-------------------------------------------------------------------
The Week Online with DRCNet, Issue No. 70 (The Drug Reform Coordination
Network's original summary of drug policy news and calls to action,
including - Exemplary citizen to be extradited on 25-year-old $10 marijuana
conviction; Supreme Court strikes down car search law; Congressional report -
Citibank facilitated Salinas money laundering; Exciting resources available
online; Job opportunity; Fellowships and academic opportunities; Giving
the gift of hope; and an editorial by Adam J. Smith, Human rights declared
but not observed.)
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 02:47:40 -0500
To: drc-natl@drcnet.org
From: DRCNet (drcnet@drcnet.org)
Subject: The Week Online with DRCNet, Issue No. 70
Sender: owner-drc-natl@drcnet.org
The Week Online with DRCNet, Issue No. 70 -- December 11, 1998
A Publication of the Drug Reform Coordination Network
-------- PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE --------
(To sign off this list, mailto:listproc@drcnet.org with the
line "signoff drc-natl" in the body of the message, or
mailto:lists@drcnet.org for assistance. To subscribe to
this list, visit http://www.drcnet.org/signup.html.)
(This issue can be also be read on our web site at
http://www.drcnet.org/wol/070.html. Check out the DRCNN
weekly radio segment at http://www.drcnet.org/drcnn/.)
PERMISSION to reprint or redistribute any or all of the
contents of The Week Online is hereby granted. We ask that
any use of these materials include proper credit and, where
appropriate, a link to one or more of our web sites. If
your publication customarily pays for publication, DRCNet
requests checks payable to the organization. If your
publication does not pay for materials, you are free to use
the materials gratis. In all cases, we request notification
for our records, including physical copies where material
has appeared in print. Contact: Drug Reform Coordination
Network, 2000 P St., NW, Suite 615, Washington, DC 20036,
(202) 293-8340 (voice), (202) 293-8344 (fax), e-mail
drcnet@drcnet.org. Thank you.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Exemplary Citizen to be Extradited on 25 Year-Old $10
Marijuana Conviction
http://www.drcnet.org/wol/070.html#25years
2. Supreme Court Strikes Down Car Search Law
http://www.drcnet.org/wol/070.html#nosearch
3. CONGRESSIONAL REPORT: Citibank Facilitated Salinas Money
Laundering
http://www.drcnet.org/wol/070.html#citibank
4. Exciting Resources Available Online
http://www.drcnet.org/wol/070.html#resources
5. Job Opportunity
http://www.drcnet.org/wol/070.html#opportunity
6. Fellowships and Academic Opportunities
http://www.drcnet.org/wol/070.html#grants
7. Giving the Gift of Hope
http://www.drcnet.org/wol/070.html#givinghope
8. EDITORIAL: Human Rights Declared but Not Observed
http://www.drcnet.org/wol/070.html#editorial
***
1. Exemplary Citizen to be Extradited on 25 Year-Old $10
Marijuana Conviction
[NOTE TO OUR READERS: We present this story as it poses an
interesting ethical question. Is escape an ethical response
to a conviction under a bad policy? Even if the convicted
would have served only three months time? And should
twenty-five years of exemplary life cause a prosecutor to
choose not to seek the return of such an escapee? It is, in
the end, the odd outcome of a flawed system, and we offer
here the perspectives of the attorneys on either side.]
Alfred Martin will be heading back to Virginia after a
Michigan court ordered him extradited on charges that he
walked away from a one year prison sentence in 1974.
(Martin was sentenced to ten years, but all but one year of
the sentence was suspended.) Martin had been sentenced for
selling $10 worth of marijuana to a co-worker, and now faces
charges of escape, as well as theft by conversion for
failing to complete payments on a stereo and a television
that he had bought on installment shortly before his
original arrest and conviction.
Martin, a broker for the Mortgage Company of Michigan, had
led "an exemplary life since his conviction," according to
Judge William Callahan, who nevertheless ruled in favor of
the state of Virginia. Callahan also said that Martin and
his family had been "a credit to the state" during their
twenty-five years in Michigan.
Virginia had tried once before to have Martin extradited, in
1976. At that time, then-Governor William Milikan granted
him legal asylum in Michigan. Since that time, however,
several Supreme Court rulings have supported the rights of
states to retrieve persons from other states regardless of
the circumstances.
Gregory R. Neidle, Martin's attorney, told The Week Online,
"the prosecutor (Joan Ziglar of Martinsville, VA) materially
misrepresented Mr. Martin's situation both to the Governor
of Virginia and to the Michigan court. There was no
indication in any of her papers that my client had
previously fought this for three years resulting in the
granting of asylum. Legally, therefore, we believe that Mr.
Martin has been wrongly extradited. From the standpoint of
justice, he is a man who had no record prior to his arrest
twenty-five years ago, and he's had no record since he's
arrived in Michigan. He's a mortgage broker, a successful
man, with a wife of twenty-six years and three children.
There is absolutely no reasonable justification for sending
Alfred Martin back to prison."
Joan Ziglar has been the prosecutor in the town of
Martinsville, population 16,000, for just under a year.
Martinsville, she says, has a serious drug problem, in part
due to its midpoint status between New York and Florida.
According to Ziglar, approximately 70% of her cases are
either directly or indirectly drug-related. She spoke with
The Week Online:
WOL: Mr. Martin walked away from his sentence almost twenty-
five years ago. Why, after all this time, did you decide to
pursue this case?
Ziglar: When I was first elected, I sat down with my staff
to discuss our priorities. One of those priorities was to
pursue extradition of felons who had fled the jurisdiction.
Mr. Martin fits that description and when the state of
Michigan notified us that they had stopped him, I reopened
his file just like I would for any other fugitive. I would
also mention that unlike other extradition cases, where
someone has fled before trial, Mr. Martin had been convicted
here. He had escaped from detention.
WOL: But even the judge in Michigan commented that he had
led an exemplary life there. What do you hope to accomplish
by putting him back in jail?
Ziglar: Well, there are others here who are awaiting trial,
and I want them all to know that if you run, no matter how
far or long, we will come after you. So you might as well
stay and take your medicine now. I also believe that we
have to send a message that we will fight drugs, even
marijuana. America is fed up with drugs, and I believe that
it is my job to fight for a safer America.
WOL: So now he will face his original sentence plus two
others, right?
Ziglar: Mr. Martin faces a maximum of five years for his
escape, and a maximum of twenty years for the felony theft-
by conversion charge. I would add that while he had
originally been sentenced to two five year terms, all but
six months of each of those had been suspended. And, going
by the parole rules in 1974, he would have only served a
total of three months of that year. Today, under truth in
sentencing, he would have had to serve 85% of that year.
WOL: And will you seek the maximum?
Ziglar: Other than cases such as murder, I never ask for a
specific sentence. I will argue to the jury that Mr. Martin
is guilty of the charges, and that he should be punished
appropriately. I will leave it to the jury to make the
determination on what that may be.
ACTION ITEM: If you have an opinion on this case, take a
moment to send a letter to one of the Virginia newspapers
listed below. You might want to mention that incarcerating
Mr. Martin, who clearly poses no danger to anyone, will cost
the taxpayers of Virginia upwards of $30,000 per year.
Letters to the Editor
Editorial Pages
Box 85333
Richmond,VA 23293
fax: (804) 775-8090
Letters to the Editor
Virginia Pilot
P.O. Box 449
Norfolk, VA 23501-0449
fax: (757) 446-2051
letters@pilotonline.com
Progress Index
15 Franklin
Petersburg, VA 23803
Please send us copies of your letters, to: DRCNet, 2000 P
St., NW, Suite 615, Washington, DC 20036, fax to (202) 293-
8344, or e-mail to alert-feedback@drcnet.org.
***
2. Supreme Court Strikes Down Car Search Law
- Hanna Liebman
The Supreme Court this week unanimously declared a whole
category of police searching unconstitutional, a rare
outcome for a court that has been seen as an automatic
rubberstamp for police conduct, especially as that conduct
relates to drug law enforcement. This week's decision
reversed the Iowa Supreme Court and threw out a marijuana
conviction when it held that a car may not be searched
merely based upon the issuance of a speeding ticket or other
traffic citation.
Patrick Knowles was stopped for going 43 in a 25-mile-an-
hour zone, and the officer issued a citation in lieu of
arrest (which is permitted in Iowa for minor offenses). The
officer then searched Mr. Knowles's passenger compartment,
and found marijuana and a pipe. The Supreme Court earlier
had approved a practice known as "search incident to
arrest," whereby officers may search a car fully if an
arrest is made. In Knowles, the Court said unequivocally
that the search incident to arrest doctrine does not extend
to situations when an arrest is not actually made.
The Court's opinion centered on the fact that there are two
justifications for the search incident doctrine -- danger to
the police, and preservation of evidence -- neither of which
is present during a traffic stop to the extent that they
outweigh the 4th Amendment concern. In an earlier case,
Whren v. United States, the Court had held that officers'
decisions to stop cars for traffic violations were not
subject to scrutiny as to the actual motivations as long as
there was probable cause as to traffic violations. Thus,
the Court here was not concerned with whether there was a
pretext in the Knowles stop of looking for drugs.
Though the issue was not raised here, it is important to
note that many rights violations do occur in the service of
drug enforcement. A good number of the landmark 4th
Amendment cases have included drug searches and seizures.
"Police are always looking for drugs, that's primarily the
area where they make warrantless searches," says Paul
Rosenberg of Des Moines, the attorney for Knowles. Adds
Brooklyn Law School professor Susan N. Herman, who filed an
amicus curiae brief in the case on behalf of the ACLU, often
police who stop vehicles are "not highly concerned with the
traffic. In Whren, they weren't even empowered to enforce
traffic laws, they were vice squad!"
While a line of previous decisions have broadened the powers
of officers in connection with car stops, the Knowles case
can be hailed as something of a victory for 4th Amendment
protections. Given that on the order of "50 million people
a year are cited for traffic violations, there's a huge
potential for abuse. I think everybody can be very happy
this opinion came down," notes Rosenberg. This case does
put a stop to a practice that some, such as Rosenberg, argue
was becoming more prevalent. "This was just a new monster
that was lurking," he says. "The Supreme Court basically
slammed the door."
But while Knowles is a clear indication that the Court will
not abide conduct that goes too far over the line, the
opinion does not represent a marked shift in 4th Amendment
jurisprudence, or in police behavior, warns professor
Herman. For one thing, police can circumvent the
prohibition by deciding to arrest the suspect, and then
declining to follow through with the arrest if no contraband
is discovered during the ensuing search. Herman calls that
tactic "arrest incident to search." Despite her contention
that the Knowles opinion is not a robust pronouncement of
4th Amendment values, Herman credits the opinion for what it
does do, which is prevent the police from having "incredibly
broad discretion to search any car" -- discretion, she says,
that "we do see...is exercised in an arbitrary... manner."
The Iowa Attorney General's office calls the practice of
search incident to citation "rarely used" and acknowledges
the Supreme Court's exhortation to police to use "other
procedures [that are] available if they are concerned for
their safety," such as ordering the occupants of a car to
disembark.
Meanwhile, attorney Rosenberg suggests that the real area in
which police need to look for other procedures is in
enforcing drug laws. "Officers have plenty of tools to deal
with drug laws without resorting to this," he points out.
***
3. CONGRESSIONAL REPORT: Citibank Facilitated Salinas Money
Laundering
A Congressional report, released last week (12/5) says that
executives of Citibank took in more than $100 million from
Raul Salinas, brother of ex-Mexican President Carlos
Salinas, and helped him to set up a complex web of offshore
shell corporations, without attempting to verify the source
of the money. Much of Salinas' fortune has since been
seized by the Swiss government on suspicion that it
represents protection money paid by drug traffickers.
The New York Times reports that Salinas' personal Citibank
banker advised him to move the money offshore in the wake of
his 1995 arrest for murder. According to the report,
Citibank officials did finally warn the U.S. government
about Salinas' suspicious transactions, but even then did
not tell the government about the network of accounts and
corporations that the bank had set up for him to shield the
money.
Federal officials say that they have yet to determine
whether or not Citibank broke any laws. According to the
Times, both the Justice Department and the Federal Reserve
Bank refused to cooperate with congressional investigators
compiling the report.
Money laundering, and efforts by the federal government to
attack the drug trade through the monitoring of financial
transactions, has become a contentious issue in recent
years. Frustrated in their attempts to make headway in the
drug war, federal agencies have sought greater and greater
powers both against financial institutions and individuals.
Currently, the federal government requires institutions to
report any transaction larger than $10,000. In addition,
federal regulators are hoping to see the 106th Congress pass
the controversial "Know Your Customer" legislation, which
will make financial institutions responsible for
investigating the source of nearly all of their clients
funds, as well as for monitoring all transactions to
determine if any "unusual" activity is instigated by a
client, regardless of the size of those transactions.
Earlier this year, "Operation Casablanca," an 18-month
investigation into drug-money laundering on both sides of
the U.S.-Mexican border, was hailed as a success by the
justice department. That operation netted $135 million,
according to government estimates, and several dozen
arrests, although none of those arrested were considered
high-level players. Critics questioned the impact of even
this "largest-ever" bust, when it has been estimated that
proceeds of the drug trade laundered back into the
legitimate economy total hundreds of billions of dollars
annually.
Many economists believe that the idea of money laundering is
itself problematic.
Richard Rahn, former Chief Economist of the United States
Chamber of Commerce and author of the book, "The End Of
Money: The Struggle For Financial Privacy" told The Week
Online, "In the first place, money laundering is very poorly
defined. So much so, in fact, that the government can pick
almost any financial institution, go through their records,
and make a case. Further, to make private industry
responsible for policing private citizens is an improper
abdication of the job of the enforcement agencies. There
are very many legitimate reasons why a person would want to
keep the details of financial transactions secret, and so
the requirements, which are in effect due to the
government's inability to enforce other laws, is invasive.
The record-keeping required of these institutions is also
quite costly and makes those businesses far less efficient.
"For my book, I did an analysis which found that the average
cost to taxpayers per conviction for money laundering is
over $100 million. And the truth is that in the digital
age, where money can be moved so quickly and easily around
the globe, only those who blunder will ever be caught.
Clearly the bulk of the problem of illicit money stems from
the unenforceable drug war. It is highly unlikely that we
will ever put so much as a dent in the trade. It is exactly
like Prohibition in the 1920's."
Read about the proposed "Know Your Customer" rules in Wired
Online's "Banking With Big Brother" article, online at
http://www.wired.com/news/news/politics/story/16749.html.)
Also worth checking out is the Dec. 10 issue of the Wall
Street Journal, available online for a fee, at
http://www.wsj.com. Richard Rahn is was interviewed for
this week's DRCNN radio show, previewable online at
http://www.drcnet.org/drcnn/.
***
4. Exciting Resources Available Online
"Drug War Facts," an extensive compilation of facts, stats
and general background on a wide range of drug policy
issues, is published online by Common Sense for Drug Policy
and updated monthly. Check out Drug War Facts at
http://www.csdp.org and visit it regularly to brush up on
your numbers, prep for your next debate, or enhance your
next letter to the editor.
"Win At All Costs," a landmark ten-part series that is the
fruit of a ten-year investigation into federal prosecutorial
misconduct, has been published by the Pittsburgh Post-
Gazette. The series, which will undoubtedly be considered
for a Pulitzer Prize, details a culture of lawlessness among
federal agents and prosecutors whose pursuit of convictions
has come to overshadow their ostensible role as seekers of
justice. You can find the series online at
http://www.post-gazette.com/win/.
Last week, famed Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz
granted an interview to DRCNet, in relation to his testimony
before the House Judiciary Committee regarding perjury.
Dershowitz touched on drug policy issues, and the corrosive
effect of drug enforcement on police scruples (see
http://www.drcnet.org/wol/069.html#perjury). We forgot to
mention that the testimony itself is available online, at
http://www.c-span.org/guide/executive/investigation/ --
follow the link to December 1.
The Lindesmith Center has a variety of new documents in its
online library, including a "focal point" compilation of the
research on safe injecting rooms, the National Research
Council's 1982 report, "An Analysis of Marijuana Policy,"
articles on methadone maintenance, use of herbicides in drug
crop eradication, Latin America drug policy, including
discussions of militarization and the certification process,
and more. Check out TLC's Recent Additions web page at
http://www.lindesmith.org/library/new.html.
***
5. Job Opportunity
The Lindesmith Center, a division of the Open Society
Institute, is seeking an experienced webmaster. Job
responsibilities will include creating new content for the
web site and online library; supervising part-time web
assistants; monitoring new additions to the hard copy
library; promoting the website by updating search engines;
acting as a liaison with public; planning design changes and
adding new technology; and troubleshooting.
Job requirements: BA, prior web site design/maintenance
experience essential; knowledge of web programming tools,
i.e. HTML, JavaScript, Real Media, PhotoShop, etc.;
excellent organizational skills; attentive to detail;
interest in/knowledge of drug policy issues preferred;
creative self-starter, able to work in fast-paced
professional environment; available immediately.
Send letter, resume, salary requirements, three references
to: Open Society Institute, Human Resources, Code WEB/TLC,
400 W. 59th Street, New York, New York 10019, or fax (212)
548-4663. The Open Society Institute is an Equal
Opportunity Employer.
***
6. Fellowships and Academic Opportunities
The Institute for Humane Studies at George Mason University
in Fairfax, Virginia will award nearly one half million
dollars to outstanding graduate and undergraduate students -
- fellowships range up to $12,000, and the deadline is
December 31. Humane Studies Fellowships are awarded by the
Institute for Humane Studies to support the work of
outstanding students interested in the "classical liberal"
tradition. Applications will be considered from those who
(1) will be a full-time graduate student or undergraduate
student with junior or senior standing in the 1999/00
academic year; (2) have a clearly demonstrated interest in
the classical liberal/libertarian tradition, and 3) are
interested in applying the principles of this tradition to
their work. For more info, visit http://www.TheIHS.org.
Substance Abuse Policy Research Program 1998, Round IV: The
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation is requesting proposals for
research projects that will produce policy-relevant
information about ways to reduce the harm caused by the use
of tobacco, alcohol, and illegal drugs, or any combination
thereof in the United States. This call for proposals is
intended to encourage experts in public health, law,
political science, medicine, sociology, criminal justice,
economics, and other behavioral and policy sciences to
address issues related to substance abuse, the nation's
number one health problem. Projects supported are expected
to increase understanding of public and private policy
interventions to reduce the harm caused by the use of
tobacco, alcohol, and illegal drugs; including the
advantages, disadvantages, and potential impact of these
policies. This program is intended to identify and assess
policies that can reduce the harm caused by substance abuse;
to analyze their feasibility, effectiveness, and likely
consequences; and to help ensure that the understanding
gained through these analyses will be used by decision
makers in the public and private sectors. Letters of intent
are due by December 16. For further information, visit
http://www.phs.wfubmc.edu/sshp/rwj/rwj.htm, or contact
Andrea Ebbers, Substance Abuse Policy Research Program,
Department of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University
School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem,
NC 27157-1063, (336) 716-9714.
***
7. Giving the Gift of Hope
Running out of time and still don't know what to give your
loved ones, friends or colleagues this holiday season?
Consider giving them a copy of Shattered Lives: Portraits
from America's Drug War -- it will be a powerful way of
letting them know that you care about them, this country,
and the injustice that is being perpetrated on a growing
segment of the population.
DRCNet has teamed up with Human Rights '95 (www.hr95.org)
for a special holiday offer: For just $25 complete, we will
send a copy of Shattered Lives to your gift recipient, along
with a card saying that this is a holiday gift from you,
with best wishes for a peaceful, just, and free 1999! It
will be sent by priority mail from the HR '95 office in El
Cerrito, California, to make sure they get it in plenty of
time for Christmas or Chanukah.
To order, send a check or money order for $25 (discounts
available on quantities of three or more), to: DRCNet, 2000
P St., NW, Suite 615, Washington, DC 20036, or call us at
(202) 293-8340 or fax to (202) 293-8344 to pay by credit
card, or use our secured online credit card form at
https://www.drcnet.org/cgi-shl/drcreg.cgi -- indicate in the
comments box that you are purchasing a gift, and include the
name and address of the person to whom you wish it to be
sent, and how you would like the card addressed.
Giving the gift of knowledge is invaluable. People truly
need to know what is going on in the name of the Drug War,
and because this book tells personal stories from the front
lines, everyone will find people in it with whom they can
relate or sympathize. Give Shattered Lives to someone who
has no idea just how out of control this Drug War is, or who
as the "lock 'em up and throw away the key" mentality, or
who just doesn't understand why you feel so passionately
about this subject. Give it to someone who's taking risks
without understanding the consequences, or to kids who need
a warning before they start to experiment with drugs. Give
it to a politician who doesn't understand how much harm they
are doing, or to a minister who can use material for a
sermon, or to a teacher who can use it as class material.
Many nonviolent prisoners of the Drug War will be spending
yet another holiday with prison guards rather than their
loved ones. By helping their faces and stories to be known,
you will be giving them a gift of hope this holiday season,
and a chance for justice to prevail.
***
8. EDITORIAL: Human Rights Declared but Not Observed
by Adam J. Smith, DRCNet Associate Director
This past week marked the fiftieth anniversary of the
signing of the United Nations' Declaration on Human Rights.
It is a remarkable document, written in the aftermath of the
Holocaust, which acknowledges a commitment by the nations of
the world to due process, equality, and personal freedom.
Even today, while millions of people still live under
conditions violative of both the letter and the spirit of
the Declaration, it is held out as the marker of advanced
society. It is shocking then, that fifty years after the
world came together in agreement on standards for the
treatment of the individual, the United States, its
constitution the envy of billions of the world's citizens,
pursues a policy which contradicts and offends those
principles.
The drug war, and the ever-escalating effort to enforce its
unenforceable prohibitions, has led America down a path that
few could have imagined fifty years ago, until now we have
come to a time in our history when the unthinkable is
routine, and the unquestionable has been questioned and even
discarded. Whether out of frustration, ignorance or
political ambition, a generation of leaders have sacrificed
the moral high ground in favor of a moralistic oppression so
foreign to the ideals of human rights as to shock the
conscience. A brief look at but a few of the articles of
the Declaration of Human Rights points to a system out of
control, and a nation in a race toward the bottom in its
treatment of its citizens.
Article 10 of the United Nations Declaration states that
"Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public
hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the
determination of his rights and obligations and of any
criminal charge against him." Yet every day in America,
citizens are convicted and sentenced to long prison terms on
the word of informants who are being paid, often in the
currency of their own freedom, for their testimony. And
while it would be illegal for an accused to offer anything
of value in return for testimony on his or her behalf, they
are routinely sent away, their lives destroyed, by people
whose futures depend upon telling the court exactly what the
state wants to hear.
Article 12 states, "No one shall be subjected to arbitrary
interference with his privacy, family, home or
correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and
reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the
law against such interference or attacks." Yet every day in
America, the doors of citizens are kicked in on the word of
confidential informants, police tap phones, sift through
garbage, scan houses with infra-red sensors, stop and search
travelers who fit vague "profiles", force people to urinate
on demand for chemical tests and watch unsuspecting citizens
with surveillance cameras. Privacy and the integrity of
one's home and person have become a casualty of the
unrelenting search for contraband, which can be anywhere and
everywhere.
Article 16.3 states, "The family is the natural and
fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to
protection by society and the state." Yet every day in
America parents are taken from their children for terms of
years or decades for non-violent offenses in which no one,
save arguably the parents themselves have been harmed.
Children are also taken from parents and incarcerated, for
non-violent offenses, often to be housed with adult
prisoners.
Article 17.2 states, "No one shall be arbitrarily deprived
of his property." Yet every day in America, government
agents seize the property of individuals on the merest
suspicion. That property is then presumed to belong to the
state, whether or not criminal charges are filed. Proof is
then required not of the government, but of the rightful
owner, whether or not that individual can afford
representation.
Article 18 states, "Everyone has the right to freedom of
thought, conscience and religion: This right includes
freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom,
either alone or in community with others and in public or
private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching,
practice, worship and observance." Yet across America,
practitioners of Rastafari, Coptic Christians, Sufi Moslems
and others have been denied the right to their traditional
sacraments. They have been told that their religion, and
its commandments, do not meet the criteria of the state and
are therefore illegitimate. Members of these groups are
harassed, surveilled and jailed. When they are released,
the terms of their parole or probation often forbid them to
worship in their chosen manner and even to associate with
others of their faith.
Last week marked fifty years since the world came together
in the aftermath of one of the greatest atrocities in the
history of humankind. Humbled by the sheer powerlessness of
the individual in the face of a state out of control, these
representatives of the peoples of the globe set out the
basic, minimal standards of freedom, equality, and the
dignity of man. Fifty years ago the United States stood as
the paragon of the virtues that they enumerated. Today, in
the name of a war perpetrated upon her own citizens, that
same United States makes a mockery of those ideals. It is
stunning, really, that we have fallen so far, so fast. We
as a nation are not, by virtue of our place in history,
immune from tyranny. Nor, apparently, are we cognizant of
its warning signs.
***
DRCNet needs your support! Donations can be sent to 2000 P
St., NW, Suite 615, Washington, DC 20036, or made by credit
card at http://www.drcnet.org/drcreg.html. Donations to
the Drug Reform Coordination Network are not tax-deductible.
Deductible contributions supporting our educational work can
be made by check to the DRCNet Foundation, a 501(c)(3) tax-
exempt organization, same address.
***
DRCNet
***
GATEWAY TO REFORM PAGE http://www.stopthedrugwar.org/
DRCNet HOME PAGE http://www.drcnet.org/
DRUG POLICY LIBRARY http://www.druglibrary.org/
JOIN/MAKE A DONATION http://www.drcnet.org/drcreg.html
REFORMER'S CALENDAR http://www.drcnet.org/calendar.html
SUBSCRIBE TO THIS LIST http://www.drcnet.org/signup.html
-------------------------------------------------------------------
[End]
[For a court document about the "trap and trace" device at American
Agriculture in Portland, and the attempt by police to keep their illegal
wiretap secret by prosecuting the whistleblower, download the 14-page Adobe
Acrobat .pdf file below. If you do not have Adobe Acrobat Reader, you can
download it for free at the link above. - ed.]
http://www.pdxnorml.org/981211_trap.pdf
(33,247 bytes)
***
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1998 12:50:20 -0600
From: Arthur Sobey (asobey@ncfcomm.com)
To: Phil Smith (pdxnorml@pdxnorml.org)
Subject: Re: some law
Here's the second part of the motion to suppress.
Art
***
http://www.pdxnorml.org/981211_motion.pdf
(9,700 bytes, 5 pages)
to the 1998 Daily News index for Dec. 10-16