within 100 miles of Madison Nearly 20% of adults living within 100 miles of Madison -- including Milwaukee -- are knocking back so many drinks, or are binge drinking, they are considered "at-risk" for a host of medical problems. The findings surprised researchers from the University of Wisconsin's Center for Addiction Research and Education and prompted them to urge physicians nationwide to take extra steps to ferret out such at-risk drinkers and work with them to curtail their drinking. The study was based on surveys voluntarily filled out by more than 19,000 patients of 89 physicians practicing in 22 clinics in the defined area. The study represents one of the few large-scale efforts to examine the drinking habits of patients belonging to community-based primary care clinics. The study, published in this month's American Journal of Public Health, found that 19.7% of adult patients ages 18 to 60 were "at-risk" drinkers, according to standards set by the National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. For men that meant 14 or more drinks in a week or a history of occasional binge drinking; for women that meant seven or more drinks a week or a binge-drinking history. The study defined binge drinking as six or more drinks at a single sitting. "I think that is pretty impressive," said Mary Dufour, deputy director of the institute, about the high number of at-risk drinkers. "We suspected it was that high, but people hadn't collected the data." Drinking at that level puts a person at higher risk for a wide variety of ailments and disorders including cirrhosis of the liver, stroke, high blood pressure, accidental injuries, domestic violence, sleeping disorders, depression, chronic headaches and more. The article points out that men who consume more than two ounces of liquor a day -- equivalent to approximately two beers or eight ounces of wine -- have 2.2 times the risk of liver cirrhosis than those who drink less. Women have an even higher risk. For daily drinkers of both sexes, for approximately every ounce of liquor, single beer or five ounces of wine consumed, there is a perceptible rise of roughly 1% to 2% in blood pressure. Michael F. Fleming, of the UW addiction center and principal investigator for the study, said that he was not only surprised by the high numbers, but "that (respondents) were so honest about their drinking habits." "There is a notion that most people do not want to tell their physician about how much they drink," he said in an interview. "But most people are willing to tell their level of use." Dufour said that although physicians are trained as students to ask questions about drinking history, as physicians "they are notoriously bad" in doing so. "This emphasizes again that alcohol is American's No. 1 drug of abuse and you have to ask every patient about it," she said. Fleming said the findings support tighter screening of patients for their drinking patterns. "You should ask 'how many days do you drink, what is the average number of drinks per drinking occasion and do you have four or more at a single time?' " he said. "Quantity, frequency and binge drinking, that's what you need to know." If an at-risk drinker is identified, the physician needs to devote at least some time to a serious discussion of the topic. Previous work by Fleming and his colleagues has shown that a 15-minute discussion -- a so-called brief intervention -- could reduce drinking by 30% or more in problem drinkers. Advice on how to cut down on drinking, booklets and other related resources can be used as well, he said. The article concludes that "since the majority of alcohol-related problems occur in at-risk non-dependent drinkers, public health policy must shift toward . . . focusing on the identification of this population."
------------------------------------------------------------------- Students Say Yes To Pot ('Associated Press' Says Use Of Cannabis And Support For Legalization Grows Among US College Students, Though No Real Evidence Is Cited)Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 13:36:57 EST Originator: drctalk@drcnet.org Sender: drctalk@drcnet.org From: Phillizy@aol.com To: Multiple recipients of listSubject: Students Say "Yes" To Pot Newshawk Report: Students say "yes" to pot Washington (AP) February 11, 1998 Much like their parents a generation ago, today's college students are just saying yes to marijuana and are increasingly supportive of its legalization. "It's out there, but it isn't a big deal. If you don't smoke, you just disregard it." said Amy Kim, a freshman at the University of Arizona. "I'm not surprised students think it should be legalized because it's the most accessible thing out there next to liquor." The student comments underscore a growing trend among American youth. Call it a shift from reefer madness to reefer gladness, as use of marijuana rises along with support for its legalization, according to recent surveys of student attitudes. The affinity for marijuana flies in the face of growing conservatism in other areas, according to surveys.
------------------------------------------------------------------- FDA Clears New Drug For Migraine (Although US Government Won't Allow Testing Of One Proven Remedy For Debilitating Headaches, 'Reuters' Says Pharmaceutical Giant Glaxo-Wellcome Obtained Marketing Clearance From FDA For Amerge - $1.1 Billion Global Migraine Market Includes More Than 26 Million People In US And 585 Million People Worldwide - One In 10) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 1998 13:09:02 -0800 To: mapnews@mapinc.org From: Olafur BrentmarSubject: MN: US: FDA Clears New Drug For Migraine Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Newshawk: Marcus-Mermelstein Family Source: Reuters Pubdate: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 FDA CLEARS NEW DRUG FOR MIGRAINE WASHINGTON - Pharmaceutical giant Glaxo-Wellcome said Wednesday it had won marketing clearance from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Amerge, a new, longer-acting migraine medicine. Amerge, known generically as naratriptan, is one of a newer class of migraine drugs called triptans that act on a brain chemical known as serotonin. Scientists are not sure just how they work, but they can reduce the pain of migraines and symptoms such as the auras that many sufferers see around objects. In clinical trials, between 60 and 66 percent of volunteers with moderate to severe headache said Amerge helped their pain within four hours, and the pain stayed away for a day in between 72 and 81 percent of the volunteers. More than 26 million people in the U.S. suffer from migraine. It affects 585 million people worldwide or one in 10 of the world's population. Besides causing severe headache, migraines can also cause nausea, vomiting, and sensitivity to light, sound and smell. Attacks can last from four to 72 hours. Amerge is meant to have longer-lasting effects than Imitrex (sumatriptan), Glaxo's other triptan. ``While Imitrex offers fast relief and efficacy, there are many migraine sufferers for whom the long duration of their headaches is of greatest concern,'' Dr Ninan Mathew of the Houston Headache Clinic in Texas, who helped in trials of the drug, said in a statement. ``The introduction of Amerge provides another option for these sufferers to be treated for this debilitating disease. This medication is effective, long-lasting and well-tolerated in most patients.'' People who have symptoms or signs of ischemic heart disease, including chest pain or heart attack, stroke, high blood pressure or other vascular problems, should not take Amerge or any other triptan because it can constrict the arteries leading from the heart. It also should not be taken with other migraine medications. Many companies are racing to get new migraine drugs onto the market. In December the FDA approved a new nose-spray formulation of Novartis Pharmaceuticals' Migranal, just after Glaxo won approval for a nose-spray formulation of Imitrex. There are also over-the-counter remedies. Last month the FDA said Bristol-Myers Squibb could package its Excedrin Extra Strength as a migraine medicine. Analysts have estimated that Imitrex, sold as Imigran in Europe, holds as much as 70 percent of the $1.1 billion global migraine market. Naratriptan is already sold as Naramig in Europe.
------------------------------------------------------------------- Canada To Appeal Stripping Of Snowboarder's Gold Over Drug ('Vancouver Sun' Says Canadian Olympic Officials Object To 3-2 Vote In Nagano, Japan, To Deprive Ross Rebagliati Of His Gold Medal Because He Tested Positive For Cannabis) From: creator@islandnet.com (Matt Elrod) To: mattalk@listserv.islandnet.com Subject: Canada to appeal stripping of snowboarder's gold over drug Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 08:35:05 -0800 Lines: 90 Newshawk: creator@mapinc.org Source: Vancouver Sun Contact: sunletters@pacpress.southam.ca Pubdate: Wed 11 Feb 1998 Section: A1 / Front Author: Justin Kingsley CANADA TO APPEAL STRIPPING OF SNOWBOARDER'S GOLD OVER DRUG The Olympic Committee splits its vote over positive tests for marijuana, that is not usually considered to enhance performance. NAGANO, Japan -- Canadian Olympic officials have appealed the decision to strip Canadian Ross Rebagliati of his gold medal after the Whistler snowboarder tested positive for marijuana. The International Olympic Committee said Tuesday night that Rebagliati, 26, had failed both parts of the drug tests medallists go through at the Olympic Games. The vote to disqualify Rebagliati and strip him of his medal was a 3-2 decision by the IOC executive board. There were two abstentions. But unlike Toronto sprinter Ben Johnson, stripped of his Olympic gold medal and world record in 1988 in Seoul for using the anabolic steroid stanozolol, Rebagliati's positive test did not involve what is generally considered a performance-enhancing substance. Asked if the IOC considered the Rebagliati case an equal crime to that of Johnson's, IOC director-general Francois Carrard replied with one word -- ``No.'' Carrard, who announced the IOC ruling, admitted opinions were ``quite split'' about whether to apply a sanction. ``There is quite a lot of discussion about marijuana,'' he said. ``In some situations it could have an enhancing effect. Opinions were quite split about whether it [the sanction] was appropriate or not.'' ``It was not as easy decision to take I can tell you very frankly,'' he added. Asked what his thoughts were about stripping an athlete of a gold medal for marijuana, Carrard said: ``I cannot express any personal opinion on this matter.'' The Canadian Olympic Association, which scheduled a news conference for midnight EST, says it plans to mount an appeal to an independent court of arbitration. That body would have to make a ruling within 24 hours of the appeal. The IOC medical code calls for a punishment ranging from a serious warning to a sanction, Carrard said. ``The decision was to apply sanction,'' he said. He said there was no evidence the marijuana use happened in Japan. Much of the news conference focused on why marijuana use could lead to such a serious penalty. ``Marijuana is a drug with certain restrictions,'' Carrard said. ``It's not proven it's a performance-enhancing drug. There's a debate with that drug. And this debate is reflected here.'' The IOC confirmation capped hours of rumours concerning a positive drug test and it comes just days after Canada celebrated Rebagliati's win in the giant slalom on Saturday night. It was the first ever snowboarding medal awarded at the Games and the sport -- famous for its unique style and zest -- seemed to be an instant Olympic hit. But on Tuesday night -- early Wednesday in Nagano, the rumor mill was running in high gear about a positive drug test. The Canadian Olympic Association scheduled a news conference and then cancelled. Attempts to reach officials on their cellular phones failed. The snowboarders were unreachable. ``All I've heard is like you is the rumours,'' said David Bedford, assistant press chief for the Canadian Olympic team, prior to the Pound confirmation. Rebagliati is a professional snowboarder who was received like a rock star when he received his gold medal. He dedicated his Olympic win to a friend who died in an avalanche The gold medal appeared to be Rebagliati's ticket to fame and fortune. *** Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 12:08:26 EST Originator: medmj@drcnet.org Sender: medmj@drcnet.org From: Lynn {Grr8ful}To: Multiple recipients of list Subject: Re: Snowboard Winner Stripped of Gold You can send him a card from http://salutations.sympatico.ca/OlympicSalutations/createCard.html?u=Ross Peacefully, Lynn
------------------------------------------------------------------- Golden Snowboarder Stripped Of His Medal ('Toronto Star' Version) From: creator@islandnet.com (Matt Elrod) To: mattalk@listserv.islandnet.com Subject: Golden snowboarder stripped of his medal Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 08:33:22 -0800 Lines: 187 Newshawk: creator@mapinc.org Source: Toronto Star Contact: LetterToEd@thestar.com Pubdate: February 11, 1998 Author: Doug Smith, Toronto Star Sports Reporter GOLDEN SNOWBOARDER STRIPPED OF HIS MEDAL Canadian hero Rebagliati tests positive for drugs; appeal launched NAGANO - Canada's golden snowboarder, Ross Rebagliati, has been stripped of his gold medal after failing a drug test. Rebagliati, a hero last weekend when he won the first gold medal in the sport's Olympic history, tested positive for marijuana, the International Olympic Committee said today. Canadian Olympic officials said they are appealing the decision. Rebagliati, 26, says he hasn't smoked marijuana since last April and claims that he tested positive because of exposure to second-hand smoke, according to Carol Ann Letheren, chief executive officer of the Canadian Olympic Association. ``He claims the small amount is due to the significant amount of time he spends in an environment with marijuana users,'' Letheren said today. The IOC's decision was announced by director-general Francois Carrard. ``The athlete is disqualified and excluded with immediate effect for the presence of marijuana metabolites,'' Carrard said. The Canadian Olympic Association ``is hereby requested to withdraw the medal awarded to Rebagliati,'' he added. ``The COA has declared its intention to appeal the decision to the Court of Arbitration of Sport. The decision of that appeal must be rendered within 24 hours.'' Both urine samples provided by Rebagliati tested positive for traces of marijuana. The IOC medical commission, by a 13-12 vote, determined the test was actually positive. The committee's executive board, by a 3-2 vote with two abstentions, then decided to strip Rebagliati of his medal. ``I know there was a very lengthy debate; they were fairly split on the issue,'' Carrard said. Italy's Thomas Prugger won the silver medal behind Rebagliati with Ueli Kestenholz of Switzerland taking bronze and Austrian Dieter Krassnig finishing fourth. They would move up if the ruling were upheld. The Rebagliati case recalls the controversy that erupted when sprinter Ben Johnson was stripped of his Olympic gold medal and world record in 1988 in Seoul for using the anabolic steroid stanozolol. There is a key difference this time: Rebagliati's positive test did not involve what is generally considered a performance-enhancing substance. Asked whether the IOC considered the Rebagliati case an equal crime to Johnson's, Carrard replied with one word - ``No.'' Japanese police said they would question Rebagliati about marijuana use following his disqualification from the Winter Olympics. ``We are going to question the athlete about marijuana because possession of the drug is illegal in Japan,'' said a Nagano police spokesperson. The COA agrees with the test findings but wants the punishment changed to a reprimand. Letheren told a news conference that while the COA does not condone the use of marijuana, it believes the drug does nothing to make a snowboarder better. ``There is no question the minute traces present would not have an effect on the outcome of the competition,'' she said. ``We clearly believe the appropriate penalty in this instance would be a severe reprimand.'' Rebagliati, a resident of Whistler, B.C., was not at the news conference. He issued a statement through snowboard team leader Michael Wood. ``I have been trying for 11 years to become the best snowboarder in the world,'' the statement said. ``I have worked too hard to let this slip through my fingers.'' *** The arbitration board that will hear the appeal is independent of the IOC *** Dick Pound, an IOC vice-president from Montreal, said the COA would appeal the results to the Independent Court of Arbitration. He did not say on what grounds the appeal will be lodged. Other COA officials were not immediately available for comment. The arbitration board that will hear the appeal is independent of the IOC. ``They have very ample powers to review this decision,'' Carrard said. Rebagliati was the toast of the Canadian team last weekend after winning the first Olympic snowboarding gold medal in history. He was expected to garner untold riches from his victory and, ironically, said dope testing made him realize just how big his sport had grown. ``It was drug testing that really drove home to me the importance of the Olympics,'' he said. ``I've never been exposed to that kind of thing before.'' But he sounded nonplussed when asked whether he was worried about providing urine samples. ``No, no,'' he said. ``Those tests were for steriods and I've never gone near them.'' Rebagliati has been a member of the national team since 1996 and lists his occupation as pro snowboarder in the Olympic team guide. His hobbies: surfing, golfing and mountain biking among others. ``I'm still going to be the same person, maybe I won't have to worry about getting all the movie channels on my TV now, things like that,'' the 5-foot-10, 180-pounder said. ``But I'm not going to change. ``I'm still the same guy.'' Snowboarding made its Olympic debut at these Games. One of the fastest-growing winter sports in the world, it enjoys immense popularity among young adults. Seen as the renegades of the Olympic movement, the competitors did not fit the mainstream Olympic profile. ``Kids will start growing up with Olympic dreams now,'' Rebagliati said after his win. Sylvia Rebagliati, Ross' grandmother, dismissed the controversy. *** `He's gone from the height of ecstacy to the depths of turmoil' *** ``Ridiculous,'' she said from Vancouver. ``I have every confidence in Ross and nothing will deter me from defending him. ``I don't think he's guilty, but it sounds like they're going to put that trip on him. I know him too well. He's not the party type. He doesn't even drink alcohol - except, I guess, for the champagne when he won.'' Rebagliati had finished eighth in the first of two timed runs down the 40-gate, 936-metre snowboard course, including a 290-metre vertical drop, that arrows down Mount Yakebitai northeast of Nagano. But he is known for his strong, let-it-all-out second runs, and he came through again this time to win gold for Canada. Peter Judge, coach of the Canadian freestyle ski team, said he felt bad about the turn of events. ``It's got to be really rough for him,'' Judge said. ``He's gone from the height of ecstasy to the depths of turmoil and despair. I have to say I'm very impressed with how well he spoke and handled himself after he won. ``It's a tough thing to see that young man now put on the stretch rack like that and hung out to dry.'' Bob Clarke, general manager of the Canadian Olympic hockey team, said the news is disappointing. With files from Randy Starkman, Alan Adams, Allan Ryan, Norman Da Costa, Canadian Press and Reuters news agency.
------------------------------------------------------------------- Up In Smoke - Canadian Snowboarder Loses Gold Medal After Positive Marijuana Test (Updated Version Of Yesterday's 'Associated Press' Account) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 05:14:26 -0700 To: maptalk@mapinc.org From: Steve KubbySubject: CNN: Canadian loses gold medal for marijuana test Up in smoke Canadian snowboarder loses gold medal after positive marijuana test CNN Posted: Wed February 11, 1998 at 5:18 AM ET NAGANO, Japan (AP) -- The first Olympic gold medal in the youngest, hippest, most rebellious sport in the games -- snowboarding -- was stripped because of marijuana use. Ross Rebagliati, 26, of Canada tested positive for the drug after his winning run in the men's giant slalom Monday, the International Olympic Committee said. It was the first positive drug test reported at the Nagano Games, and officials said they could not recall another Olympic case involving marijuana. It also was the first time a gold medalist had been stripped since another Canadian, Ben Johnson, was disqualified in 1988 as 100-meter champion for using steroids, IOC officials said. IOC director general Francois Carrard said Wednesday (Tuesday night ET) that Rebagliati had been asked to return his gold medal. The Canadian Olympic Association said it would appeal the case. The Canadian association's chief, Carol Anne Letheren, said Rebagliati told officials he had not used marijuana since April 1997, and that the positive test was due to "the significant amount of time that Ross spends in an environment where he is exposed to marijuana." She called for a severe reprimand rather than suspension. "There's always great sadness and great embarrassment," Letheren said. "This will undoubtedly be tough for the sport." Rebagliati, in a statement read at a news conference, said he had worked "for 11 years to be the best snowboarder in the world. ... I've worked too hard to let this slip through my fingers." Carrard said the first part of the two-part drug test found traces of metabolized marijuana in Rebagliati's urine. The second part of the test turned up more signs of marijuana use, 17.8 nanograms per milliliter, Carrard said. That meant Rebagliati, a British Columbian whose triumph was celebrated throughout Canada, was out in the narrowest of votes. "It is always sad to be facing such a situation," Carrard said. "It was not an easy decision to take." He refused to go into detail about the decision-making process, citing Canada's appeal. But he did say the IOC board vote was 3-2, with two members abstaining. The medical commission vote was 13-12 in favor of recommending action to the IOC governing body. The IOC also could have reprimanded Rebagliati but allowed him to keep his medal. "Opinions were quite split," Carrard said. "It was an unusually close decision." International ski federation rules allow 15 nanograms per milliliter; the IOC allows none. The fact that Rebagliati's levels tested above 15 "did have a certain influence on the debate," Carrard said. The Committee for the Arbitration of Sport will now review the case and must rule within 24 hours. It has overturned drug cases before. Carrard said he had no indication that Rebagliati used the drug in Japan. "There is no evidence at all that marijuana was consumed here," he said. But Kyodo News reported that police from Nagano prefecture, or province, will ask the IOC to submit results of Rebagliati's test on suspicion he violated Japan's drug laws. Under the law, a marijuana possession conviction carries up to 7 years in prison. Marijuana long has been on the IOC list of banned drugs, but Carrard said he had no memory of the drug ever appearing before at the Olympics. "There are no cases which are similar," Carrard said. Carrard said emphatically that the Johnson and Rebagliati cases were not similar. "Canada can say that there goes a gold medal, but you can't compare the two cases," Carrard said. Rebagliati, who dedicated his Olympic win to a friend who died in an avalanche, said at his post-victory news conference that he first realized his Generation-X sport had reached Olympic status when drug testers started to appear at meets. But though snowboarders acknowledge their sport's freewheeling reputation, they say illegal drug use is hardly the rule. "I wouldn't say that every other snowboarder is out there puffing a joint," said Michael Wood, the Canadian snowboarding team's leader. "I don't think it's more prevalent in snowboarding than it is in any other sport." Other substances banned by the IOC include alcohol, caffeine, local anesthetics and performance-enhancing steroids. Though marijuana is not traditionally considered performance-enhancing, Carrard said he had been "told that in some situations, it could be." In another drug case, U.S. bobsledder Michael Dionne was removed from the Olympic team after his drug suspension was upheld, but he was urged to stay in Nagano because he was guilty only of "carelessness." Dionne said he took the banned stimulant ephedrine accidentally in cold medicine.
------------------------------------------------------------------- Snowboard Winner Stripped Of Gold (New 'Associated Press' Article In 'Los Angeles Times' Is Of The Opinion That The 'Rebagliati Revelation Threatens To Undermine Snowboarding') Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 13:14:39 -0800 To: mapnews@mapinc.org From: jwjohnson@netmagic.net (Joel W. Johnson) Subject: MN: LATimes: Snowboard Winner Stripped of Gold Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Newshawk: Jim Rosenfield Source: Los Angeles Times Contact: letters@latimes.com Pubdate: February 11, 1998 Author: Ted Anthony, Associated Press Writer SNOWBOARDER WINNER STRIPPED OF GOLD NAGANO, Japan--Dealing a body blow to the Olympics' newest and most rebellious sport, the governing board of the Winter Games stripped a Canadian snowboarding champion of his 3-day-old gold medal today after drug tests turned up trace amounts of marijuana in his system. Canada's Olympic association immediately appealed the International Olympic Committee's decision, blaming secondhand smoke and saying snowboarder Ross Rebagliati pledged he hadn't used marijuana since April 1997. Rebagliati, 26, who won the first-ever Olympic gold medal for snowboarding in the men's giant slalom Sunday, became the first athlete to test positive for drugs at the Nagano Games. Officials said they could not recall another Olympic case involving marijuana. In a statement read by a teammate at a news conference this afternoon, he maintained his innocence. "I've been training for 11 years to be the best snowboarder in the world," he said. "I've worked too hard to let this slip through my fingers." The Rebagliati revelation threatens to undermine snowboarding just as its Olympic medal debut and Visa's recent sponsorship lend the Gen-X sport legitimacy beyond the world of Mountain Dew commercials, ESPN/2 features and "dude"-laden speech, where it has existed for the past decade. "This will undoubtedly be tough for the sport," said Carol Anne Letheren, the Canadian association's chief. "There's always great sadness and embarrassment." Only four positive drug tests have ever been recorded at the Winter Olympics -two at Innsbruck in 1976, one in Sarajevo in 1984 and one in Calgary in 1988. For Canada, this is also sadly reminiscent of Seoul in Summer 1988, when Toronto sprinter Ben Johnson lost his gold medal and world record for using the anabolic steroid stanozolol. IOC officials said no gold medalist since Johnson has been disqualified for drug use. And no gold medalist was ever disqualified for drugs before 1988, when several weightlifting champions were banned for steroid use just days before Johnson's disqualification. Letheren said Rebagliati told officials the positive test was due to "the significant amount of time that Ross spends in an environment where he is exposed to marijuana." She said a severe reprimand would have been more appropriate than taking back his medal. IOC Director General Francois Carrard said the first part of the two-part drug test found traces of metabolized marijuana in Rebagliati's urine. The second part turned up more signs of marijuana use -17.8 nanograms per milliliter, Carrard said. That meant Rebagliati, a British Columbian whose triumph was celebrated throughout Canada, was out in the narrowest of votes. "It is always sad to be facing such a situation," Carrard said. "It was not an easy decision to take." He refused to go into detail about the decision-making process, citing Canada's appeal. But he did say the IOC board vote was 3/2, with two members abstaining. The medical commission vote was 13 -12 in favor of recommending action to the IOC governing body. The IOC also could have reprimanded Rebagliati but allowed him to keep his medal. "It was an unusually close decision," Carrard said. International ski federation rules allow 15 nanograms per milliliter; the IOC allows none. The fact that Rebagliati's levels tested above 15 "did have a certain influence on the debate," Carrard said. The Committee for the Arbitration of Sport, which must rule within 24 hours, has overturned drug cases before. Rebagliati declined comment tonight as he arrived at the Nagano hotel where the committee was meeting. Carrard said he had no indication Rebagliati used the drug in Japan. But Kyodo News reported that police from Nagano prefecture, or province, will ask the IOC for Rebagliati's test results. A marijuana possession conviction in Japan carries up to seven years in prison. Rebagliati, who dedicated his Olympic medal to a friend killed in an avalanche, said after winning the gold that he realized his sport had reached Olympic status when drug testers began appearing at meets. He said performance-enhancing drugs "were not part of our sport." But though snowboarders acknowledge their sport's freewheeling reputation, they say illegal drug use is hardly the rule. "I wouldn't say that every other snowboarder is out there puffing a joint," said Michael Wood, the Canadian snowboarding team's leader. "I don't think it's more prevalent in snowboarding than it is in any other sport." And Rob Roy, a coach for the U.S. snowboarding team, said the sport was "striving for legitimacy" and could be hurt by what happened today. "I think the public sort of looks at this and thinks, `Ah -snowboarders are all wild and crazy," he said. "That's not good." Marijuana has long been on the IOC list of banned drugs, but Carrard said he had no memory of the drug ever appearing before at the Olympics. "There are no cases which are similar," Carrard said. Other substances banned by the IOC include alcohol, caffeine, local anesthetics and performance-enhancing steroids. Though marijuana is not traditionally considered performance-enhancing, Carrard said he had been "told that in some situations, it could be." In another drug case, U.S. bobsledder Michael Dionne was pulled from the Olympic team after his drug suspension was upheld but was urged to stay in Nagano because he was guilty only of "carelessness." Dionne said he took the banned stimulant ephedrine accidentally in cold medicine.
------------------------------------------------------------------- Snowboarder Loses Medal After Drug Test ('USA Today' Version - Plus URLs For Online Public Opinion Polls) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 22:19:55 -0500 To: DrugSense News ServiceFrom: Richard Lake Subject: MN: USA TODAY: Snowboarder Loses Medal After Drug Test Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Newshawk: rlake@mapinc.org Source: USA TODAY Pubdate: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 Author: Tom Weir, USA TODAY Contact: editor@usatoday.com *** Editor's note: We have already posted versions of this story from other newspapers, and here is the same story as published by the largest circulation newspaper in the United States. Is there a daily newspaper out there that has not covered this story? Thank you to the newshawks that posted wire service versions, but we are going to skip them this time. Already there is an indication that folks are responding with letters to the editor as indicated on our MAPTALK discussion list. For a couple more versions of the story check out the following sites which are also asking folks to vote on what should be done. Thanks to Chris Clay for these URLs: http://www.canoe.ca/ http://www.thestar.com/editorial/news/980211NEW01a_12206.html *** SNOWBOARDER LOSES MEDAL AFTER DRUG TEST NAGANO - Snowboarding was supposed to bring Generation X into the Winter Olympics, but instead it quickly has joined the long list of sports with drug violations. After testing positive for marijuana, Canada's Ross Rebagliati apparently will have to give back the first gold medal awarded in snowboarding. He won the giant slalom Sunday on the Mount Yakebital course. IOC Director General Francois Carrad announced the failed test Wednesday (Tuesday night ET) and also that the Canadian delegation had filed an immediate appeal. The appeal will be ruled on within 24 hours, Carrard said. "It is always sad to be facing such a situation," Carrard said. "It was not an easy decision to take." Carrard said a second urine test taken from Rebagliati showed more signs of marijuana use, 17.8 nanograms per milliliter. Carrard wouldn't reveal details of the decision to disqualify Rebagliati, but he did say the IOC board vote was 3-2, with two members abstaining. The failed test adds a chapter to Canada's history of drug-related embarrassment at the Games. Probably the most infamous drug violation involved a Canadian, when sprinter Ben Johnson lost the 100-meter gold he won in track in world-record time at the 1988 Seoul Summer Olympics. Unlike anabolic steroids and most other substances on the International Olympic Committee's banned list, marijuana is not a performance-enhancing drug. The test for marijuana is considered relatively simple. Unlike some other drugs, evidence of marijuana use stays in the system for weeks or even months. All medalists are tested immediately after competition. A first urine sample is tested, and if there is a positive result a second sample that was sealed at the same time as the first is opened and tested. Snowboarding had received an immediate and enthusiastic reception in Nagano. A crowd estimated at 10,000 had stood three-deep along both sides of the lower portion of the giant slalom course. After his gold-medal performance, the 26-year-old Rebagliati of Vancouver naturally was ecstatic. "It was electric," Rebagliati said after has victory. "The vibes going through all the people were pretty wild. The amount of support was overwhelming. The amount of media attention was unbelievable. The spirit of the Olympics certainly shined here today."
------------------------------------------------------------------- Snowboarder Loses His Gold To Pot ('San Francisco Chronicle' Version) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 20:49:46 -0800 To: mapnews@mapinc.org From: jwjohnson@netmagic.net (Joel W. Johnson) Subject: MN: SFChron: Snowboarder Loses His Gold To Pot Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Newshawk: "Tom O'Connell"Source: San Francisco Chronicle Contact: chronletters@sfgate.com Pubdate: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 SNOWBOARDER LOSES HIS GOLD TO POT Nagano The first Olympic gold medal winner in the youngest, hippest sport in the games -- snowboarding -- was stripped of his prize today because of marijuana use. Ross Rebagliati of Canada tested positive for the drug after his winning run in the men's giant slalom Monday, the International Olympic Committee said. It was the first positive drug test rported at the Nagano Games, and officials said they could not recall another Olympic case involving marijuana. IOC Director General Francois Carrard said today that Rebagliati had been asked to return his gold medal. The Canadian Olympic Association said it would appeal the case. Carrard said the IOC has not yet decided how to reallocate the snowboarding medals if the takeback holds up through appeal. At the competition Sunday, Italy's Thomas Prugger placed second, Ueli Kestenholz of Switzerland was third and Diter Krassnig of Austria fourth. Carrard said the first part of the two-part drug test found traces of metabolized marijuana in Rebagliati's urine. The second part of the test turned up more signs of marijuana use, 17.8 nanograms per milliliter, Carrard said. The IOC has no specific threshold for marijuana use, although it is a banned substance. It is not listed as a performance-enhancing substance, however. International federation rules allow 15 nanograms per milliliter, the IOC allows none. The fact that Rebagliati's levels tested above 15 "did have a certain influence on the debate," Carrard said. "It is always sad to be facing such a situation," Carrard said. "It was not an easy decision to take." He refused to go into detail about the decision-making process because of Canada's appeal. But he did say the IOC board vote was 3 to 2, with two members abstaining. The medical commission vote was 13 to 12 in favor of recommending action to the IOC governing body. The IOC also could have reprimanded Rebagliati but allowed him to keep his medal. Carrard said he had no indication either that Rebagliati used the drug in Japan or that Japanese authorities were investigating. The Committee for the Arbitration of Sport will now review the case and must rule within 24 hours. It has overturned drug cases before. Rebagliati said at his post-victory news conference that he first realized his sport had reached Olympic status when drug testers started to appear at meets.
------------------------------------------------------------------- Olympics (Commentary From List Subscribers On New Prohibition Against Pot Smokers Winning Olympic Gold Medals) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 22:59:36 EST Reply-To: adamsr@dmci.net Originator: drctalk@drcnet.org Sender: drctalk@drcnet.org From: Rick AdamsTo: Multiple recipients of list Subject: Olympics According to the news, the Canadian who took the Gold Medal for snow boarding just tested positive for marijuana and may lose his medal. An immediate response to the letters column pointing out that at least SOME of the athletes come from nations where private consumption of marijuana is NOT illegal, and thus have the same right to use the substance that the other athletes have to drink alcohol (which is NOT tested for) might be a positive step for us. Between the concept of basketball players who smoke pot and now an olympic athlete who does so--and was still able to win an olympic gold--can't help but to help us dispell the false image pot has in our society, but we need to get to the letters columns BEFORE the drug warriors begin posting their "keep the druggies out of competition with decent people" rhetoric. It's too bad it wasn't a Netherlands citizen--I would LOVE to see the result of those hearings--given that personal possession is legal in Holland, a very good case could be made that if pot is banned for olympic athletes, alcohol and nicotine should be as well. Rick *** Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 06:28:05 -0700 From: Steve Kubby (kubby@alpworld.com) Subject: Alpine World Refused to Cover Olympics Wed. Feb 11, 1998 Editorial: Olympic Disgrace! Alpine World Refused to Cover Olympics Until Rebagliati is awarded Gold Medal Suppose the Olympics were held in Nazi Germany and much to the horror of the Nazi Officials, they discovered their national winner of a gold medal was secretly a Jew. Suppose the Nazi government deprived the winner of his medal because of his chosen religion. Suppose the persecution was against a Jew!! How would the world react? Well, it has happened. A charming Canadian by the name of Ross Rebagliati won the first Olympic Gold for snowboarding. Now Olympic officials have taken his well-earned gold medal because Ross tested positive for pot. Is there any claim that using marijuana constitutes cheating? Has anyone said marijuana makes a snowboarder better and gives him an unfair advantage? Or, is it just religious persecution because he prefers to enjoy hemp, rather than caffeine, alcohol, tobacco, or some other "moral" drug when he wants to relax? The Olympics is about sports, not persecution. Until Ross Rebagliati is given back his gold medal, Alpine World will refuse to cover any Olympic events *** A l p i n e W o r l d O n l i n e Highly Rated by NEWSWEEK and WEBSIGHT magazines. Awarded TOP 5% by Point and WebScout Way-cool site ALPINE WORLD PUBLISHING, INC. P.O. Box 2025, Olympic Valley, CA 96146 E-mail: kubby@alpworld.com URL: http://www.alpworld.com
------------------------------------------------------------------- Waiting For A Decision - CBC - The National Transcripts On Ross Rebagliati (Canadian Broadcasting Corporation Television Newscast From Winter Olympics In Nagano, Japan, Notes Snowboarder's Gold Medal Has Been Lost Due To Positive Urine Test For Marijuana) Date: Sat, 21 Feb 1998 14:34:23 -0500 To: DrugSense News ServiceFrom: Richard Lake Subject: MN: Canada: CBC The National transcripts on Ross Rebagliati Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Newshawk: Richard Lake Source: CBC-TV, The National Website: Note: Transcripts from the 11th, 12th and 17th of February are below. Title: Headlines. Host: PETER MANSBRIDGE Date: 980211 ANNOUNCER: From CBC News... PETER MANSBRIDGE: Tonight: waiting for a decision. UNIDENTIFIED: How are you doing Ross? MANSBRIDGE: Ross Rebagliati fights to keep Olympic gold. The frustration at home... UNIDENTIFIED: Canada loses its medal. This puts a dark light on snowboarding. MANSBRIDGE: How Whistler BC is reacting. The inside dope. UNIDENTIFIED: If you weren't warned about this and you go to a party and somebody's smoking, you could test positive. MANSBRIDGE: The straight facts about marijuana. HANA GARTNER: And on the Magazine: Board Games; it's the wild child of skiing. UNIDENTIFIED: Just going to cut down through these trees here. Try and keep up your speed. GARTNER: Thrills, chills and plenty of skills. And now, an Olympic scandal. ANNOUNCER: The National, with Hana Gartner and Peter Mansbridge.
------------------------------------------------------------------- Marijuana Legalization Bill Dies In Legislature - Lack Of Support - Senate Bill 6271 Is Allowed To Expire In Committee - Plus Sidebar - Medical Pot Backers Wrangle Over New Plans ('The Olympian' Gives An Update On Developments In Washington State) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 15:33:30 EST Originator: drctalk@drcnet.org Sender: drctalk@drcnet.org From: Randy ChaseTo: Multiple recipients of list Subject: mmj, now!:Washington State News The Olympian February 11, 1998 page A10 Note: The Olympian is the daily newspaper in the capital of Washington state 'Marijuana legalization bill dies in Legislature' *Lack of support: Senate Bill 6271 is allowed to expire in committee By D. Eric Jones The Olympian A push to legalize marijuana for limited use has died in the Legislature, and a leading proponent is unsure when of if she'll pick up the fight again. Advocates of medical use of marijuana are working on two possible initiatives that could go before voters in the fall. But sounding weary Tuesday, Sen Jeanne Kohl, D-Seattle. said she won't decide whether to support those efforts until after the session, expected to end March 12. Kohl's proposal, Senate Bill 6271, was harshly criticized by everyone from the Lt. Gov. to law enforcement. Adding to the strain, a close friend of Kohl's diagnosed with uterine cancer in 1995 died in Bainbridge Island last week. "She died essentially a criminal, Sen Kohl said. That's because her friend occasionally smoked marijuana to offset the effects of her chemotherapy and radiation treatments, Kohl said. But Kohl's cause went nowhere with other lawmakers. Sen Alex Deccio, R-Yakima, himself a champion of reformed marijuana laws, let the bill expire Friday in a Senate committee, saying it lacked legislative support. However, Rob Killian, a Tacoma physician who headed last year's failed Initiative 685 campaign, said he will file an initiative next week that could provide marijuana to patients in extreme circumstances, but would address many of the concerns of I-685's opponents. "It will narrowly define who is eligible for the treatmentS based on what is scientifically proven, Killian said. It would also mandate government supervision and regulation of marijuana distribution, he said. One other initiative is being drafted. Yelm Police Chief Glenn Dunnam, who testified against Kohl's bill, said he is pleased with Killian's willingness to address law enforcement concerns. However, because marijuana is federally classified as a Schedule 1 controlled substance, Dunnam said, police and prosecutors might still not endorse Killian's proposal for fear of being caught in legal limbo, fearing conflict with federal law enforcement agencies. Side-bar story same page: Medical pot backers wrangle over new plans by D. Eric Jones With a proposal to allow the medical use of marijuana stalled in the state Legislature, proponents are shifting their attack to a public campaign and the November ballot. However, even some supporters don't see eye to eye. Joanna McKee, director of the Seattle-based Green Cross marijuana distribution network, filed a one-page initiative proposal with the Secretary of State's Office last week, which she called a "work in progress" McKee's proposal would give legal immunity for patients using marijuana for cronic pain or terminal ailments as well as doctors who advise its use. However, McKee's proposal has drawn criticism from even medical marijuana supporters. Tacoma physician Rob Killian said McKee's draft initiative language is too broad and won't pass in November. "It opens it up for everyone to grow and sell and distribute marijuana," said Killian, who is planning his own initiative. Yelm Police Chief Glenn Dunnam was more critical, calling it "about as radical as you can get." McKee, however, said she wasn't giving up on her proposal. She simply hoped to the (sic) get revisions back from the Secretary of State's Office. Proponents of either measure would need 179,248 valid voter signatures by July 2 to qualify for the November 3 ballot.
------------------------------------------------------------------- Alerts - Growing Industrial Hemp ('San Francisco Bay Guardian' Publicizes California Industrial Hemp Act Of 1998 Ballot Initiative Sponsored By Californians For Industrial Renewal, CAIR) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 20:14:19 -0800 To: mapnews@mapinc.org From: Olafur BrentmarSubject: MN: US CA: Alerts: Growing Industrial Hemp Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Newshawk: "Frank S. World" Pubdate: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 Source: San Francisco Bay Guardian Author: Mandy Weltman Website: http://www.sfbg.com Contact: letters@sfbg.com. ALERTS: GROWING INDUSTRIAL HEMP Californians for Industrial Renewal (CAIR) is now circulating petitions to get the Industrial Hemp Act of 1998 on the November ballot. The act would allow the state's farmers to grow industrial-grade hemp with a THC content of less than one percent. If you are interested in circulating petitions, pick them up at Frankel Bros. Hemp Outfitters, 3817 24th St., S.F. (415) 826-HEMP. Mail Alerts to the Bay Guardian, 520 Hampshire, S.F., CA 94110; fax to (415) 255-8762; or E-mail mandy@sfbg.com. Please include a contact telephone number. Items must be received at least one week prior to publication date. Call (415) 255-3100, ext. 552, for more information.
------------------------------------------------------------------- Overdose Victim - Shared Responsibility In Latest Tragedy ('Dallas Morning News' Staff Editorial Endorses Prosecution Of Those With 17-Year-Old In Plano, Texas, On Evening Of Heroin-Related Death) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 09:09:29 EST Originator: drctalk@drcnet.org Sender: drctalk@drcnet.org From: adbryan@onramp.net To: Multiple recipients of listSubject: EDITORIAL: Overdose Victim *** [adbryan@onramp.net:] I'm having a real difficult time believing that the editorial staff of the Dallas Morning News used the following line: "Pursuit of those who were with Natacha when she took a fatal dose might provide the warning that ultimately will save lives." What a bunch of crap. This type of pursuit will ensure that more dead overdose victims will be found dumped in church parking lots (that is where one of the early Plano OD victims was found). Natacha's parents also feel this way and want police to file charges on anyone who was with Natacha that fatal night. Also, heroin did not vanish during the 70's. It was readily available. *** Dallas Morning News February 11, 1998 http://www.dallasnews.com letterstoeditor@dallasnews.com discussion forum: http://forums.dallasnews.com/dallas Overdose Victim - Shared responsibility in latest tragedy Life quietly came to an end Monday for 17-year-old Natacha Marie Campbell. After waiting two days to see some ray of hope that the Plano teenager might survive an overdose of cocaine and heroin, family members agreed to take her off life support. At least a dozen young people from the Plano area have died from heroin-related overdoses since 1996. Natacha even attended the funerals of two of the victims, a family spokeswoman said. The mounting number of youthful drug overdoses has sent residents in search of answers. A crackdown on drug dealers and an increase in awareness programs have been the most immediate responses. But relatives of Natacha Campbell also want Richardson police to press charges against those who were with Natacha when she overdosed. The request may be an emotional one, based on the failure of the people to call help in time to save the teenager. Yet there are shared responsibilities in tragedies such as this that should not be ignored. Texas has a wide variety of laws, ranging from negligent homicide to reckless endangerment, that address the criminal issue of death caused by irresponsible actions. By now, the risk of taking heroin should be apparent to young people. If teenagers are going to share drugs, they should be prepared to face the shared responsibility if death or permanent damage follows. That may appear harsh. But society is in a war. This isn't a rebellious phase of life that will fade with time. Texas teens are becoming hooked on a drug that almost vanished in the 1970s because of its devastating effects. Along with tough prosecution of dealers and better education of students, there should be a strong warning message about the consequences for those who participate. Pursuit of those who were with Natacha when she took a fatal dose might provide the warning that ultimately will save lives.
------------------------------------------------------------------- Sacred Herb's Business Licence Threatened (Police In Victoria, British Columbia, Direct City To Hold Business Licence Of Hemp Shop After Proprietor Ian Hunter Becomes First Person In Canada Convicted Of Marijuana Seed Trafficking) Subject: Sacred Herb's business licence threatened To: mattalk@listserv.islandnet.com Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 23:43:11 -0800 (PST) From: "Ian Hunter" (ifhunter@islandnet.com) Victoria B.C. Canada: The Victoria City Police, most likely under pressure from American drug enforcement officials, have directed the city to hold Sacred Herb-The Hemp Shop's business licence because Ian Hunter, the Proprietor of the Sacred Herb, was found guilty of "marijuana seed trafficking". Hunter is the first person in Canada ever convicted of that "crime" (it is under appeal). The Sacred Herb hasn't been denied its business licence yet as the recommendation has to go to the Mayor and Council sitting as Committee as a Whole for a hearing. This week's meeting was to have the licence pulling on the agenda (without Hunter knowing a bout it), but the item was pulled at some point after Hunter found out Tuesday. "The Sacred Herb is the bench mark for freedom and liberty in Victoria," says Proprietor Ian Hunter. "We have worked hard at decriminalising Victoria and, now that we are close, U.S. based prohibition industry forces are trying to shut us down." The police action follows closely after Hemp B.C. Proprietor Marc Emery was denied a business licence, forcing him to sell his store and cafe on February 9 as well as lay off up to 30 employees. Parallel to that, the pulling of the Olympic Gold Medal from Ross Regagliati, has a lot of people talking about this issue. Next week Hunter will be presenting a proposed Provincial Industrial Hemp Strategy at the 2nd Annual Hemp Symposium (held in Vancouver February 18 and 19) on behalf of the B.C. Hemp Council, of which he is head. "I don't think this controversy over my licence could come at a better time to raise the debate over a Made-In-Victoria approach to the hemp, drug and harm reduction issue" he says. Hunter's Green Zone plan for such an ecological decriminalisation for downtown Victoria has been backed by the Victoria Downtown Nieghborhood Association, which Ian Hunter is on the board of. Hunter is also on the board of the Victoria Arts Council and the City's Crunch Committee working at implementing harm reduction in the region. In response to this challenge Hunter is starting a petition and letter writing campaign to save the Sacred Herb and further Victoria towards an end to prohibition. "I think it's hard to have a revolution without oppression," says Hunter. "Victoria is a very free and tolerant city so it is hard to feel oppressed. But this trend towards yanking business licences looks like another wave of American drug war oppression is going to hit, and if we don't save the Sacred Herb, we can expect to see a lot more uniformed home invasions and black helicopters. If we do get the city counsellors to come on the side of the citizens then we can be proud of a tolerant city and expect more freedom, more tourists and more jobs," says Hunter. -30-
------------------------------------------------------------------- Lords Cannabis Inquiry (Britain's 'Independent' Says House Of Lords Will Launch Major Investigation Into Medical, Recreational Use Of Cannabis, With Report Expected By End Of Year - Newspaper Calls It 'Biggest Step Yet In The Drive To Relax The Laws On The Drug's Use') Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 21:59:21 -0800 To: mapnews@mapinc.org From: Olafur BrentmarSubject: MN: UK: Lords cannabis inquiry Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Newshawk: Zosimos Pubdate: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 Source: The Independent (UK) Author: Anthony Bevins Contact: letters@independent.co.uk LORDS CANNABIS INQUIRY A high-powered investigation into the medical and recreational use of cannabis is to be launched by the House of Lords, with a report expected by the end of the year. The breakthrough Westminster inquiry comes five months after the Independent on Sunday launched its decriminalise cannabis campaign. It marks the biggest step yet in the drive to relax the laws on the drug's use. To date, the Government has refused to allow a debate on the matter in the Commons, despite calls from backbench Labour MPs. One factor in the Lords' decision was a report in November from the British Medical Association, urging Ministers to consider "changing the Misuse of Drugs Act to allow the prescription of cannabinoids [active chemical compounds in cannabis]to patients with certain conditions causing distress that are not adequately controlled by existing treatments." The BMA plea came after the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Bingham, called for a debate on the issue, saying: "It is a subject that deserves, in my judgement, detached, objective, independent consideration." Lord Bingham's urging will be met by the Lords Select Committee investigation, to be chaired by Liberal Democrat peer Lord Perry of Walton, a former Professor of Pharmacology. The all-party investigation's terms of reference are thought to cover "the scientific case for and against relaxing the prohibition on the medical and recreational use of cannabis". The inquiry is expected to start holding public hearings, with evidence from expert witnesses, after Easter, with a report that could be delivered in the Autumn.
------------------------------------------------------------------- Lords Defy Straw Over Cannabis (Britain's 'Guardian' Says Inquiry On Cannabis By House Of Lords Will Accept Evidence From March Until July And Publish Report In October - Home Secretary Jack Straw's Opposition To Inquiry Shows Willingness Of Lords To Examine Issues Considered Too Politically Sensitive By Commons) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 14:11:57 -0800 To: mapnews@mapinc.org From: Olafur BrentmarSubject: MN: UK: Lords Defy Straw Over Cannabis Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Reply-To: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Newshawk: Zosimos Pubdate: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 Source: Guardian (UK) Author: Lucy Ward, Political Correspondent Pubdate: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 Contact: letters@guardian.co.uk LORDS DEFY STRAW OVER CANNABIS The House of Lords is to launch an inquiry into the case for decriminalising cannabis, reigniting debate on the issue in the face of pledges by the Home Secretary, Jack Straw, to retain the ban. In a move underlining the continuing capacity of peers to embarrass the Government, the respected Lords science and technology select committee unveiled plans to examine the case for continuing to outlaw cannabis for medical and recreational use. Peers will take evidence from March until July and publish a report on their findings in October. Lord Perry of Walton, chairman of the sub-committee holding the inquiry, last night said he and fellow members had an open mind on the issue. The committee would call for factual scientific evidence and reject 'sociological prejudice'. The decision to hold the inquiry, emerging the day after peers inflicted a defeat on the Government over newspaper price wars, underlines the willingness of the Lords to examine issues considered too politically sensitive to be handled in the Commons. Committees of peers are seen to have greater freedom to confront controversial topics with less pressure to avoid embarrassing the Government than their colleagues in the Commons. Peers were influenced by a combination of increasing public debate on the matter and by the findings of a report by the British Medical Association which last autumn recommended the legalisation of cannabis-based drugs for medicinal use. The timing of the inquiry is particularly awkward for the Government as it comes less than two months after Mr Straw's son William was accused in a tabloid newspaper of selling cannabis to two undercover reporters. Mr Straw stood by his son over the claims, but reiterated his firm belief that the drug should remain illegal. Pressure for a liberalisation of the law has been gathering momentum. Labour campaigners led by the MP for Newport West, Paul Flynn, have called for the setting up of a royal commission to look into the question. Last week, national figures published by the Home Office suggested police in England and Wales are increasingly cautioning rather than prosecuting those arrested for possessing cannabis. Mr Flynn last night claimed the Lords inquiry reflected a shift in public opinion in favour of decriminalisation. He said: "The Lords will examine this issue objectively and with scientific expertise. They will hear evidence sensibly, free from the prejudice and ignorance that informs the national debate." The decision to examine the case for decriminalising cannabis was taken by the full science and technology select committee, which has the power to decide its own areas of inquiry. Lord Perry, a former professor of pharmacology and a fellow of the Open University, last night said the committee would seek to examine only the scientific arguments. "Of course it is going to be tricky, but when you are talking about scientific evidence you are talking about real evidence, not sociological prejudice. "I don't think there is any preconceived notion that we will come out one way or the other. This was simply a thing that was thought to be worthy of scientific study." The Government has no obligation to take note of reports published by House of Lords select committees, but in practice it will have to acknowledge the findings of an independent and respected group of peers. A Home Office spokesman last night reinforced Mr Straw's tough line. "It has been the Government's repeated stance that they have no intention of changing the law on cannabis, which is in line with the United Nations convention on drug control. While the Government is always interested in informal debate on these sort of subjects, it has made clear its position."
------------------------------------------------------------------- Crackdown Fails To Curb Morocco's Drugs Trade - Many Depend On Hashish For A Living (Britain's 'Guardian' Says Moroccan Authorities, Under Pressure From Europe, Where Three-Quarters Of Crop Ends Up - Started Crackdown On Hashish Market Six Years Ago, When 10,000 Troops Were Stationed On Northern Coast To Patrol Trafficking Routes - But Results Mixed And Government's Grip On Rebellious Berbers Is Slipping Even While There's 'A New Generation Making Themselves Rich') Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 14:11:57 -0800 To: mapnews@mapinc.org From: Olafur BrentmarSubject: MN: UK: Crackdown Fails To Curb Morocco's Drugs Trade Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Newshawk: Zosimos Pubdate: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 Source: The Guardian, UK Author: David Sharrock Contact: letters@guardian.co.uk CRACKDOWN FAILS TO CURB MOROCCO'S DRUGS TRADE Many depend on hashish for a living. Ask any teenage northern Moroccan male what his future will be and he will tell you he has three options: to escape across the sea to Europe; become a contraband dealer; or get into the hashish trade and end up either rich or in prison. Mohamed, who has tried all three, is the perfect guide to Morocco's "green gold" hashish economy. We drive north out of Tangier along the coast before turning inland into the foothills of the Rif mountains. At Oued Alian 50 fishermen are crowded around a small catch. "This is one of the most important places for sending the hashish across Spain," says Mohamed, gesturing towards the windsurfers' paradise-town of Tarifa across the straits. "It's like a river - very easy to cross. Of course, it's easy to get caught too, if you don't pay the baksheesh or if the government's wanting to clean up. Most of the big dealers are in prison now but there's a new generation making themselves rich." Under pressure from the European Union, in particular Spain, the Moroccan authorities have cracked down on the 'kif' (hashish) market, but with mixed results. The offensive began six years ago, when 10,000 troops were stationed on the northern coast to patrol trafficking routes. Tangier became the focus of police work and a number of drug barons were jailed. The people of Tangier say the crackdown was too harsh. "They have squeezed the life out of Tangier, there's no trickle-down effect any more from the hashish trade and every sector has suffered," laments one ex-pat. Cynics note that not all the Mister Bigs were rounded up; some suggest that politicians' names were linked to the investigations. The authorities admit that about 173,000 acres of land in the Rif region are under cannabis cultivation; unofficial statistics put the figure even higher. "Five years ago you had to drive right into the Rif to see the plantations," says Mohamed. "Now it's coming closer to Tangier all the time. It was within 40km [25 miles] last year." The October harvest was a bumper crop, yielding about 30 tonnes of cannabis. It is a tricky problem to solve, because the government's grip on the rebellious Berber people of the north has never been absolute. Attempts to produce alternative cash crops have produced few results. Cannabis fetches 10 times the price of wheat. "Without kif we would starve," says Mohamed. Production is therefore quietly tolerated while the authorities go after the dealers. Three-quarters of the cannabis grown in the Rif is destined for Europe. The Moroccans claim to have broken about 30 drugs networks in 1996-97, arresting 34 Britons, 126 Spaniards, 59 French and 25 Dutch. Those captured were mostly couriers rather than the drug chiefs. In a sinister development last year, six tonnes of cocaine washed up on Morocco's shores. A Spanish-registered vessel sailing out of Southampton had dumped its cargo after engine failure forced the Colombian crew to shelter in Moroccan waters. The Moroccans used the incident to support their contention that the drugs trade is international and that Europe should not blame Morocco for all its drug problems. "We are left to police Europe's southern shores alone," a government official said. "European aid to combat drugs in north Morocco is feeble, if not non-existent."
------------------------------------------------------------------- DrugSense Weekly, Number 33 (Summary Of Drug Policy News For Activists - Includes Original Commentary And Articles, 'Hepatitis C - HCV - And Harm Reduction,' Part One, And, DrugSense To Sponsor E-Mail Forum For Students) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 1998 07:51:58 -0800 To: mgreer@mapinc.org From: Mark Greer (MGreer@mapinc.org) Subject: DrugSense Weekly February 11, 1998 No. 33, *** DRUGSENSE WEEKLY DrugSense Weekly February 11, 1998 No. 33 A DrugSense publication http://www.drugsense.org *** TABLE OF CONTENTS: Feature Article - The Hepatitis C Epidemic-Implications for Drug Policy by Tom O'Connell & Joey Tranchina *** Weekly News In Review Domestic News - Medical Marijuana Medical Marijuana: Doing the Science *** The Drug War- Drug Seizure Drop Worries U.S. Customs Just Say No to Prison Drug Testing *** Opioids- UK: Deaths from Heroin Overdose are Preventable *** Cocaine- Fetal 'Crack' Exposure: Effects Questioned *** International News- Mexico: CIA Links Mexico's Interior Minister To Drug Lords Mexico: US, Mexico Reach Agreement On Drug Fight (in two papers) UK: The Drugs World War #2- What went wrong? UK: OPED: The Drugs World War #3- What Do We Do Now? *** Hot Off The 'Net DrugSense to Sponsor e-mail Forum for Students *** DrugSense Tip Of The Week Subscribing and Unsubscribing from various lists and services *** FEATURE ARTICLE The Hepatitis C Epidemic- Implications for Drug Policy: Part I By: Tom O'Connell, M.D. and Joey Tranchina, M.A. Hepatitis, literally "inflammation of the liver," is a term now reserved for viral infections as opposed to inflammation caused by other agents, such as bacteria, parasites, or chemicals. As with any illness, knowledge of hepatitis has accumulated incrementally. After long suspecting a virus, research initially identified two diseases caused by different viruses; Hepatitis A (HVA) usually acquired through the intestinal tract and Hepatitis B (HVB) usually acquired parenterally (by injection or inoculation directly into tissues).Immunity to both viruses is usually complete and both can be transmitted by sexual activity during the active phase. The clinical course is similar, except that HCA is usually much milder. Because some patients seemed to have a third form of hepatitis, a third virus, referred to for years as "non A-non B," was suspected. That suspicion was confirmed In 1989 by discovery of the Hepatitis C virus (HCV). A number of variants or sub-types have since been identified. Further research has characterized the disease complex caused by HCV more completely; the accumulated information has great significance for not only for injecting drug users, but all concerned with either public health or drug policy. HCV, the Illness Most of the estimated 4,000,000 Americans with HCV face a far more insidious illness than that produced by either A or B. While the initial infection may be mild and without jaundice, recovery for 85% of patients is incomplete and the virus establishes long-term residence in their blood, liver, and other organs. The symptoms produced by this chronic infection range from none at all to debilitating. There also seems to be increased susceptibility to many other illnesses, particularly auto-immune diseases. Finally, a significant percentage develop chronic active hepatitis, which may lead eventually to cirrhosis (dense scarring) of the liver decades later, particularly in heavy users of alcohol. Hepatitis C induced cirrhosis is now the most frequent indication for liver transplantation in the United States. A significant percentage also develop liver cancer (hepatoma). Spread of HCV HCV is can be spread to susceptible patients by inoculation of contaminated blood or tissue fluid. A collateral benefit of identifying HCV is that we can now screen donor blood and have thus nearly eliminated spread via transfusion or blood products. Spread to and from health workers is possible, but is minimized when standard procedures (including gloves) are used. Injecting drug users (IDUs), who now constitute the largest reservoir of HCV in the general population, also represent the most important mode of spread, although sexual and placental transmission occur rarely. Far hardier than HIV and more abundant in host blood, HCV is much more easily transmitted via contaminated needles and syringes. Most importantly, it can be transmitted by seemingly trivial blood contamination occurring when infected and non-infected drug users "shoot up" together, even though they may not directly share either needles or syringes. The implications of this latter observation are critical when it is realized that the prevalence of HCV infection among injection drug users (IDUs) in the United States has been tested at 100% in at least one group (Anchorage, AK) and is estimated to be over 80%, nationally. A Seattle study estimates that novice drug injectors face a 30% risk of HCV the first time they use, if assisted in any way by an established IDU. Beyond injection, there is evidence that communal snorting of cocaine or heroin, when sharing the device used for snorting, allows enough blood-to-blood contact to transmit the disease. The risks of communal snorting are not as great as communal injecting and haven't been quantitatively assessed, but are significant. Thus, the challenge is to educate two populations: established users and potential users. All who have engaged in "risky behavior" at any time should be tested and adapt their behavior accordingly, The degree to which paraphernalia laws and non-availability of sterile equipment favor transmission of HCV is obvious. The problem with HCV, as opposed to HIV is more nearly one of quarantine, i.e. of confining the disease to those already infected. The mode of transmission of HCV should be a powerful argument against novice experimentation with drug injection, but it's an argument which can only be made in a setting of knowledge endorsed my recognized public health authorities. So far, there has been no evidence of any such focused campaign even being considered by the federal government, despite recent allocation of $195 million for standard drug war propaganda. The price we are paying for doctrinaire paraphernalia laws is an opportunity to offer an intelligent reason to "just say no," as well as knowledge that would allow those who refuse to say "no" to at least change their behavior. Readers are invited to apply the principles of harm reduction in an epidemic of this nature. We will explore the changing roles for and increased demands upon harm reduction/NEP in Part II. *** WEEKLY NEWS IN REVIEW *** Domestic News *** Medical Marijuana MEDICAL MARIJUANA: DOING THE SCIENCE COMMENT: Thanks to Carl Olsen, we have this informative interview, originally published in Synapse in Nov. '97. It covers, in comprehensible language, important insights underlying current research in the mechanisms of cannabis modulation of pain. The entire interview should be downloaded and archived. Hopefully, the last exchange between the interviewer and the researcher (IM) may stimulate you to do this: Synapse: Has your life changed since your paper was published? IM: (laughs) A little bit. One part is people calling up wanting to know how they can get this drug to help them, because there are a lot of people with really severe chronic pain for whom nothing to this point has worked. So we've gotten some calls like that. Then you've got reporters calling, wanting to know how it affects the whole political debate. Synapse: And what's your line on that? IM: My line is that it should be legal. It definitely should be legal for people who need it to help with an illness or a disease like chronic pain or epilepsy. And cannabis can really help. Basically the science is just showing that there are very specific mechanisms by which the cannabis can help. People are taking this as a medicine, and for very specific reasons. It's hard to get that point through. Synapse: We've all had a lifetime of prejudice and propaganda. IM: Absolutely... It's satisfying to really do the science. Newshawk: "Carl E. Olsen" (carl@commonlink.net) Pubdate: November 20, 1997 Source: Synapse Contact: webmaster@synapse.ucsf.edu Fax: 415-555-FISH Website: http://itsa.ucsf.edu/~synapse/ Note: Synapse is a weekly student-written publication with an estimated readership of 9,000 at The University of California, San Francisco. http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v98.n083.a03.html/all *** The Drug War *** DRUG SEIZURE DROP WORRIES U.S. CUSTOMS COMMENT: This very interesting admission points up the intrinsic irresponsibility of classic US drug policy and the shallow nature of its doctrinal underpinnings. Even while acknowledging for years that interdiction is ineffective as a strategy in preventing foreign drugs from reaching US markets, we have continued to finance a major annual interdiction effort. Since no one is prepared to argue that the dramatic fall-off in the amount of drugs seized represents a drug war "victory," one is forced to conclude that these figures, combined with the startling increase in purity of drugs sold on the street represent both a new phase in the maturation of the criminal drug market and a new low in drug warrior efficiency. *** Agency says 84% dip in 1997 may bring backlash from Congress. Officials hope that a new interdiction strategy will improve performance. SAN DIEGO--The amount of cocaine seized at the commercial ports of entry along the U.S.-Mexico border plummeted 84% in 1997, forcing U.S. Customs Service officials to develop a new drug-fighting strategy and leaving them concerned about a backlash in Congress. Bill Heffelsinger, assistant to acting customs Commissioner Samuel H. Banks, said Tuesday that inspectors working at the high-risk commercial ports on the Southwest border confiscated 2,383 pounds of cocaine last year, compared to 15,114 pounds in 1996. Nationwide, the quantity of cocaine seized by the agency dropped 15% last year to 159,475 pounds, compared to 187,947 pounds in 1996, Heffelsinger added. The total number of seizures by customs agents and inspectors of all kinds of drugs was a record 26,240 nationwide last year, authorities said. (snip) Newshawk: Jim Rosenfield Source: Los Angeles Times Contact: letters@latimes.com Fax: 213-237-4712 Pubdate: February 4, 1998 Author: H.G. REZA, Times Staff Writer http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v98.n083.a09.html/all *** JUST SAY NO TO PRISON DRUG TESTING Source: SF Chronicle (Op-ed) COMMENT: Sheriff Hennessey's earnest confusion leads him to endorse the right idea - reject routine testing of prisoners - but for the wrong reason. Instead of ineffective coerced "treatment" of inmates, Hennessey favors equally ineffective coerced "treatment" of different segments of the population more transiently under the control of the criminal justice system. This is a classic example focusing on the deck chairs while the iceberg looms. What else is new? The "unbearable taxpayer costs" the Sheriff refers to could be avoided altogether by not incarcerating drug users. *** By Michael Hennessey A couple of weeks ago, front page headlines said,"President Clinton to Reduce Drug Use in Prison." The president's policy calls for states to drug test inmates and to report annually on drug use in prisons. This policy might sound good, but it is misguided and it doesn't enhance public safety. It may even hurt crime prevention by diverting funds from more effective programs, such as drug treatment. Getting people to stop using drugs in prison is not nearly as important as stopping them from using drugs outside of prison. The White House contends that "coerced abstinence" while in prison will reduce the addicts' demand for drugs after release. Ridiculous! Does the absence of heterosexual relationships in prison lessen a prisoner's interest in sex after release from prison? I don't think so. (snip) The National District Attorney's Association, commenting on the Califano Report, stated: "Simply warehousing prisoners, without regard to addressing and dealing with the underlying problem of substance abuse, produces unbearable taxpayer costs." (snip) Michael Hennessey is the sheriff of the City and County of San Francisco. His pioneering efforts to rehabilitate prisoners include education and substance abuse recovery programs. http://chronletters@sfgate.com Pub Date: 2/6/98 Newshawk: Tom O'Connell tjeffoc@sirius.com Subj: US CA: OPED: Just Say No to Prison Drug Testing From: Tom O'Connell Date: Sat, 7 Feb 1998 21:53:36 -0800 Size: 75 lines 3878 bytes File: v98.n089.a11 http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v98.n089.a11.html *** OPIOIDS *** DEATHS FROM HEROIN OVERDOSE ARE PREVENTABLE COMMENT: The harm reduction implications of this study are inescapable: Not only would relaxed paraphernalia laws reduce the spread of AIDS from injection drug use, easier access to Narcan would save many people who currently die of heroin overdose. A thousand deaths from heroin overdose each year could be prevented in Britain if emergency resuscitation drugs were supplied to addicts and their close contacts, according to a report presented to the Royal College of Psychiatrists' winter meeting last week. Professor John Strang, director of the National Addiction Centre at the Maudsley Hospital in London, suggested that premature deaths from drug overdoses account for the increased mortality among opiate addicts. A survey of heroin addicts in south London showed that over half of those undergoing treatment had overdosed in the past. These overdoses, however, were rarely suicide attempts. (snip) Newshawk: Andrew Byrne (ajbyrne@ozemail.com.au)thru ADCA Source: British Medical Journal (No 7128 Volume 316) Author: Kamran Abbasi BMJ Pubdate: Saturday, 31 Jan 1998 Contact: The Editor, BMJ, BMA House, Tavistock Square, London WC1H http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v98.n081.a08.html/all Fax: +44 (0)171 383 6418/6299 Email: bmj@bmj.com *** COCAINE FETAL 'CRACK' EXPOSURE: EFFECTS QUESTIONED COMMENT: This news article concludes that the original "crack baby" scare stories were greatly exaggerated, but holds out the possibility that intrauterine exposure might have subtle detrimental effects which haven't yet become clear. By implication, these effects would have to be less that those of alcohol and tobacco which have already been well documented. As usual. there is reluctance to emphasize the relatively good news about a demonized drug along with the need to emphasize potential bad news. *** NEW YORK (Reuters) -- Initial reports of permanently damaged "crack babies" may have been greatly exaggerated, according to pediatric researchers. However, they caution that the long-term impact of fetal cocaine exposure upon child development still remains largely unknown. Research involving over 300 newborns led experts at the University of Florida in Gainesville, to conclude that "we have few data to warrant the alarm that grew out of earlier reports, often fueled by the media, of the possible devastating effects of prenatal cocaine-exposure." (snip) Standard psychological testing revealed no significant differences in overall intellectual performance among the two groups of newborns. However, according to Eyler, more subtle behavioral differences emerged during subsequent testing. (snip) Newshawk: Marcus-Mermelstein Family (mmfamily@ix.netcom.com) Source: Reuters Pubdate: Tue, 3 Feb 1998 Author: E.J. Mundell Reuters source: Pediatrics (1998;101(2):229-237, 237-241) http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v98.n087.a06.html *** International News *** MEXICO *** CIA LINKS MEXICO'S INTERIOR MINISTER TO DRUG LORDS COMMENT: Given the profound depths of the corruption already (grudgingly) revealed to affect the Mexican bureaucracy, it's doubtful that anyone who has risen to a responsible level in the Mexican government remains above suspicion. Still, McCaffrey, in his role as chief spokesman for the drug war, can be counted upon to rush down to the border on cue and heap lavish praise on the next stooge they come up with. It's ironic that the CIA should be the source of these charges. Is the kettle getting a chance to play the role of pot for a change? Mexico's new interior minister, the second-most-powerful official in the country and a likely candidate for the presidency, has been linked by the CIA to international narcotics traffickers. Francisco Labastida Ochoa has "long-standing ties" to drug dealers since serving as governor of the state of Sinaloa for six years, according to a report labeled "top secret" that was obtained by The Washington Times from agency sources. (snip) Newshawk: "Frank S. World" (compassion23@geocities.com) Pubdate: Thu, 05 Feb 1998 Source: The Washington Times Author: Bill Gertz, The Washington Times Contact: letter@twtmail.com Website: http://www.washtimes.com/ http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v98.n090.a06.html *** US- MEXICO REACH AGREEMENT ON DRUG FIGHT Author: David Lagesse of the Dallas Morning News Also appeared in the San Jose Mercury-News under the headline: MEXICO MAKE PACT ON EFFORTS TO FIGHT DRUGS COMMENT: Whoops! As noted in the comment on the other article, no sooner is a Mexican official appointed to a sensitive "anti-drug" position, and McC endorses him, than the charges start to fly. Poor Mac, maybe he can be persuaded to wait a few weeks before endorsing the next high ranking appointment. *** WASHINGTON -- The United States and Mexico announced an agreement Friday that administration officials and outside analysts said would help to ensure continued U.S. certification of the Mexican anti-drug effort. Coming after nearly a year of negotiation, the pact outlines broad areas of cooperation between the governments. But it lacks specific commitments and is unlikely to silence the sharp congressional criticism of Mexico's commitment, one skeptic said Friday. (snip) Colombia ranks as the largest producer of cocaine that makes its way to the United States, while Mexico serves as the leading transportation pipeline, according to U.S. analysts. The Clinton administration has given Colombia a failing grade the past two years, which cost the country some U.S. financial aid. The administration, however, approved Mexico's efforts despite widespread reports of corruption among top-ranking Mexican officials. (snip) McCaffrey on Friday endorsed another Mexican official who was accused of associating with traffickers. ``The Washington Times'' this week said a CIA report fingered Mexico's new interior minister, Francisco Labastida Ochoa, with ``long-standing ties'' to drug dealers when he was governor of the Mexican state of Sinaloa. ``I personally have no evidence of allegations of this nature that I would find compelling, and we have no intention of going to the Mexican government about allegations of this nature on this gentleman,'' McCaffrey said. ``We intend to work with him.'' (snip) Contact: (1) letterstoeditor@dallasnews.com Website: (1) http://www.dallasnews.com Contact: (2) letters@sjmercury.com Website: (2) http://www.sjmercury.com/ Pubdate: Sat, 7 Feb 1998 Newshawk: David.Hadorn@vuw.ac.nz (David Hadorn), Zosimos (mjc1947@cyberclub.iol.ie), Marcus-Mermelstein Family (mmfamily@ix.netcom.com) http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v98.n089.a13.html *** U. K. *** THE DRUGS WORLD WAR - WHAT WENT WRONG? In this second of a three part series, Knightley provides a valuable international overview and analysis of US drug war policy. His citingof the action of State Department Undersecretary Gelbard in scuttling the recently attempted heroin trial in Australia is far more accurate and perceptive than anything I have seen in the mainstream American media. This whole series should be archived on everyone's hard drive. It should also be circulated by fax, or by printing and mailing it to your most resistantly Luddite friends and acquaintaces. *** Part Two The fight against drugs has been lost. Yet the US right continues to squander vital resources on a worldwide, irrational crusade to rein in the 'evil perpetrators' By Phillip Knightley THE 25-year-old war against drugs has been lost but there are still bitter-enders on both sides of the Atlantic who want to fight on. Like American generals in Vietnam, they believe they see a light at the end of the tunnel. Realists know that, rightly or wrongly, the campaign is over. Imagine a courtroom scene in Oklahoma. The prosecutor is suggesting to the jury the sentence it should recommend for a man who has been found guilty of possession of cannabis. "Two hundred years, two thousand years . Just pick a number and see how many zeros you can add on," he says. "Put this druggie away and God will bless you all." They did, and Will Foster, a computer software consultant, married with two children, is now serving 93 years for growing marijuana plants for cigarettes to relieve his chronic rheumatoid arthritis. (snip) What is behind the irrational passion that the United States brings to the war on drugs? What is it that motivates one American anti-drugs campaigner, William Bennett, to call for the beheading of drug dealers, and the former police chief of Los Angeles to suggest that even casual users should be taken out of the courtroom after conviction and immediately shot? (snip) Ethan A Nadelmann, director of the Lindesmith Center, a New York drug-policy research institute, says: "The only reason for the failure to prescribe adequate doses of pain-relieving opiates is the "opiaphobia" that causes doctors to ignore the medical evidence, nurses to turn away from their patients' cries of pain, and some patients themselves elect to suffer debilitating and demoralizing pain rather than submit to a proper dose of drugs." Such is the moral conviction of the drugs war warriors that it is difficult to engage them in rational debate. Dr Thomas Szasz of the department of Psychiatry at Syracuse University suggests that it is a waste of time presenting facts to the anti-drug lobby to convince them that the war is lost. He says that the war on drugs is a mass movement characterized by the demonising of certain objects and persons - "drugs", "addicts", "traffickers" - as the incarnations of evil. Hence it is foolish to dwell on the drug prohibitionist's failure to attain his avowed aims. "Since he wages war on evil, his very effort is synonymous with success." Newshawk: Zosimos (mjc1947@cyberclub.iol.ie) Pubdate: 1 February 1998 Source: Independent on Sunday Contact: sundayletters@independent.co.uk Related: http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v98.n062.a01.html http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v98.n076.a06.html/all Mail: Independent on Sunday 1 Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London E14 5DL England *** THE DRUGS WORLD WAR - WHAT DO WE DO NOW? COMMENT: This is the third and last article in an extraordinary series printed by the Independent. Again, DrugSense readers are urged to download and archive all three (the URLs are listed below). This segment looks at the drug war as an economic phenomenon and examines some little-appreciated ways in which illegal drug money is folded back into the legal economy. It then cites several examples of modern youth ignoring false drug war doctrine and explodes, one after the other, the conventional justifications for retaining an illegal market. The series ends on a weak note: although concluding that the drug war is irretrievably lost, no coherent post prohibition model is suggested, nor is there any mechanism suggested for forcing the ruling power structure to acknowledge the failure of its policy or any scenario as to how this might come about. Part 3 While governments wage unwinnable war against drugs, ordinary people are facing the truth: the 'enemy' is already among us and, accepted if not yet acceptable, is here to stay. THE world war on drugs has been lost because everyone under-estimated the power of the profit motive on the supply side, and the attractions of drugs on the demand side. We have seen how all the law enforcement agencies in the world cannot impede a business where the mark-up can be as high as 22,000 per cent. At any given time some $5bn made from drugs is sloshing around the international monetary system. Inevitably, some of it filters into the world of legitimate finance. (snip) But elsewhere in Europe, experts say that City institutions actually relish the flood of dirty money pouring in from places such as Russia. They say, further, that it may be safer in the long-term that drugs money is laundered and goes into legitimate financing, rather than moving unaccountably through the black economy. (snip) And then there are others with an interest in the war continuing - the prison builders, the drug-testing companies, the professional anti-drugs education programmes, the extra police and parole officers called up for the battle. Not to mention those who have been corrupted, (snip) SINCE THE WAR on drugs has been lost, it is logical that we should be planning what to do next. There is no chance in the immediate future of such a discussion taking place in the United States. (snip) But both agree that the war on drugs has failed, and that there should be a movement towards legalisation. (snip) The war against drugs is part of the last great authoritarian campaign of this century - the attempt to tell us what one can and cannot do to one's own body. The debate is raging over abortion and euthanasia, but not drugs. It cannot be too early to discuss what we should do when the crusaders against drugs finally admit defeat. Newshawk: Zosimos (mjc1947@cyberclub.iol.ie) Pubdate: Sun, 08 Feb 1998 Source: Independent on Sunday Author: Phillip Knightley Contact: sundayletters@independent.co.uk Mail: IoS, 1 Canada Square, Canary Wharf, London E14 5DL, England http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v98.n062.a01.html (1) http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v98.n076.a06.html/all (2) http://www.mapinc.org/drugnews/v98.n092.a10.html (3) *** HOT OFF THE 'NET *** DRUGSENSE TO OPEN UNIVERSITY DRUG POLICY FORUM DrugSense will sponsor an e-mail discussion group to provide university students and faculty with a national forum in which to discuss drug policy and related issues. . Josh Sinoway, a second year political science student at the University of California at Santa Cruz, will be the host. Josh comes by his interest in drug policy in 2 ways: first, as son of Ron Sinoway, long time reform activist and second as a survivor of the quasi-military helicopter interdiction campaign waged for years against all residents of California's "Emerald Triangle," whether they are pot growers or not. Josh will bring an unabashedly reformist attitude to the forum, and has the ultimate goal of organizing nationwide reform projects involving students. His e-mail address is: (jsinoway@drugsense.org) Check here next week for details. *** TIP OF THE WEEK *** MAPTalk - There is an email list called MAPTalk where letter writers and readers of the DrugSense Weekly share ideas. We hope that you will either join MAPTalk or forward a copy of your letters to MGreer@mapinc.org so that they can be shared with other interested reformers. We get occasional requests from people who want to subscribe or unsubscribe from MAP or other reform lists. Here are step by step "canned" instructions. Please save them. Two ways to un subscribe and subscribe to or from MAP, DRC, and other reform mailing lists: WAY ONE http://www.mapinc.org/ The easiest way, by far, to subscribe or unsubscribe to a whole pile of reform mailing lists is the MAP web page. If you are able to get on the Internet go to http://www.mapinc.org/ and click (with your mouse) on "Mailing Lists" (at the bottom of the home page) select MAP Mailing lists, DRC, or whatever. Next click on "Subscribe/Unsubscribe." Now click on the little arrow on subscribe and then click on subscribe or unsubscribe. Click on the little down arrow next to the various list names and select which list you want to get on or off. Fill in your name and email address, send and you're done. This is a wonderful way for busy people like you to quickly and easily log on or off lists and occasionally "look in." It takes just a minute or two and eliminates having to remember all the various commands and addresses. While you're on the MAP web page look around at the wonderful enhancements such as our activist database sign up form (under "Sign me up") and the incredible list of LTEs we've had published in the last few months (under "MAP gets Published") If you don't know how to "surf the net" Here are the instructions: WAY TWO FOR THE "INTERNET CHALLENGED" To subscribe to MAPTalk send a message to majordomo@mapinc.org For DRC lists send to listproc@drcnet.org put _subscribe MAPTalk (or DRCTalk etc.) firstname lastname_ (The name is optional for MAP but mandatory for DRC) in the body of the message (insert your first name and last name - no dashes). You will receive a confirmation that you are subscribed. Example: subscribe MAPTalk Barry McCaffrey To unsubscribe from DRC lists send a message to listproc@drcnet.org with unsubscribe (list name) in the body of the message. You will receive a confirmation that you are unsubscribed. Example unsubscribe DRCTalk To un subscribe from MAP lists send a message to majordomo@mapinc.org with un subscribe (list name) in the body of the message. You will receive a confirmation that you are unsubscribed. Example unsubscribe MAPTalk This works for DRCTalk, other DRC lists (like the MMJ list WWW list) and many other lists as well. Again make your life easier and use the web page above. It is a gift from the gods. Hope this helps. WAY THREE the MAP database To be added to the MAP *database* (IE to receive or stop receiving FOCUS alerts or the newsletter) do the following: To be added go to http://www.mapinc.org/join.htm and fill out the form. Alternately, if you are in a hurry, you can go to http://www.drugsense.org/hurry.htm and fill out the "short form" in a few seconds. This will give us only minimal info on you and at some point you should fill out the "long form" so that we can serve your needs better. Visit http://www.drugsense.org/unsub.htm to be removed from our database and/or unsubscribe from the Drugnews-Digest, DrugSense Weekly Newsletter and weekly Focus Alerts. *** DS Weekly is one of the many free educational services DrugSense offers our members. Watch this feature to learn more about what DrugSense can do for you. Editor: Tom O'Connell, tjeffoc@sirius.com Senior Editor: Mark Greer, mgreer@mapinc.org Comments: Tom O'Connell, tjeffoc@sirius.com We wish to thank our contributors. NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. Mark Greer Media Awareness Project (MAP) inc. d/b/a DrugSense MGreer@mapinc.org http://www.DrugSense.org/ http://www.mapinc.org -------------------------------------------------------------------
[End]
The articles posted here are generally copyrighted by the source publications. They are reproduced here for educational purposes under the Fair Use Doctrine (17 U.S.C., section 107). NORML is a 501 (c)(3) non-profit educational organization. The views of the authors and/or source publications are not necessarily those of NORML. The articles and information included here are not for sale or resale.
Comments, questions and suggestions.
Reporters and researchers are welcome at the world's largest online library of drug-policy information, sponsored by the Drug Reform Coordination Network at: http://www.druglibrary.org/
Next day's news
Previous day's news
to 1998 Daily News index for February 5-11
to Portland NORML news archive directory
to 1998 Daily News index (long)
This URL: http://www.pdxnorml.org/980211.html