Portland NORML News - Friday, December 4, 1998
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Officials still have to iron out the details of how legal marijuana users
will be protected (A slightly different version of yesterday's Associated
Press article about the implementation of the Oregon Medical Marijuana Act,
in the Salem, Oregon, Statesman Journal)

Date: Sat, 05 Dec 1998 01:59:55 -0800
From: Paul Freedom (nepal@teleport.com)
Organization: Oregon Libertarian Patriots
To: Cannabis Patriots (Cannabis-Patriots-L@teleport.com)
Subject: CanPat - Statesman Journal-AP-DRUG LAW LEAVES LOOSE ENDS-
Sender: owner-cannabis-patriots-l@smtp.teleport.com

DRUG LAW LEAVES LOOSE ENDS

Officials still have to iron out the details of how legal marijuana users
will be protected

The Statesman Journal
[Salem, Oregon]
12-4-98
AP

Portland--- With a drag on her glowing pipe, Gail Willock
gave a satisfied stare through her hazy basement. In the 30 years
she's smoked pot for arthritis and glaucoma, it was probably her
first legal toke.

Willock is among the seriously ill Oregonians who breathed a
sigh of relief Thursday as a new medical marijuana law kicked in
that allows them to puff with impunity.

"I don't feel nearly as criminal as I used to," Willock said. "I
don't expect to have any problems with the local police, but I
don't know about the feds."

The 48-year-old woman said marijuana cuts her pain in half
and eliminates the spasmatic nightmares triggered by her years
in Vietnam as a Red Cross volunteer.

Willock welcomed the law passed by voters last month, but
bureaucrats are hustling to iron out such details as permits and
policing policies by May 1, when medical marijuana users will
receive special registration cards.

Until then they are protected under an affirmative defense
provision written into the law. While police still are able to
arrest marijuana users, suspects can dodge a conviction by
having a doctor confirm that the drug could ease their debilitating
illness.

Sufferers of AIDS, cancer and glaucoma qualify as long as they
don't sell the drug or use it in a public place. But the law also exempts
from prosecution people who suffer severe pain nausea, seizures and
muscle spasms.

That's what has police worried.

"The reality of this is anyone charged with a marijuana offense can
raise the affirmative defense," said Molalla police Chief Bob Elkins, who
sits on a task force charged with drawing up a police response to the
new law. "It's open to the potential for abuse."

Even Oregon's attorney general in not sure whom to arrest and how
to proceed. Clouding the issue is the fact that federal law still prohibits
marijuana use.

"There's going to be as many different ways of handling this as there
police departments and district attorneys," Elkins said.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Audit - Review $1 billion expansion of prison system (The Oregonian
says auditors for the state of Oregon are urging a thorough review
of the state's $1 billion prison expansion plan because of concerns
that it could bring a surplus of prison beds at construction costs
that are nearly 70 percent higher than in other states.)

The Oregonian
letters to editor:
letters@news.oregonian.com
1320 SW Broadway
Portland, OR 97201
Fax: 503-294-4193
Web: http://www.oregonlive.com/

Audit: Review $1 billion expansion of prison system

* A state report says Oregon might be adding more prison beds than it will
need while paying almost 70 percent more than other states

Friday, December 4 1998

By Nena Baker
of The Oregonian staff

State auditors are urging a thorough review of Oregon's $1 billion prison
expansion plan because of concerns that it could bring a surplus of prison
beds at construction costs that are nearly 70 percent higher than other states.

A new Audits Division report released Thursday said the state could save $64
million by cutting back on unneeded beds and by adjusting the mix of beds to
better reflect the security risk of the inmate population.

State Corrections Department officials disputed many of the audit's
findings, saying they already had compensated for a projected decline in the
inmate population. Still, the report is expected to reshape the debate about
prison spending when the 1999 Legislature convenes early next year.

The auditors concluded that:

* Oregon is adding too many prison beds. Current plans will result in a
surplus of 426 beds in October 2002, rising to 1,935 in November 2004.
Cutting 400 beds could save $30 million.

* The security mix is out of balance. The report predicts an excess of 2,438
medium- and maximum-security beds, but a shortage of 1,060 minimum-security
beds when the Two Rivers prison is completed in 1999. Adjusting the mix
could save $34 million.

* Construction costs are higher than elsewhere. Oregon's average cost of
$77,649 a bed compares with about $45,977 a bed for 14 states that were
surveyed for the audit. The figures were adjusted to reflect regional
differences in labor, materials and equipment costs.

The auditors, who work in a division under Secretary of State Phil
Keisling's office, called on legislators and Gov. John Kitzhaber to
re-evaluate the Corrections Department's massive building plan, which calls
for adding 11,134 prison beds during the next 10 years.

Construction for 7,154 of those beds has not yet begun, but Kitzhaber has
approved a new women's prison and inmate intake center near Wilsonville and
new minimum- and medium-security prison sites in Lakeview, Junction City,
Madras and White City.

"Any facilities found unjustified should not be constructed," the audit states.

The expansion program was a response to Measure 11, a ballot initiative
voters passed in 1994 that set tough mandatory sentences for many violent
crimes. Original predictions that the measure would bring an explosion in
the inmate population didn't hold up, however.

Auditors said the 10-year prison population estimate has dropped from a high
of 19,592 inmates expected in 2008 to only 14,158 inmates. As of July 1,
there were 8,435 inmates in the state system.

Sen. Kevin Mannix, R-Salem, the author of Measure 11, said Thursday that a
surplus of prison beds isn't necessarily a bad thing. "I'm not going to join
in a chorus of criticism of the Department of Corrections for trying to get
ahead of the curve," he said.

And corrections officials said the audit lacked context, exaggerated the
surplus in beds and made unfair cost comparisons.

"We build prisons here out of concrete and steel that are meant to last 100
years," said Benjamin deHaan, the deputy director of corrections. "You
cannot compare those with prisons built under construction methods that
would not meet Oregon building codes and which the department believes
aren't safe."

DeHaan acknowledged that there are discrepancies between current inmate
population forecasts and the kinds of prison beds now under construction.

"But what wasn't taken into account is the fact that when construction of
medium-security beds took place, it was in accordance with the forecasted
needs at that moment," he said. "If you're already in the middle of building
a certain type of prison, you don't just stop building it."

Two new prisons that are part of the department's long-range plan already
are under construction.

Snake River, a 2,348-bed medium-security prison expansion in Ontario, is
scheduled to be complete this year, at an estimated cost of $179 million. It
is the largest state-financed construction project in Oregon history,
auditors said.

Two Rivers, a 1,536-bed medium-security prison in Umatilla, is scheduled to
be complete in November 1999, at an estimated cost of $149 million.

But construction costs are dwarfed by the cost of operating a prison for any
length of time. According to the federal Bureau of Prisons, the cost to
operate a prison during its useful life is 15 to 20 times its construction
expense.

DeHaan said the department will not automatically staff new prison capacity
if the inmates aren't there.

"It's like a school building," he said. "You build based on what you think
you need, but you don't hire the staff until you need it."

Rep. Jim Welsh, R-Elmira, co-chairman of a legislative committee that
received the audit, said he expects the Legislature to move quickly in
addressing the questions the report raises.

"We've got to be accountable to the taxpayers," he said. "They want
facilities, but they want us to do it reasonably, too."

The audit questioned the department's decision to use more than $20 million
in potential savings and contingency funds for additions to the Snake River
and Two Rivers prisons.

The Snake River project could have been completed for $138 million, which
was $6 million less than the project's projected maximum price, the report
noted.

"They had the option of stopping right there, but they didn't," said
Drummond Kahan, the administrator who managed the audit.

Instead, the department decided to spend $200,000 on a firing range, $35,000
for acoustic sound panels and $43,774 for rubberized flooring in the
gymnasium weight rooms.

The auditors said the Legislature should require the department to justify
spending outside the planned scope of work. And they urged the Corrections
Department to review its construction projects to show they are being
completed for the lowest possible cost, as Oregon law requires.

DeHaan said the department is "open to input from the Audit Division and the
Legislature about cutting costs."

"As we go through the next legislative session, it's very clear that
policies that drive costs need full discussion," he said.

James Mayer of The Oregonian staff contributed to this report.

Nena Baker covers politics for the Public Life Team. She can be reached at
503-221-8378 or by e-mail at nenabaker@news.oregonian.com. Write to her at
The Oregonian, 1320 S.W. Broadway, Portland, Ore. 97201.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

The Dire Consequences Of DARE (Boulder Weekly columnist Wayne Laugesen
says Police Chief Mark Beckner and Boulder County Sheriff George Epp
should be applauded for recently dumping DARE. Laugesen called psychologist
William Hansen, whose research formed the basis for DARE. Hansen said
the LAPD took an anti-drug model he had developed while it was in its infant
stages and ran with it. "DARE was misguided as soon as they adopted
our material, because we were off base," Hansen said. "It's outdated material
that does not work." Dare to have no drug intervention program at all.
The results will be astounding. Fewer children will use drugs, more classroom
time will be spent on legitimate education, and police will be able to focus
on crime.)
Dare to keep cops off kids
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 1998 14:21:36 -0800
From: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org (MAPNews)
To: mapnews@mapinc.org
Subject: MN: US CO: Column: The Dire Consequences Of DARE
Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org
Reply-To: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org
Organization: Media Awareness Project http://www.mapinc.org/lists/
Newshawk: cohip@levellers.org (Colo. Hemp Init. Project)
Pubdate: Fri, 4 Dec 1998
Source: Boulder Weekly (CO)
Contact: bweditor@tesser.com
Website: http://www.boulderweekly.com/
Author: Wayne Laugesen (Wayne@Laugesen.com)

THE DIRE CONSEQUENCES OF DARE

Epp and Beckner are right (and we don't say that often)

Police Chief Mark Beckner and Boulder County Sheriff George Epp recently
dumped the local chapters of DARE, a national mistake known as Drug Abuse
Resistance Education. They should be applauded for their bold actions, which
hopefully will put Boulder at the leading edge of an overnight national
trend.

Publicly, Beckner says he has nothing against DARE, which every year
dispatches police officers to preach against the evils of drug use to 35
million fifth graders nationally. The police chief allows that the program
wasn't meeting the community's needs. Epp criticizes DARE for lacking
flexibility. They're being polite.

The truth: DARE led to an increase in drug abuse among teenagers.

I suspected that in 1996 when the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services issued a report showing a rise in teen drug use of 78 percent
between 1992 and 1995 on the heels of DARE's most prolific years of growth.
Some high profile potheads at Boulder's Sacred Herb Church-where toking
joints once served as communion-also felt strongly that DARE was leading
children to drugs. And who would know better, I thought.

Shortly after the HHS report broke, I conducted some research, which
involved contacting the people who know DARE best-its founders.

I called psychologist William Hansen, whose research formed the basis for
DARE. Hansen was a professor of psychology at the University of Southern
California when DARE was started in 1983 by then-Los Angeles Police Chief
Darryl Gates, whose son was addicted to drugs. Hansen said the LAPD took an
anti-drug model he had developed while it was in its infant stages and ran
with it. More than a decade later, Hansen observed, DARE was still using the
exact same model, even though he himself had scrapped it as one of many
unsuccessful attempts to develop a workable anti-drug program for schools.
"DARE was misguided as soon as they adopted our material, because we were
off base," Hansen told me. "It's outdated material that does not work."

I called Bill Colson, the world-renowned psychologist who co-authored 17
books with the late Carl Rogers, former president of the American
Psychological Association. In the '60s and '70s, Colson and Rogers, along
with renowned psychologist Abraham Maslow, developed and popularized
psychological practices known as "experimental education," "humanistic
psychology," and "self-actualization." Their theories formed the foundation
for Hansen's research.

Like Hansen, Colson, Rogers and Maslow all eventually said "oops," regarding
the theories DARE was founded upon.

"DARE is rooted in trash psychology," Colson told me two years ago. "We
developed the theories that DARE was founded on, and we were wrong. Even Abe
Maslow wrote about these theories being wrong before he died."

Which is true, said Boulder psychotherapist Ellen Maslow, Abraham Maslow's
daughter. She called DARE "nonsense" in 1996, saying the program represented
widespread misinterpretation of humanistic psychology.

Ellen Maslow said her father's vision of humanistic psychology was
misunderstood by public educators, who bent and twisted it and ended up
making childhood "self-esteem" a central focus of public education.
Self-esteem is a central focus in DARE, and Ellen Maslow says it has led to
narcissism and self-indulgence.

Other critics of self-esteem are easy to find these days. "Saddam Hussein
and Stalin had great self-esteem," Norm Resnick, a psychologist and national
radio talk show host told me. "Children need authoritative guidance.
Self-esteem alone doesn't translate into making good decisions." Still not
convinced DARE was all bad, I contacted psychologist Richard H. Blum at
Stanford University School of Medicine. At the time, Blum was heading the
single largest ongoing study of drug education in the United States,
published as "Drug Education: Results and Recommendations.

"Basically, we have found again and again that drug education in schools
causes kids to take on drugs and alcohol sooner than they would without the
education," Blum told me.

Colson summed it up best. "As they get a little older, they become very
curious about these drugs they've learned about from police officers. The
kids start thinking, 'I don't want to say no.' Then they say, 'Didn't that
police officer tell me it's my perfect right to choose?' And thus, they
choose to experiment."

By now police departments must know this. But DARE is first and foremost
about money. According to Hansen, taxpayers spend about $125 per DARE pupil.
"What this does is channel a lot of money to police departments, and that's
why they like it," Hansen says.

Responding to Boulder's abandonment of the program, DARE spokesman Ralph
Lockridge had the gall to suggest we need more of it. The program should be
broadened to include high school students, not just fifth graders, he
claims.

"It's sort of like teaching someone 17 piano lessons in the fifth grade and
expecting them to remember anything without any reinforcement when you test
them in high school," Lockridge told the Sunday Camera.

This man obviously suffers from excessive self-esteem disorder.

In truth, DARE's expectation is far sillier than Lockridge's piano analogy
suggests. He'd be accurate to say: "It's like teaching students 17 piano
lessons in the fifth grade and then expecting them to never touch a
keyboard."

Despite their public politeness, I suspect Sheriff Epp and Chief Beckner
have figured all this out and no longer wish to sponsor a program that
spawns young drug addicts.

Unfortunately, both men have suggested some other program might replace
DARE. They should think about the lack of success world-renowned
psychologists have had in finding a way to introduce the subject of drugs
without it backfiring.

In school, students are supposed to learn. Teach them math, they'll use
math. Teach them reading, they will read. Teach them about drugs, they will
toke up.

We ought to celebrate the local dumping of DARE. Then take the opportunity
to urge the school district and local law enforcement to reject drug
education in schools. Let individual guardians of children figure out the
complex issue of adolescent drug abuse on an individual basis.

Here's a proposition for the Boulder Police Department, Sheriff Epp and the
Boulder Valley School District: Dare to have no drug intervention program at
all. Let's call it DIRE-Drug Intervention Resistance Endeavor. The goal will
be zero tolerance for drug education in public schools.

The results will be astounding. Fewer children will use drugs, more
classroom time will be spent on legitimate education, and police will be
able to focus on crime.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Drug Crusade Has Produced Everything But Success
(An op-ed in the Fort Worth, Texas, Star-Telegram comes out
against the war on some drug users. Among other things,
the war has led to a 20 percent increase in substance addiction.)

Date: Sat, 5 Dec 1998 23:22:39 -0800
From: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org (MAPNews)
To: mapnews@mapinc.org
Subject: MN: US TX: OPED: Drug Crusade Has Produced Everything But Success
Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org
Reply-To: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org
Organization: Media Awareness Project http://www.mapinc.org/lists/
Newshawk: adbryan@onramp.net
Pubdate: Fri, 4 Dec 1998
Source: Ft. Worth Star-Telegram (TX)
Contact: letters@star-telegram.com
Website: http://www.star-telegram.com/
Copyright: 1998 Star-Telegram, Fort Worth, Texas
Author: Don Erler

DRUG CRUSADE HAS PRODUCED EVERYTHING BUT SUCCESS

If bloody turf wars, official corruption and unconstitutional searches and
seizures are blessings, we can thank the war on drugs for our good fortune.
This latest incarnation of Prohibition has led to a 20 percent increase in
substance addiction and a maximum 5 percent reduction of supply.

The crusade has produced other marvels:

* A million arrests per year for drug offenses.

* A prison population that exploded from 200,000 in 1966 to 2 million in 1996.

* The incarceration or supervision of one in four African-American men.
Although most drug users are white, blacks are 500 percent more likely to
be arrested.

* Drug forfeitures (with little, certainly not "due," process of law) that
have permitted some small-town police departments to increase their budgets
fivefold.

Molly Ivins provided this last piece of information in her Aug. 20 column.
The rest -- and most of what follows -- is found in Mike Gray's recent
book, `Drug Crazy.'

The war is unwinnable. In Los Angeles this month, some 130,000 steel
containers will be unloaded from cargo ships. Our customs agents will
inspect 400.

The entire annual consumption of cocaine for this country can fit in 13
containers, heroin in one.

Prohibition drives prices to levels so dizzyingly high that bribery --
especially in poor Latin American countries -- is nearly impossible to
deter. Coca leaves that cost $150 generate $15,000 in cocaine on Fort Worth
streets. And heroin is three times more profitable.

The Swiss properly voted Sunday against legalization of hard drugs. But the
movement toward more sensible marijuana policies is gaining momentum. Two
decades ago, a dozen states decided to reduce punishment for marijuana
possession, with no substantial increase in use. Last month, five states
joined California by passing measures permitting medical use of marijuana.

This "soft" drug is the key to more effective policies. As Gray notes,
"Take the reefer out of the equation and the number of illegal drug users
instantly drops from 13 million to 3 million." Some 70 million Americans
have tried the drug, 98 percent of whom graduated to nothing more
intoxicating than gin.

Gray points to several examples of approaches more successful than ours.
Dutch "hash houses" have been tightly controlled. The government allows no
hard drugs, advertising or sales to children. Hard drugs are illegal but
generally tolerated by police, who ignore small amounts of heroin or
cocaine for personal use. But they are tough on drug dealers.

The Chapel Street Clinic near Liverpool, England -- finally, after pressure
from the United States, shut down in 1995 -- featured a heroin maintenance
program. Dr. John Marks took over the facility in 1982 and discovered no
AIDS virus in his needle-users; no drug-related deaths; most patients with
jobs and good health; and substantial reduction in crime among addicts.

The Swiss conducted the first large-scale experiment in prescribing drugs
to serious addicts. Eight hundred volunteers were tracked for three years.
In the final report issued in July 1997, Gray says, "Crime among the addict
population dropped by 60 percent, half the unemployed found jobs, a third
of those on welfare became self-supporting, nobody was homeless . . . . By
the end of the experiment, 83 patients had decided on their own to give up
heroin in favor of abstinence."

Ethan Nadelmann heads the Lindesmith Center, a think tank devoted to this
issue. His simple credo is harm reduction. Make marijuana available to
adults under tight controls. Then institute drug maintenance for the
incorrigible. At all costs, do not allow -- as our current policy of
prohibition encourages -- gangsters to control the market.

If we control drugs and treat addiction as a medical problem, most of the
evils attending prohibition can be diminished.

Don Erler of Hurst is president of General Building Maintenance in Fort Worth.

You can write him at 3201 Airport Freeway, Suite 108, Bedford, TX 76021.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

DARE Officer's Wife Arrested For Drugs Possession
(The Chicago Sun-Times says the Chicago's cop's wife was charged
with possession of crack cocaine and marijuana.)

Date: Fri, 4 Dec 1998 10:16:40 -0800
From: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org (MAPNews)
To: mapnews@mapinc.org
Subject: MN: US IL: D.A.R.E. Officers Wife Arrested For Drugs Possession
Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org
Reply-To: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org
Organization: Media Awareness Project http://www.mapinc.org/lists/
Newshawk: Judy Hall (Scully_46394@Yahoo.com)
Pubdate: Fri, 4 Dec 1998
Source: Chicago Sun-times (Il)
Contact: Letters@Suntimes.com
Website: Http://Www.suntimes.com/Index/
Copyright: 1998 The Sun-times Co.
Author: Michael Sneed, Chicago Sun Times

D.A.R.E. OFFICERS WIFE ARRESTED FOR DRUGS POSSESSION

Police Blotter.....

It's A Shocker. Sneed Hears The Wife Of A Chicago DARE Police Officer,
Who Teaches Kids How To Stay Off Drugs, Was Arrested On Nov. 21 In An
Apartment At Cabrini-green And Charged With Possession Of Crack
Cocaine And Marijuana And The Unlawful Storage Of A Of A Loaded Rifle.
Even Though The Cop's Wife Lives Elsewhere With Her Husband, The
Apartment Lease At Cabrini-green Is Listed In Her Name.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Our Prisons Have Bigger Problems Than Escapees
(Syndicated Fort Worth Star-Telegram columnist Molly Ivins
discusses "The Prison-Industrial Complex," in the current issue
of The Atlantic Monthly, an article revealing the out-of-control
and increasingly corrupt American political, judicial
and correctional system.)

Date: Sat, 5 Dec 1998 16:27:23 -0800
From: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org (MAPNews)
To: mapnews@mapinc.org
Subject: MN: US TX: Column: Our Prisons Have Bigger Problems
Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org
Reply-To: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org
Organization: Media Awareness Project http://www.mapinc.org/lists/
Newshawk: adbryan@onramp.net
Pubdate: Fri, 4 Dec 1998
Source: Ft. Worth Star-Telegram (TX)
Contact: letters@star-telegram.com
Website: http://www.star-telegram.com/
Copyright: 1998 Star-Telegram, Fort Worth, Texas
Columnist: Molly Ivins is a columnist for the 'Star-Telegram.'
Email: mollyivins@star-telegram.com

OUR PRISONS HAVE BIGGER PROBLEMS THAN ESCAPEES

AUSTIN -- So six prisoners break out of Huntsville, one gets away and the
Texas Department of Corrections responds by suspending a work program for
prisoners. Not that the work program had anything to do with the escape --
the prisoners were in the recreation yard at the time. But why should we
expect TDC to make any sense? Nothing else about the American prison system
does.

In the current issue of `The Atlantic Monthly' is "The Prison-Industrial
Complex," a major investigation of just how out of control and increasingly
corrupt the system is. But in order to understand the mistakes we're making
in responding to the cry for more prisons, you first have to understand why
we think we need them.

Eric Schlosser reports:

"The prison boom in the United States is a recent phenomenon. Throughout
the first three-quarters of this century the nation's incarceration rate
remained relatively stable, at about 110 prison inmates for every 100,000
people. In the mid-1970's the rate began to climb, doubling in the 1980's
and then again in the 1990's. The rate is now 445 per 100,000: among adult
men it is 1,100 per 100,000. During the past two decades roughly a thousand
new prisons and jails have been built in the United States. Nevertheless,
America's prisons are more overcrowded now than when the building spree
began, and the inmate population continues to increase by 50,000 to 80,000
a year."

Among Schlosser's other findings:

* The proportion of offenders being sent to prison each year for violent
crimes has actually fallen during the prison boom. In 1980, about half the
people entering state prison were violent offenders; in 1995, less than a
third had been convicted of violent crime.

* The enormous increase in America's inmate populations is the direct
consequence of the sentences given to nonviolent offenders -- mostly drug
offenders. Crimes that in other countries would lead to community service,
fines or drug treatment (or would not be crimes at all) are punished here
with increasingly long prison terms, the most expensive of all possible
options.

* Since 1991, the rate of violent crime in the United States has fallen by
about 20 percent, while the number of people in prison or jail has risen by
50 percent. This leads to a perfectly circular argument by those in the
prison-industrial complex: If crime is going up, we need to build more
prisons; if crime is going down, it's because we built more prisons -- and
building even more of them will drive the crime rate even lower. (For those
of you who missed Sociology I, the crime rate has dropped because the
crime-committing cohort -- those aged 15 to 24 -- is smaller;
unfortunately, it's about to go up again, and so will the crime rate.)

* About 70 percent of prison inmates are illiterate. About 200,000 of the 2
million incarcerated are seriously mentally ill. Sixty to 80 percent of
prisoners have a long history of substance abuse. The number of drug
treatment slots available in U.S. prisons has declined by more than one
half since 1993. Drug treatment is now available to just one in 10 inmates
who needs it.

* Among those arrested for violent crimes, the proportion of African-
Americans has changed little during the past 20 years; among those arrested
for drug crimes, the proportion who are African-American has tripled.

* The number of women sentenced to prison has increased 12 times since
1970; of the 80,000 women now in prison, about 70 percent are nonviolent
offenders. About 75 percent have children.

Schlosser's crucial findings are that the prison-industrial complex is a
set of bureaucratic, political and economic interests that encourage
increased spending on prisons, regardless of actual need. "It is not a
conspiracy, it is a confluence of special interests . . . politicians, both
liberal and conservative, who have used fear of crime to gain votes;
impoverished rural areas where prisons have become a cornerstone of
economic development; private companies that regard the roughly $35 billion
spent each year on corrections not as a burden on American taxpayers but as
a lucrative market; and government officials whose fiefdoms have expanded
along with the inmate population. . . . The prison-industrial complex
includes some of the nation's largest architectural and construction firms,
Wall Street investment banks and companies that sell everything from
security cameras to padded cells available in a `vast color selection.' "

Perhaps the most alarming conclusion is that the prison-industrial complex
is not just a set of interest groups and institutions. "It is also a state
of mind. The lure of big money is corrupting the nation's criminal-justice
system, replacing notions of public service with a drive for higher
profits. The eagerness of elected officials to pass `tough-on-crime'
legislation -- combined with their unwillingness to disclose the true costs
of these laws -- has encouraged all kinds of financial improprieties."

And naturally, Texas is cited as a prime example.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

DuPage Prosecutors File Lawsuit To Stop So-Called 'Head Shops'
(The Daily Herald, in Illinois, says DuPage County prosecutors filed suit
Thursday, claiming two alleged "head shops," as prosecutors called them,
in Downers Grove and Westmont are selling drug paraphernalia.)

Date: Sat, 5 Dec 1998 23:22:28 -0800
From: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org (MAPNews)
To: mapnews@mapinc.org
Subject: MN: US IL: DuPage Prosecutors File Lawsuit To Stop So-Called 'Head
Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org
Reply-To: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org
Organization: Media Awareness Project http://www.mapinc.org/lists/
Newshawk: Steve Young
Pubdate: 4 Dec. 1998
Source: Daily Herald (IL)
Section: Sec. 1
Contact: fencepost@dailyherald.com
Website: http://www.dailyherald.com
Copyright: 1998 The Daily Herald Company
Author: Robert McCoppin

DUPAGE PROSECUTORS FILE LAWSUIT TO STOP SO-CALLED 'HEAD SHOPS'

DuPage County prosecutors filed suit Thursday, claiming two alleged "head
shops" are selling drug paraphernalia.

The owners of the shops, in Downers Grove and Westmont, objected that
authorities are trying to infringe on their rights and their customers'
freedom.

On Nov. 12, police raided Sight & Sound at 663 N. Cass Ave. in Westmont,
and All American Sports Cards & Comics, also known as Alternative Universe,
at 4941 Main St., Downers Grove.

The suits seek a permanent injunction to stop the "head shops," as
prosecutors called them, from selling items often associated with marijuana
smoking such as water pipes, air masks, bongs, dugouts and one-hitters.

State's Attorney Joseph Birkett said his office acted on complaints from
the community.

"We don't sell drug paraphernalia," Sight & Sound owner Joseph Salamie
said. "We sell totally legal products, all for tobacco use and for (legal)
herbs."

Prosecutors said the All American Card Shop is violating a court order from
last year banning drug-smoking devices.

Elizabeth Wiechern, the card shop owner, said her products are used by
people smoking legal herbal blends, which need water pipes to cool their
harshness.

She said she does not use or advocate marijuana, and denied prosecutors'
accusations that she is promoting drug use to teenagers, noting that pipes
and rolling paper are available everywhere.

"If somebody wants to smoke pot," she said, "they can smoke it out of
anything in the world."
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Supreme Court Hears Arguments In Case About Drinking Pregnant Woman
(The Associated Press covers oral arguments before the Wisconsin
Supreme Court Thursday in the challenge to a new law
passed by the legislature allowing a woman to be imprisoned
if police determine that her alcohol or "drug" habit endangers her fetus.)

Date: Wed, 9 Dec 1998 07:55:12 -0800
From: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org (MAPNews)
To: mapnews@mapinc.org
Subject: MN: US: Supreme Court Hears Arguments In Case
About Drinking Pregnant Woman
Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org
Reply-To: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org
Organization: Media Awareness Project http://www.mapinc.org/lists/
Newshawk: Kendra Wright
Pubdate: 4 Dec 1998
Source: Associated Press
Copyright: 1998 Associated Press.
Author: Andrew Blasko, Associated Press Writer

SUPREME COURT HEARS ARGUMENTS IN CASE ABOUT DRINKING PREGNANT WOMAN

MADISON, Wis. - Allowing authorities to prosecute a woman who drank while
she was pregnant could lead to tougher laws controlling what people do with
their bodies, a lawyer told the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

There are no laws against pregnant women smoking, which might be more
harmful to fetuses than alcohol, said Priscilla Smith, a lawyer for the
woman.

"We can harm ourselves. It is one of the freedoms, albeit good or bad, that
we have," Smith told the court Thursday.

A prosecutor argued the woman should be tried as a criminal because she
tried to end her pregnancy by drinking the fetus to death.

The woman, Deborah Zimmerman, was at a tavern the day she gave birth to her
daughter March 16, 1996, Racine County prosecutor Joan Korb said.

Zimmerman remarked later in a hospital she drank to "kill this thing," Korb
said.

"There was a substantial probability that this child would have died as a
result of the alcohol," Korb said.

Zimmerman, 37, of Franksville was charged with attempted first-degree
intentional homicide and first-degree reckless injury after her daughter
was born with a 0.199 percent blood-alcohol level.

The mother's blood-alcohol level exceeded 0.30 percent at the time. A level
of 0.10 percent is considered evidence of intoxication under Wisconsin law.

The case is the second before the court that involves drug or alcohol abuse
during pregnancy. The court ruled last year that a Waukesha County woman
could not be taken into custody to protect her fetus after her doctor
reported she was using cocaine.

That case prompted the Legislature to pass a law allowing a woman to be
detained if authorities determine that her alcohol or drug habit endangers
her fetus.

The court's ruling in the case presented Thursday could determine what a
pregnant woman in Wisconsin can legally do with her body, whether she
smokes, drinks or even drives, said Peter Koneazny, legal director of the
state chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union.

"Women should pay close attention because the implications of having the
state take control of all dangerous behavior for pregnant women has no
logical limits," Koneazny said.

Zimmerman wanted the charges dropped. She challenged a Circuit Court's
refusal in Racine to dismiss them. An appeals court passed the case on to
the Supreme Court.

She sought to end the pregnancy because she had worries over the baby's
race and the pain of childbirth, prosecutors said.

At the hospital, Zimmerman told a nurse that if she wasn't kept there, "I'm
just going to go home and keep drinking and drink myself to death and I'm
going to kill this thing because I don't want it anyways," court records
said.

The girl, now 2 and in foster care, had a low birthweight and mild physical
abnormalities that doctors attribute to her mother's drinking, prosecutors
said.

Zimmerman remains in Taycheedah women's prison in Fond du Lac for bail
jumping.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Angela Davis' new crusade (Boston Globe columnist Derrick Z. Jackson
says the tenured professor who was once placed on the FBI's
Ten Most Wanted List on false charges and jailed for 16 months
before being acquitted, is calling for the abolition of prisons. For every
black male eliminated from California universities in the 1990s, the state
added 57 to its prisons. Prison has become less an institution for hardened
criminals and more of an instrument of social control for low-income people.)
Link to earlier story
From: adbryan@onramp.net Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 08:44:46 -0600 (CST) Subject: Angela Y. Davis - Justice Pioneer To: "DRCTalk Reformers' Forum" (drctalk@drcnet.org) Reply-To: drctalk@drcnet.org Sender: owner-drctalk@drcnet.org This was posted on the C-JUST list. It is a Boston Globe article that ran earlier this month. I was wondering when someone was going to make the prison/slavery connection. The article contains come good stats relating to prison growth and education shrinking. ---- Begin Included Message ---- Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1998 12:54:36 -0500 Reply-To: "CJUST-L: Criminal Justice Discussion List" (CJUST-L@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU) Sender: "CJUST-L: Criminal Justice Discussion List" (CJUST-L@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU) From: "John V. Wilmerding" (jvw@TOGETHER.NET) Subject: Angela Y. Davis - Justice Pioneer To: CJUST-L@CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU Angela Davis' new crusade By Derrick Z. Jackson, Globe Columnist, 12/04/98 PALO ALTO, Calif. -- In the 1960s when she thrust her fist skyward against oppression with the firmness of steel and issued critiques of America as volcanic as her Afro, Angela Davis had a tremendous optimism that prisons would become rusted hulks in an America that educated its children. "When there were only 200,000 people in prison in the country, California had the best public educational system in the country from kindergarden all the way up through postgraduate," Davis said in a recent interview with the Trotter Group, a national group of African-American columnists. "And in a lot of ways, you could say people who wanted to get an education could. In 1968, we had the strike at San Francisco State, University of California-Berkeley. You had the beginning of open admissions. We had an amazing amount of hope for the educational system." Her hope has been shattered. The national prison population has zoomed from 200,000 toward 2 million. African-American and Latino men now find admission to jail far easier than college. A Rockefeller-funded study released this fall by the Justice Policy Institute found that there are now five times more African-American men in California prisons than in state universities - 44,617 to 8,767. There are 53,881 Latino prisoners compared with 30,454 in four-year state colleges. The gulf is now so wide that Davis is on a new crusade. She is calling for the abolition of prisons. "Oftentimes people think I'm really a provocateur when I talk about prison abolition," Davis said. "But there were those who felt the same way about the abolition of slavery. There were those who assumed that slavery was here to stay, that it was eternal. If you don't have those who are willing to try to imagine a world where the prison doesn't loom so large as it does today, then we'll never get there. "Most of us can't imagine that. Most of us can't imagine living in a society without prisons." Davis's ability to imagine such a thing during this punishment-mad, prison-happy era comes from her own perseverance. She was once labeled so radical in California that Ronald Reagan, then governor, vowed that Davis would never again teach in a state university after UCLA dropped her from the philosophy department in 1969. A member of the Communist Party, she was put on the FBI's Ten Most Wanted List on false charges and jailed for 16 months before being acquitted. She now is a tenured professor at University of California-Santa Cruz. She has published six books. When she helped organize a national conference on prisons in the Bay Area in September, she thought that perhaps 500 people would attend. More than 3,000 came. The attendance, Davis said, was a sign that people are recognizing that prison has become less an institution for truly hardened criminals and more of an instrument of social control of low-income people whom society has decided not to educate. In the last 10 years, spending on corrections in California has grown 60 percent, while spending on kindergarten through 12th grade went up only 26 percent and higher education declined 3 percent. Though it costs five times more to incarcerate someone in California than to educate them in college ($22,000 to $4,000), California has built 21 new prisons since 1980, and only one new college campus. The top pay for correctional officers - $50,820 a year - easily surpasses the average salary range of $32,000 to $37,000 for university instructors. Underfunded state colleges in turn unload their burdens on the backs of students, raising tuitions by as much as 485 percent since 1980. For African-American men, the tuitions are a modern poll tax. Between 1990 and 1997, African-American male enrollment in state public universities declined by 217 students while the number of black male prisoners increased by 12,147. Thus, for every black male eliminated from its state universities in the 1990s, California has added 57 to its prisons. Many of the new inmates are nonviolent offenders who could be more effectively rehabilitated with drug treatment and education. "We've always known that the war on drugs is really a war on the communities that so often are victimized by the drug trade." Davis said. "Which isn't to say that people don't have responsibility or shouldn't be accountable. But if we don't change things, we'll say perhaps 10 years from now that a black man in California is 10 times more likely to go to prison than to go to college or university. "It seems to me that with all this discussion about slavery, we ought to bring up the discussions about the vestiges of slavery within the prison system and the fact that it is becoming a system that is increasingly designed to hold black people - black men, black women - behind bars, sometimes for the rest of their lives." Derrick Z. Jackson is a Globe columnist. This story ran on page A31 of the Boston Globe on 12/04/98. Copyright 1998 Globe Newspaper Company. *** From the BRC-ALL list: Black Radical Congress, International Discussions *** Subscribe: Email "subscribe brc-all" to majordomo@igc.org *** To subscribe to the CERJ E-Mail distribution list, simply send an E-mail message to cerj@cerj.org. Please include your name and your state, province, or country of residence. Thank you! *** John Wilmerding, Gen'l Secretary | E-Mail: (info@cerj.org) Web: http://www.cerj.org CERJ International Secretariat | ICQ Number: 18723495 Campaign for Equity-Restorative Justice 217 High Street Brattleboro, VT 05301-3018 USA Telephone & FAX [802] 254-2826 For Justice That Restores Equity Work together to reinvent justice using methods that are fair; which conserve, restore and even create harmony, equity and good will in society *** We are the prisoners of the prisoners we have taken - J. Clegg *** IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT! CJUST-L is changing servers. For full details, visit: http://members.xoom.com/ahrjj/cjust-l.html *** Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1998 21:04:01 -0500 To: "DRCTalk Reformers' Forum" (drctalk@drcnet.org) From: Paul Wolf (paulwolf@icdc.com) Subject: re: Angela Davis In case anyone has never heard of Angela Davis, she was a Black Panther and a COINTELPRO target. Those are legendary credentials these days. When she was captured by the FBI on false charges of conspiracy to commit murder (after a shootout between Panthers and the LAPD when she was in another city) Richard Nixon went on national TV to congradulate J Edgar Hoover for apprehending her, calling her a terrorist. She was jailed for a year w/o bond before trial, then a jury acquited her of all charges. It was a false arrest to keep her off the street because she was such a popular leader. Now she's saying the war on drugs has always been a war on the people. What a great ally!
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Government Ignores Teenage Alcohol Use (A letter to the editor
of The Daily Star, in Oneonta, New York, notes the Partnership
for a Drug-Free America and the White House drug czar's office
focus their advertising dollars on marijuana, which never killed anyone.
Meanwhile, they ignore the harm to young people attributable to ignorance
about alcohol. For example, Michigan State University student Bradley McCue
recently died on his 21st birthday from acute alcohol poisoning,
after drinking 24 shots of liquor in less than two hours.)

Date: Sun, 6 Dec 1998 18:21:38 -0800
From: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org (MAPNews)
To: mapnews@mapinc.org
Subject: MN: US NY: PUB LTE: Government Ignores Teenage Alcohol Use
Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org
Reply-To: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org
Organization: Media Awareness Project http://www.mapinc.org/lists/
Newshawk: Anonymous
Pubdate: Fri, 04 Dec 1998
Source: The Daily Star (Oneonta, NY)
Contact: medition@theDailyStar.com
Fax: 607-432-5847
Website: http://www.thedailystar.com/

GOVERNMENT IGNORES TEENAGE ALCOHOL USE

Recently, Michigan State University student Bradley McCue, who was
celebrating his 21st birthday, died from acute alcohol poisoning after
drinking 24 shots of liquor in less than two hours.

Bradley McCue may have been poisoned by alcohol, but it was ignorance that
killed him.

Drug Czar Barry McCaffrey acknowledges that "alcohol is ,,, responsible for
more damage in our society than any other drug on the street," But, the
Office of National Drug Control Policy prefers to demonize adult marijuana
use, while ignoring teenage boozers.

Junior and senior high school students drink 35 percent of all wine coolers
sold in the U.S.; they also consume 1.1 billion cans of beer. 87 percent of
high school seniors have used alcohol; in comparison, 63 percent have
smoked cigarettes; 32 percent have used marijuana, and only 6 percent have
used cocaine. Alcohol-related motor vehicle accidents are the leading
cause of death and disability among American teenagers.

The Partnership for a Drug Free America is well aware that alcohol is the
most widely tried drug among teenagers, but their numerous anti-drug
advertisements are fixated on marijuana.

In 1998 Congress gave the ONDCP and the Partnership for a Drug Free America
$195 million to run a new national anti-drug media campaign -- a campaign
that conspicuously avoids mentioning alcohol. In 1998 Bradley McCue died
from an over dose of alcohol because he didn't know it was a dangerous
drug. Ignorance kills. And so do political agendas.

Walter F. Wouk
Howes Cave
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Jail Officials Indicted (UPI says a major drug ring operating within two
Miami-Dade County jails in Florida has been busted with the indictments
and arrests of 26 people, including nine corrections officers and a jail
counselor. The FBI says that in addition to smuggling "drugs," inmates,
officers and others were charged with illegally bringing in cigarettes,
worth $175 a carton.)
Link to earlier story
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 1998 23:22:28 -0800 From: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org (MAPNews) To: mapnews@mapinc.org Subject: MN: US FL: Wire: Jail Officials Indicted Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Reply-To: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Organization: Media Awareness Project http://www.mapinc.org/lists/ Newshawk: General Pulaski Pubdate: Fri, 04 Dec 1998 Source: United Press International Copyright: 1998 United Press International JAIL OFFICIALS INDICTED MIAMI, Fla., Dec. 4 (UPI) - A major drug ring operating within two Miami- Dade County jails has been busted with the indictments and arrests of 26 people, including nine corrections officers and a jail counselor. The FBI says that in addition to smuggling drugs, inmates, officers and others were charged with illegally bringing in cigarettes, food and even exercise equipment. Cigarettes were selling for $175 a carton because they are used as currency in the facility. Those indicted included Euardo Manzano, who the FBI says is the head of the elaborate operation. Most of the suspects were charged with smuggling cocaine and marijuana into the Turner Guilford Knight Correctional Facility for Manzano both for his personal use and for distribution to other inmates. They say corrections officials also smuggled cellular telephones into the jail, moved Manzano to cellblocks were corrections officers would overlook his activities, allowed him to use office telephones and provided him with sensitive information.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

43 people charged in drug network run from behind bars (The Associated Press
version says those charged in connection with smuggling illegal drugs
in Miami-Dade County jails included 13 corrections officers - and the
smuggling ring was run by a jailed dealer.)

From: "Bob Owen@W.H.E.N." (when@olywa.net)
To: "_Drug Policy --" (when@hemp.net)
Subject: 43 FL people charged in drug network run from behind bars
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 1998 20:20:26 -0800
Sender: owner-when@hemp.net

43 people charged in drug network run from behind bars

By RACHEL LA CORTE
The Associated Press
12/04/98 9:18 PM Eastern

MIAMI (AP) -- Forty-three people -- including 13 corrections officers --
were charged with operating an intricate drug-dealing network led by a
jailed dealer after a probe of Miami-Dade County jails turned up rampant
corruption.

The charges follow a secret investigation launched a year ago involving
local, state and federal agencies. The probe found that officers allegedly
looked the other way -- or actively took part -- as marijuana, cocaine and
other contraband was smuggled into jails for inmates in exchange for cash,
jewelry, car repairs, sporting equipment, and more.

The probe focused on the Miami-Dade Pretrial Detention Center and the
Turner-Guilford Knight Correctional Center, a 1,000-bed pretrial facility,
said state attorney Kathy Fernandez Rundle. "It's very disturbing to know
that law enforcement officers are involved in this," Rundle said.

The U.S. attorney's office unsealed an indictment Friday charging 26 people,
including Eduardo Manzano -- the alleged leader of a jailhouse cocaine and
marijuana distribution organization. Manzano made payments to corrections
officers at the detention center and at the correctional center to gain
access to phones, drugs, food and clothing, the indictment said.

The state attorney's office arrested and charged 17 more people, who will be
indicted during the next few weeks, said spokesman Don Ungurait.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Probation For Former Mayor (UPI says Todd Deratany, the former mayor
of Indialantic, Florida, and the son of former state legislator Tim Deratany,
has been sentenced to two years of probation after pleading no contest
to a charge of attempting to sell cocaine.)

Date: Fri, 4 Dec 1998 16:21:33 -0800
From: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org (MAPNews)
To: mapnews@mapinc.org
Subject: MN: US FL: Probation For Former Mayor
Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org
Reply-To: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org
Organization: Media Awareness Project http://www.mapinc.org/lists/
Newshawk: General Pulaski
Pubdate: Fri, 04 Dec 1998
Source: United Press International
Copyright: 1998 United Press International

PROBATION FOR FORMER MAYOR

VIERA, Fla., The former mayor of Indialantic has been sentenced to two
years of probation after pleading no contest to a charge of attempting to
sell cocaine.

32-year-old Todd Deratany, the son of former state legislator Tim Deratany,
resigned from office in April, one day after he was arrested.

Authorities say Todd Deratany loaned his Jeep to a female friend, knowing
she would use the vehicle to complete a drug transaction.

Deratany is a private attorney, but says he will work as a cab driver now
that the Florida Bar has suspended him pending the outcome of an
investigation of his actions.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Nonprofit Cleared for DC Needle Exchange (The Washington Post
says that six weeks after Congress ordered the District of Columbia
to stop paying for a needle exchange program to reduce the spread of HIV
and AIDS among drug users, the city's top lawyer yesterday cleared the way
for the exchange to be taken over by Prevention Works, an independent
nonprofit group that was spun off by the Whitman-Walker Clinic
so as not to endanger its substantial city and federal grants.)

Date: Sat, 5 Dec 1998 17:04:15 -0800
From: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org (MAPNews)
To: mapnews@mapinc.org
Subject: MN: US DC: WP: Nonprofit Cleared for D.C. Needle Exchange
Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org
Reply-To: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org
Organization: Media Awareness Project http://www.mapinc.org/lists/
Newshawk: Kendra Wright http://FamilyWatch.org/
Pubdate: Fri, 04 Dec 1998
Source: Washington Post (DC)
Page: A22
Contact: http://washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/edit/letters/letterform.htm
Website: http://www.washingtonpost.com/
Copyright: 1998 The Washington Post Company
Author: Avram Goldstein, Washington Post Staff Writer

NONPROFIT CLEARED FOR D.C. NEEDLE EXCHANGE

Six weeks after Congress ordered the District to stop paying for a needle
exchange program designed to reduce the spread of HIV and AIDS among drug
users, the city's top lawyer yesterday cleared the way for a private group
to take over the project.

Prevention Works, an independent nonprofit group that was spun off by the
Whitman-Walker Clinic so as not to endanger its substantial city and
federal grants, plans to resume distributing clean needles as early as
today or Monday. It relies solely on private funding.

Before the controversy erupted, the Whitman-Walker program was handing out
17,000 needles a month to drug users at regular locations throughout the city.

In a letter, D.C. Corporation Counsel John M. Ferren advised Health
Department interim director Marlene N. Kelley that she could authorize
Prevention Works to go forward without running afoul of the wishes of
Congress.

Within hours, D.C. AIDS administration officials certified Prevention Works
to go forward, and last night the group's new board of directors was
meeting to organize itself and put the exchange back in operation.

"We're very pleased," said Patricia Hawkins, associate executive director
of Whitman-Walker. "It's been very difficult to know that people need these
needles and they haven't been available."

A crew of four will again cruise the city in a specially equipped van to
exchange contaminated needles for clean ones and offer intravenous drug
users information and assistance. They are also expected to interview
clients about their drug use and sexual practices and to encourage HIV
testing and drug treatment.

Health specialists, who objected vehemently to the amendment offered by
Rep. Todd Tiahrt (R-Kan.) in the federal budget measure, say that such
programs reduce the transmission of the AIDS virus and other blood-borne
diseases without increasing drug use.

That is the view of nearly every District health official, but Tiahrt
disputed their conclusions and said it was wrong for local taxpayers to
back the effort. Because of Congress's special oversight of the District,
his amendment affected only the District. More than 100 such programs in
more than 30 states are unaffected and may continue to use local funds.

"People at the Department of Health reviewed the issue, and out of an
abundance of caution, not wanting to take any chance whatever in violating
Congress's directions, initially erred on the side of not certifying the
program," said Ferren spokesman Walter Smith.

"Congress didn't intend for a moment to stop private groups from carrying
out this program," he said. "We think Congress certainly would have wanted
that any private group does it in a way that meets medical requirements,
and that's all that certification is designed to achieve."
-------------------------------------------------------------------

DEA Reconsiders Hemp Regulations (A letter from Thomas Constantine,
head of the US Drug Enforcement Administration, to Hawaii Senator
Daniel Inouye, says DEA is "determining the feasibility of establishing
a production level of cannabis that is consistent with the public interest
in controlling drugs of abuse and recognizes the commercial interest
in the cultivation of Cannabis sativa L. for fiber." Unfortunately,
Constatine sidesteps the issue of why DEA officials have been lobbying
against industrial hemp agricultural research in Hawaii.)

Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1998 21:11:07 -0500
To: drchemp@drcnet.org, hemp-talk@hemp.net
From: Richard Lake (rlake@mapinc.org)
Subject: HT: DEA Re-Considers Hemp Regulations (FWD)
Sender: owner-hemp-talk@hemp.net
Newshawk: agfuture@kih.net

Author:

U.S. Department of Justice
Drug Enforcement Administration

Office of the Administrator Washington, D.C. 20537

December 04, 1998

Honorable Daniel Inouye
United States Senate
Washington, D.C. 20510

Dear Senator Inouye:

I am following up on my interim reply of July 29, 1998, in response to
your letter of July 15, 1998, on behalf of Hawaii State Representative
Cynthia Thielen. In her letter, Representative Thielen expressed
concern that Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) officials are
lobbying against industrial hemp agricultural research in Hawaii
before Neighborhood Boards.

I apologize for the confusion regarding the issue of whether ASAC
Sidney Hayakawa did or did not attend the Kalihi-Palama Neighborhood
meeting. The statement in my May 28, 1998 letter that ASAC Hayakawa
did not attend the meeting was based on his statements to Headquarters
staff. In addition, he was provided a copy of the May 28, 1998 letter
prior to sending it to your office. However, after ASAC Hayakawa was
advised by Sara Daly of your staff of the second letter from
Representative Thielen, he then advised Headquarters that in fact he
had attended the meeting. Although the reasons for these contracting
versions are attributed by ASAC Hayakawa to a lack of communications,
nevertheless I can assure you that our first letter was written in
good faith.

With respect to hemp, due to the recent commercial interest in its
cultivation, DEA is reviewing the security regulations pertaining to
the cultivation of Cannabis sativa L. for industrial purposes, to
include hemp. DEA is determining the feasibility of establishing a
production level of cannabis that is consistent with the public
interest in controlling drugs of abuse and recognizes the commercial
interest in the cultivation of Cannabis sativa L. for fiber.

If I can be of further assistance in this, or any other matter, please
do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely,

Thomas A. Constantine
Administrator
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Secondhand Smoke, Alcohol Recommended As Carcinogens
(The Associated Press says a subcommittee of the National Toxicology
Program's Board of Scientific Counselors voted unanimously on Wednesday
to affirm the recommendations of two groups of government scientists
that secondhand smoke should be labeled a carcinogen. The panel
also concluded that alcohol can cause cancer. The subcommittee's vote
seems to have been motivated by a July decision by a federal judge
in North Carolina which found that the EPA's similar conclusion in 1993
was biased and unscientific.)

Date: Sun, 6 Dec 1998 14:42:24 -0800
From: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org (MAPNews)
To: mapnews@mapinc.org
Subject: MN: US: Secondhand Smoke, Alcohol Recommended As Carcinogens
Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org
Reply-To: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org
Organization: Media Awareness Project http://www.mapinc.org/lists/
Newshawk: Marcus/Mermelstein Family (mmfamily@ix.netcom.com)
Pubdate: Fri, 4 Dec 1998
Source: Associated Press
Copyright: 1998 Associated Press.
Author: Gary D. Robertson

SECONDHAND SMOKE, ALCOHOL RECOMMENDED AS CARCINOGENS

RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, N.C. -- An advisory commission's decision has paved
the way for secondhand smoke to be placed on the federal government's
official list of cancer-causing substances, over the tobacco industry's
strong objections.

The subcommittee of the National Toxicology Program's Board of Scientific
Counselors voted unanimously on Wednesday to affirm the recommendations of
two groups of government scientists that secondhand smoke should be labeled
a carcinogen.

The panel also concluded that alcoholic beverage consumption can lead to
cancer, and it noted that heavy drinkers and drinkers who smoke are most
susceptible to cancers of the mouth, esophagus, pharynx and larynx.

The panel made its findings in preparation for the ninth edition of the
Report on Carcinogens, the federal government's official list of
carcinogenic agents. The findings will be forwarded to the NTP director,
who will make recommendations to federal Health and Human Services
Secretary Donna Shalala.

In 1993, the federal Environmental Protection Agency declared that
secondhand smoke is a carcinogen. But the government report -- which had
been used to justify tougher smoking restrictions across the nation -- was
struck down in July by a North Carolina-based federal judge who said the
statistics did not show a significant association between the smoke and
cancer.

The latest report will be submitted to Congress and be released to the
public sometime next year.

The 13-0 vote on secondhand smoke came after two hours of debate at the
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.

Several panelists cited studies indicating that people with prolonged
exposure to environmental tobacco smoke have about a 20 percent higher risk
of developing lung cancer than those who aren't. Spouses and co-workers of
smokers have the greatest risk, the panel said.

Wednesday's decision frustrated members of the tobacco industry.

``The smoker's right to smoke is being impeded upon in a smoke-free
society,'' said Gio Batta Gori, who represented Brown & Williamson Tobacco
Corp. ``Environmental tobacco smoke is an unavoidable nuisance, but there
is no link between (secondhand smoke) and an increased risk of lung cancer.''

Panelists, most of whom are university researchers, seemed visibly
irritated by the research cited by the tobacco industry, some of which has
not been published.

``If it's not published, how can we take it into account in this kind of
setting and at this speed?'' asked Steven Belinsky with the Inhalation
Toxicology Research Institute in New Mexico.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Citibank Role Criticized In Mexican Money Case (According to
The Chicago Tribune, a report by the General Accounting Office
says Citibank executives ignored some of the bank's safeguards
against the laundering of illicit funds in order to do business
with Raul Salinas de Gortari, a brother of the former President of Mexico.)

Date: Sat, 5 Dec 1998 15:40:10 -0800
From: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org (MAPNews)
To: mapnews@mapinc.org
Subject: MN: US: Citibank Role Criticized In Mexican Money Case
Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org
Reply-To: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org
Organization: Media Awareness Project http://www.mapinc.org/lists/
Newshawk: Steve Young
Pubdate: 4 Dec 1998
Source: Chicago Tribune (IL)
Section: Sec. 1
Copyright: 1998 Chicago Tribune Company
Contact: tribletter@aol.com
Website: http://www.chicagotribune.com/
Author: New York Times News Service

CITIBANK ROLE CRITICIZED IN MEXICAN MONEY CASE

Eager to do business with Raul Salinas de Gortari, a brother of the
former President of Mexico, Citibank executives ignored some of the
bank's safeguards against the laundering of illicit funds, a
congressional report says.

As the bankers took in millions of dollars from Salinas, they never
asked for standard information on his financial background and made
virtually no effort to verify the source of the money, the report said.

After Salinas was arrested for murder in 1995 and lawyers for the bank
had begun monitoring his accounts, his personal banker in New York
quietly advised Salinas' wife to move the money elsewhere, apparently
without the consent of the legal department.

And even when Citibank finally warned federal officials about Salinas'
suspicious transactions and after the wife also had been arrested, the
bank failed to tell the government about the network of foreign shell
companies and offshore accounts that the bank had set up to shield the
Salinas fortune.

The disclosures, in a report by the General Accounting Office, the
investigative arm of Congress, represent the most detailed accounting
yet of how Salinas used a special Citibank unit reserved for the
wealthiest customers to move up to $100 million out of Mexico secretly.

Salinas and the bank have repeatedly denied wrongdoing. Whether any
U.S. laws were broken remains unclear.

Federal prosecutors in New York are continuing to investigate the
possibility that Citibank, a unit of Citigroup Inc., illegally
laundered the money. Officials at the Justice Department and the
Federal Reserve Bank refused to discuss the case with congressional
investigators.

The investigation underscores why federal regulators are stepping up
scrutiny of the high-end services called private banking and why they
have begun to propose steps for banks to track customers' financial
movements and backgrounds more closely.

"We determined in the Salinas scenario that Citibank's voluntary
controls did not work," the investigators wrote. "Citibank, while
violating only one aspect of its then policies, facilitated a
money-managing system that disguised the origin, destination and
beneficial owner of the funds involved."

The study was issued weeks after Swiss authorities had moved to
confiscate $114 million from Salinas, asserting that the funds were
protection money paid by drug traffickers. Mexican officials also
recently announced that they had frozen an additional $119 million in
a maze of other accounts that Salinas controlled.

In a statement Thursday, the bank said the report "contains errors of
fact and interpretation."

A spokesman for the bank, Richard Howe, would neither detail the
errors nor address any specific issues in the case.

The report also noted that officials in the Office of the Comptroller
of the Currency, which has not investigated the case, believed that
the civil bank-secrecy statute had probably not been violated. The law
says prosecutors can only prove that Salinas or the bank violated
money-laundering statutes if they first show that the money was from
an unlawful source. The prosecutors would then have to demonstrate
that the bank knew or should have known that the money was illicit.

Law-enforcement officials familiar with the case said their principal
challenge had been to amass enough evidence to prove in a criminal
trial that Salinas had earned his money by one of the handful of
crimes, such as drug trafficking, that are covered abroad under the
federal money-laundering statutes.

Swiss investigators, who faced a much lower evidentiary threshold to
confiscate Salinas' deposits there, based their case in part on
statements by convicted drug traffickers imprisoned in the United
States. Although U.S. officials have dismissed some of those potential
witnesses as unreliable, they said others were considered credible.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Citibank Cut Corners for Salinas (The Cox Interactive Media version
in The Austin American-Statesman)

Date: Wed, 9 Dec 1998 11:06:04 -0800
From: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org (MAPNews)
To: mapnews@mapinc.org
Subject: MN: US: Citibank Cut Corners for Salinas
Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org
Reply-To: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org
Organization: Media Awareness Project http://www.mapinc.org/lists/
Newshawk: General Pulaski
Pubdate: Fri, 04 Dec 1998
Source: Austin American-Statesman (TX)
Contact: letters@statesman.com
Website: http://www.Austin360.com/
Copyright: 1998 Cox Interactive Media, Inc.

CITIBANK CUT CORNERS FOR SALINAS

U.S. report says bank ignored safeguards against money laundering

Eager to do business with Raul Salinas de Gortari, a brother of the former
president of Mexico, Citibank executives ignored some of the bank's own
safeguards against the laundering of illicit funds, a U.S. congressional
report says.

As the bankers took in millions of dollars from Salinas, they never asked
for standard information on his financial background and made virtually no
effort to verify the source of the money, the report said.

After Salinas was arrested for murder in 1995 and lawyers for the bank had
begun monitoring his accounts, his personal banker in New York quietly
advised Salinas' wife, Paulina Castanon, to move the money elsewhere,
apparently without the consent of the legal department.

And even when Citibank finally alerted federal officials to Salinas'
suspicious transactions, and after Castanon had been arrested as well, the
bank failed to tell the government about the network of foreign shell
companies and offshore accounts that the bank had set up to shield the
Salinas fortune.

The disclosures, in a report by the General Accounting Office, the
investigative arm of Congress, represent the most detailed accounting yet
of how Salinas used a special Citibank unit reserved for the wealthiest
customers to secretly move up to $100 million out of Mexico.

Salinas and the bank have repeatedly denied wrongdoing. Whether any U.S.
laws were broken remains unclear.

The study was issued weeks after Swiss authorities had moved to confiscate
$114 million from Salinas, asserting that the funds were protection money
paid by drug traffickers. Mexican officials also recently announced that
they had frozen an additional $119 million in a maze of other accounts
that Salinas controlled.

In a statement Thursday, the bank said the report "contains errors of fact
and interpretation."

Testifying as a government witness in an earlier money-laundering case, the
Citibank executive who worked on Salinas' account, Amy Elliott, suggested
that the bank's "know your customer" policies were fundamental to its
efforts to avoid easing the way for illegal transactions.

Although Elliott stated that she and her colleagues had evaluated their
potential customers carefully, checking their business dealings and credit
backgrounds and visiting them up to 12 times a year, the congressional
investigators found that she worked quite differently with Salinas.

"Citibank made no attempt to investigate Salinas' background before
accepting him" as a customer in 1992, the report states.

It notes that Elliott, still an employee in good standing, filed neither a
standard financial profile nor a financial background check. Nor, as bank
policy required, did she ask to have the requirement for a profile waived.

Although Salinas had never been formally accused of wrongdoing in
connection with Citibank, rumors of possible corruption were widespread in
Mexican financial circles. Nonetheless, Elliott later told prosecutors in a
deposition, she thought of her new customer as something akin to "a
Rockefeller."

Elliott said in her statement that she believed that much of Salinas' money
came from the sale of a construction company. But as the deposits flowed
in, generating $1.1 million in fees, bank officials never learned the
company's name.

Under the system Elliott devised, Castanon, Salinas' wife, would pick up
cashier's checks in pesos at Mexican banks, carry them to the Citibank
subsidiary in Mexico City, convert them to dollars and wire them to New
York, using the name Patricia Rios, a first name that she did not use,
combined with her mother's maiden name.

Congressional investigators, like Swiss detectives before them, were unable
to establish the source of the pesos that Salinas kept in Mexican banks.
But if he had received drug bribes, they would have almost certainly been
paid in American dollars, the currency in which drugs are generally sold.

>From Mexico, Salinas' money went to a Citibank account in New York that
disguised its origins by mixing it with deposits from other banks and
customers. The funds were then sent to Swiss and British accounts in the
name of a Cayman Islands shell corporation, Trocca Ltd., that was run by
three other offshore shell companies but secretly controlled by Salinas.

The congressional report states that after Salinas' arrest in February
1995, Elliott filed a brief financial profile and went to Mexico City
without the knowledge or consent of the bank's legal representative to try
to persuade Castanon to close her husband's Citibank accounts.

Castanon finally did try to consolidate the holdings, but was arrested in
Switzerland that November. Only then did Citibank file a criminal referral
form, the congressional report states, but it neglected to mention Trocca
or the Swiss or British accounts.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Mexico Cops Arrest Man For Massacre (The Associated Press says Tijuana police
have arrested Hector Flores Esquivias, an alleged member of the gang
blamed in the September massacre of 19 people in the city of Ensenada.
Also arrested was Cruz Medina Perez, believed to be the wife of the gang's
alleged leader, Arturo Martinez Gonzalez. Apparently the evidence
linking Flores to the massacre hasn't been disclosed yet.)

Date: Sat, 5 Dec 1998 06:35:37 -0800
From: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org (MAPNews)
To: mapnews@mapinc.org
Subject: MN: Mexico: Mexico Cops Arrest Man For Massacre
Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org
Reply-To: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org
Organization: Media Awareness Project http://www.mapinc.org/lists/
Newshawk: General Pulaski
Pubdate: Fri, 04 Dec 1998
Source: Associated Press
Copyright: 1998 Associated Press.

MEXICO COPS ARREST MAN FOR MASSACRE

MEXICO CITY (AP) Tijuana police have arrested an alleged member of the gang
blamed in the September massacre of 19 people in the Baja California city of
Ensenada, prosecutors said.

Arrested with Hector Flores Esquivias was Cruz Medina Perez, believed to be
the wife of the gang's alleged leader, Arturo Martinez Gonzalez. Police
found one-fifth of an ounce of metamphetamine in the truck the two were
traveling in, prosecutors said Thursday.

When they were stopped, both suspects showed police fake drivers' licenses
under other names. Both were charged with drug possession and falsifying
documents. Flores Esquivias also faces an outstanding warrant related to the
massacre.

On Sept. 17, gunmen rousted from bed an alleged drug trafficker and 18
members of his family, including eight children. They were lined up against
a wall and shot near the Baja beach resort of Ensenada.

Federal prosecutors said the gang of Martinez Gonzalez carried out the
killings to stop one of the victim's marijuana-smuggling operation from
becoming too competitive.

Police say the gang has connections to Ramon Arellano Felix, an alleged drug
trafficker on the FBI's list of 10 most-wanted crime suspects.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Oaxacan Police Chief Resigns (The Associated Press says Jose Mendez Rico,
the chief of police for Mexico's southern Oaxaca state, resigned
after two days on the job and one day after news reports linked him
to a powerful drug cartel.)

Date: Mon, 7 Dec 1998 21:35:29 -0800
From: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org (MAPNews)
To: mapnews@mapinc.org
Subject: MN: Mexico: Wire: Oaxacan Police Chief Resigns
Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org
Reply-To: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org
Organization: Media Awareness Project http://www.mapinc.org/lists/
Newshawk: General Pulaski
Pubdate: Fri, 04 Dec 1998
Source: Associated Press
Copyright: 1998 Associated Press.

OAXACAN POLICE CHIEF RESIGNS

OAXACA CITY, Mexico (AP) The chief of police in Mexico's southern Oaxaca
state resigned after two days on the job, authorities confirmed Friday, a
day after news reports linking him to a powerful drug cartel.

Police Chief Jose Mendez Rico was appointed by the state's new governor,
Jose Murta, even though Mendez Rico was mentioned last year in court
testimony as a contact for the Juarez cocaine cartel.

The state attorney general's office denied he had been fired, saying Mendez
Rico had quit for "health reasons." Speculation had surrounded his departure
Thursday, with various reports attributing the resignation to health
problems in his family or his inability to calm a local feud.

In the testimony, originally published by the news magazine Proceso in
February 1997 and reproduced Friday by the local Cantera daily, Gen. Jesus
Gutierrez Rebollo said Mendez Rico "was one of the persons to contact to
reach the head of the Ciudad Juarez cartel, Amado Carrillo."

Gutierrez Rebollo, Mexico's former drug czar, later was fired and jailed
after authorities determined he was protecting drug traffickers.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

US, Caribbean Troops Prepare for Marijuana Mission (The Associated Press
says six US Marine Corps helicopters will ferry more than 120 troops
from the Caribbean Regional Security Service and local police next week
to uproot and burn marijuana plants on the Caribbean island nation
of St. Vincent. The Marijuana Farmers movement, which claims to have
800 members, sent a letter to President Clinton on Thursday demanding
compensation for lost marijuana plants.)

Date: Sun, 6 Dec 1998 15:50:49 -0800
From: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org (MAPNews)
To: mapnews@mapinc.org
Subject: MN: St.Vincent: Wire: U.S., Caribbean Troops Prepare for Marijuana
Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org
Reply-To: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org
Organization: Media Awareness Project http://www.mapinc.org/lists/
Newshawk: DrugSense
Source: Associated Press
Copyright: 1998 The Associated Press.
Pubdate: 4 Dec 1998

U.S., CARIBBEAN TROOPS PREPARE FOR MARIJUANA MISSION

SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico (AP) -- Caribbean troops will be rappelling from U.S.
helicopters and learning how to avoid booby traps in dense tropical foliage
this weekend, preparing for a mission to destroy marijuana on the island
nation of St. Vincent.

Training is beginning despite protests from hundreds of marijuana growers,
who say they have no way to make a legal living.

"At this time of year, if the U.S. comes here and destroys our plantations,
that will spell hardship and the business sector will feel the pinch for
Christmas," said protest leader Junior Cottle.

His new Marijuana Farmers movement, which claims to have 800 members, sent
a letter to President Clinton on Thursday demanding compensation for lost
marijuana plants.

Six U.S. Marine Corps helicopters will ferry more than 120 troops from the
Caribbean Regional Security Service and St. Vincent police force next week
to uproot and burn marijuana plants on remote northern plots.

The two-week operation, targeting mountainous terrain near the 4,000-foot
Soufriere Volcano, was requested by St. Vincent and the Grenadines' prime
minister, Sir James Mitchell.

Similar operations in recent years destroyed millions of plants in
Trinidad, St. Kitts, St. Lucia, Dominica and Antigua. But none have stirred
the kind of organized protest seen in St. Vincent.

Without their plants, the farmers say unemployment in St. Vincent and the
Grenadines will rise above today's 40 percent. That, coupled with U.S.
action against the Caribbean's vital banana industry, could lead to unrest,
they said.

"We have 8,000 people whose livelihood depends on marijuana," said Cottle.

With an estimated 12,350 acres in production, St. Vincent is the eastern
Caribbean's largest marijuana producer. Most is consumed on neighboring
islands.

St. Vincent business leaders concede that, although illegal, marijuana has
become important to their economy. And it could become even more important,
because the United States has successfully challenged a European Union
quota system that was crucial to the region's banana industry.

How much the marijuana crop is worth isn't known. But when the harvest
comes in, soda trucks return to their Kingstown bases empty, and downtown
store do a brisker business, said Martin Barnard, president of the Chamber
of Industry and Commerce.

"They told me they're in trouble -- the jobs are not there, they have
children to support, they have to turn to the hills to farm marijuana,"
said Barnard. "I am sympathetic to all that ... but at the end of the day
we had to say, 'Fellows, it is illegal."'

Mitchell and other Caribbean leaders have long warned that, without a
European market for their bananas, many farmers will turn to marijuana or
to smuggling cocaine and heroin. In St. Vincent, population 110,000, the
banana industry employs up to 60 percent of the workforce.

But Mitchell told the farmers that tolerating their illegal work could lead
to U.S. sanctions. Many farmers planned to harvest their plants before the
U.S. helicopters arrive.

U.S. officials say the Marines will only transport troops, not destroy
plants. But there are risks, said Marine Lt. Col. Jeff Douglass.

Regional troops will be trained to detect booby traps, such as shaved
bamboo sticks in pits or crude pipe guns fired by trip wires, Douglass said.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

IOC Attempt To Resolve Doping Dilemma (Reuters says FIFA president
Sepp Blatter and his International Olympic Committee counterpart
Juan Antonio Samaranch will meet in Switzerland next month in an attempt
to resolve their differences on proposed common rules regarding doping
offenders.)

Date: Fri, 4 Dec 1998 16:21:14 -0800
From: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org (MAPNews)
To: mapnews@mapinc.org
Subject: MN: Switzerland WIRE: Ioc Attempt To Resolve Doping Dilemma
Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org
Reply-To: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org
Organization: Media Awareness Project http://www.mapinc.org/lists/
Newshawk: General Pulaski
Pubdate: Fri, 04 Dec 1998
Source: Reuters
Copyright: 1998 Reuters Limited.
Author: Steve Keating

IOC ATTEMPT TO RESOLVE DOPING DILEMMA

ZURICH, Dec 4 (Reuters) - FIFA president Sepp Blatter and his International
Olympic Committee counterpart Juan Antonio Samaranch will meet next month
in an attempt to resolve their differences on proposed common rules
regarding doping offenders.

Last week international sports leaders meeting in Lausanne moved a step
nearer creating a common united policy against drug abuse, but
FIFA, along with the international cycling and tennis federations, have
strong reservations about the implications of such measures on their sports.

Blatter said on Friday that while FIFA supported the idea of random
out-of-competition testing, it was concerned about the all embracing
anti-doping policy being developed by the IOC.

"We continue to have serious reservations about IOC proposals which I will
discuss with Mr Samaranch when we meet on January 6," said Blatter.

"We are a team sport, a highly professional sport, not an individual sport.
Football players with the EU are considered workers and this presents legal
problems."

Because of the potential legal quagmire, FIFA beleives the automatic
two-year ban for anyone testing positive for a banned substance now being
considered by the IOC, is unenforcable and that there should be some
flexibility built in to any future sanctions.

Blatter and Samaranch's meeting comes before a key world conference on
doping in sport being held in Lausanne in February when the IOC hope a
common anti-doping code can be agreed.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

The Week Online with DRCNet, Issue No. 69 (The Drug Reform Coordination
Network's original summary of drug policy news and calls to action includes -
DRCNet projects and campaigns; Alert - show of support needed for New Jersey
needle exchange; US Congress triples military aid To Colombia; Report -
New York state now spending more on prisons than higher education; Drug war
perjury highlighted in Congressional impeachment hearings; Thousands protest
at US Army School of the Americas; Swiss legalization referendum fails, but
provides hopeful signs for future; Coalition seeking DC election results
grows; and an editorial, Criminalizing our children, by Adam J. Smith.)

Date: Fri, 04 Dec 1998 08:16:54 -0500
To: drc-natl@drcnet.org
From: DRCNet (drcnet@drcnet.org)
Subject: The Week Online with DRCNet, Issue No. 69
Sender: owner-drc-natl@drcnet.org

The Week Online with DRCNet, Issue No. 69 -- December 4, 1998
A Publication of the Drug Reform Coordination Network

-------- PLEASE COPY AND DISTRIBUTE --------

(To sign off this list, mailto:listproc@drcnet.org with the
line "signoff drc-natl" in the body of the message, or
mailto:lists@drcnet.org for assistance. To subscribe to
this list, visit http://www.drcnet.org/signup.html.)

(This issue can be also be read on our web site at
http://www.drcnet.org/wol/069.html. Check out the DRCNN
weekly radio segment at http://www.drcnet.org/drcnn/.)

PERMISSION to reprint or redistribute any or all of the
contents of The Week Online is hereby granted. We ask that
any use of these materials include proper credit and, where
appropriate, a link to one or more of our web sites. If
your publication customarily pays for publication, DRCNet
requests checks payable to the organization. If your
publication does not pay for materials, you are free to use
the materials gratis. In all cases, we request notification
for our records, including physical copies where material
has appeared in print. Contact: Drug Reform Coordination
Network, 2000 P St., NW, Suite 615, Washington, DC 20036,
(202) 293-8340 (voice), (202) 293-8344 (fax), e-mail
drcnet@drcnet.org. Thank you.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. DRCNet Projects and Campaigns
http://www.drcnet.org/wol/069.html#projects

2. ALERT: Show of Support Needed for New Jersey Needle
Exchange
http://www.drcnet.org/wol/069.html#chaiproject

3. U.S. Congress Triples Military Aid To Colombia
http://www.drcnet.org/wol/069.html#colombia

4. REPORT: New York State Now Spending More on Prisons than
Higher Education
http://www.drcnet.org/wol/069.html#newyork

5. Drug War Perjury Highlighted In Congressional Impeachment
Hearings
http://www.drcnet.org/wol/069.html#perjury

6. Thousands Protest at U.S. Army School of the Americas
http://www.drcnet.org/wol/069.html#soa

7. Swiss Legalization Referendum Fails, but Provides Hopeful
Signs for Future
http://www.drcnet.org/wol/069.html#droleg

8. Coalition Seeking DC Election Results Grows
http://www.drcnet.org/wol/069.html#dcvote

9. EDITORIAL: Criminalizing our Children
http://www.drcnet.org/wol/069.html#editorial

***

1. DRCNet Projects and Campaigns

To our readers: We are back after a much-needed
Thanksgiving break, and hope that everyone had an enjoyable
holiday weekend. Here at DRCNet, things are moving fast and
1999 is shaping up to be a breakthrough year for us as well
as for the movement. As we head into the home stretch of
what has been an exciting 1998, we hope that you will
consider supporting DRCNet's work. (We're facing a cash
crunch at the moment!) Why, you may ask, should you dig
deep to send us a check (or even another check), when there
are so many worthy causes and organizations vying for your
support? Here are just a few of the reasons:

* DRCNet's weekly syndicated radio news show, DRCNN, is
already being carried on over a dozen stations, in at least
three countries, after just two months of production, and
feedback from those stations has been excellent. The show
costs us around $200 per week to produce (including staff-
time), and we also need to be able to promote it to stations
across the country. A $200 donation (or eight $25
donations) will pay for one show in its entirety. A $500
donation will pay for two weeks of promotions and will help
us to get DRCNN on the air on perhaps dozens of new stations
who do not yet know that we exist. (You can hear the show
in Real Audio online at http://www.drcnet.org/drcnn/.)
Donations to support DRCNN can be made to the DRCNet
Foundation (tax-deductible), or to the Drug Reform
Coordination Network (not tax-deductible, better for us if
it's just as good for you).

* DRCNet's campus project, U-Net, has launched a nationwide
campaign in opposition to language in the 1998 Higher
Education Act which delays or denies financial aid to any
student who has been convicted of any drug offense,
including possession. Our resolution calling on the 106th
Congress to repeal the provision is already being presented
by students to their student governments on over 50 campuses
for their support. There is also media campaign in the
works, which will be launched early in 1999, in support of
this effort. Kris Lotlikar is our point person on this
project (in addition to all of his other responsibilities
here), and while he does work cheap, he cannot work for
nothing. Ten $35 donations, or one $325 donation will cover
Kris' pay and the associated expenses for a week. A $1,000
donation will fund the media campaign. (Check out the U-Net
site at http://www.drcnet.org/U-net/.) Donations to
support the Higher Education Act project, and Kris' work as
membership coordinator, must be made to the Drug Reform
Coordination Network (because of its legislative nature),
and are not tax-deductible.

* We are developing the stopthedrugwar.org web site as a
gateway to the issue and the movement. Take a look at the
initial portions, online at http://www.stopthedrugwar.org.
When complete, stopthedrugwar.org will provide visitors
pointers to news, educational resources, discussion groups,
membership and activist organizations and other
opportunities for involvement in whatever areas of drug
policy interest them the most. Help DRCNet build the
movement by supporting stopthedrugwar.org. Donations to
support stopthedrugwar.org can be made to the DRCNet
Foundation (tax-deductible) or the Drug Reform Coordination
Network (not tax-deductible). (We are developing
stopthedrugwar.org in preparation for a massive outreach
campaign to build the movement. The outreach project will
be described in another Week Online in the very near
future.)

* DRCNet continues to count on non-tax deductible donations
from our membership for our lobbying efforts. In the coming
year there will be numerous drug war-related bills on the
Hill and in statehouses across the nation. Our subscribers
will of course be alerted to them so that their voices can
be heard, both at the state and the federal level. In the
wake of the phenomenally successful 1998 election results,
it is more important than ever that lawmakers hear from
their reform-minded constituents when they consider their
upcoming votes on these issues. Most of our grants and
major gifts are made to the DRCNet Foundation, which spend
very little of its money on lobbying. Hence, your non-
deductible gifts to the Drug Reform Coordination Network,
large or small, play the most important role in enabling us
to issue our grassroots legislative alerts. Your non-
deductible membership dues of $25, or donations of $50,
$100, $250, $500 or $1,000 to the Drug Reform Coordination
Network, represent citizen action directly at work in the
democratic process.

These are just a few of the things we are working on here at
DRCNet. As you can see, your support is vital to our
efforts, and every dollar produces results. As the year
winds down, please consider making a donation, or increasing
your level of support for 1998. If you'd like, please feel
free to specify a particular project or campaign with your
check. Donations not specified for a given program will go
toward one of the projects above, or else toward our general
operating budget, as needed. If you'd like your donation to
be tax deductible, please make checks payable to the DRCNet
Foundation. Non-deductible donations should be made out to
the Drug Reform Coordination Network. Thanks!

To donate, please use our online registration form at
https://www.drcnet.org/cgi-shl/drcreg.cgi (secure, encrypted
version for credit card donations) or
http://www.drcnet.org/cgi-shl/drcreg.cgi (unencrypted
version, use either version to create a printable form to
mail in with your check or money order), or just mail your
donation to: DRCNet, 2000 P St., NW, Suite 615, Washington,
DC 20036. Note that donations to the DRCNet Foundation
should only be made by check, as the Foundation doesn't yet
have a credit card merchant account.

***

2. ALERT: Show of Support Needed for New Jersey Needle
Exchange

Diana McCague will appear in New Brunswick Municipal Court
on December 17th at 1:00pm on a single charge of syringe
possession stemming from her arrest by investigators from
the Middlesex County Prosecutor's office on September 29,
1998 (see http://www.drcnet.org/wol/061.html#chaibust). We
must show the judge, the prosecutor, the community, and New
Jersey's elected officials that Diana does not stand alone
in her commitment to keeping drug users and their families
and communities in New Jersey safe from HIV and other
disease and injury which can result from the use of illicit
drubgs.

There will not be a trial. Diana is expecting to plead
guilty under the terms of a negotiated plea agreement.
However, Diana will make a statement to the court and it is
possible that the judge will question her before imposing
sentence. The sentence could include: up to two years
driver's license suspension, up to six months in jail and as
much as $1000 in fines.

An orderly but passionate crowd of supporters will send the
desired message -- New Jersey's elected officials will be
watching. This is an opportunity for those concerned about
the issue of syringe exchange in New Jersey to make their
commitment known! For further information, call the New
Jersey Harm Reduction Coalition at (732) 247-3242.

***

3. U.S. Congress Triples Military Aid To Colombia

Congressional Republicans this week passed an initiative
which will triple the amount of aid, mostly in the form of
military hardware, being sent to Colombia. The move, which
surprised even Andres Pastrana, Colombia's new president,
appears to have been the result of direct communications
between congressional Republicans and General Rosso Jose
Serrano, chief of Colombia's national police force.

The approval of military aid, including upgraded Huey and
Blackhawk helicopters, directly to the National Police,
worries critics who point out that the police have
consistently blurred the lines between fighting the
narcotics trade and fighting the insurgency forces within
the context of Colombia's thirty-five year old civil war.
Adam Isaacson of the Center for International Policy told
the New York Times that the move has the potential to
increase America's involvement in that conflict. "It's
another step in the wrong direction" he told The Times.

This comes at a time when Pastrana has already involved his
government in the most aggressive peace initiative in recent
memory. Already, Pastrana has pulled his military forces
from an area the size of Switzerland as a show of faith
leading up to the beginning of talks with the rebels.

The increase in aid "surprised everybody," said Rodrigo
Lloreda, Colombia's defense minister. Statements such as
this underscore the disconnect between Congress' actions and
the will, or at least the plans of the new government,
despite the feelings of the U.S. lawmakers who engineered
the increase. "I look at this as giving Colombia the
support it needs to do what it wants to do," Senator Mike
DeWine (R-OH) told The Times. "It will put the government
in a better bargaining position."

But such statements only serve to highlight the blurring of
the lines between counter insurgency, in which the U.S. has
previously avoided getting involved, and counternarcotics
operations which, though largely unsuccessful, some would
say futile, remain a darling of the drug warriors. In fact,
in an apparent effort to justify the crossover in the use of
American Aid by Colombia, many advocates have begun to use
the phrase "narco-guerillas" when referring to the rebels.

Cynthia Arnson, Senior Program Associate for International
Policy at the Woodrow Wilson Center, told The Week Online
"The trouble is that it is very unrealistic when we hear
officials from either nation struggling to make rhetorical
distinctions between the two operations, when those on the
ground know that no such distinction is being made in
practice."

The difficulty stems from the fact that some portion of the
nation's estimated 15,000 rebel troops are making money from
protection taxes levied against traffickers operating in
regions under their control. The situation is further
complicated by the fact that experts agree that all sides in
the conflict are benefiting from drug profits to one degree
or another. Colombia's previous president, in fact, became
persona non grata in the US after allegations that he took
over $6 million from traffickers for his election campaign.
The country's former drug czar is currently in prison
awaiting trial on charges of drug corruption.

***

4. REPORT: NY State Now Spending More On Prisons Than Higher
Education

A report issued this week (12/1) by the Correctional
Association of New York and the Washington DC-based Justice
Policy Institute reveals that over the past ten years, New
York State has increased its spending on prisons by nearly
as much as it has decreased spending for higher education.
The culmination of ten years of education cuts and ten years
of prison spending increase is that in 1998, the state is
spending $1.5 billion on higher education and $1.76 billion
on prisons.

Robert Gangi, executive director of the Correctional
Association of New York, told The Week Online that it is the
drug war, above all else, that has driven New York's prison
population to 70,000 and prison spending to record highs.

"New York is home to the infamous Rockefeller Drug Laws,
perhaps the most extreme set of mandatory minimums in the
country, which have resulted in a stream of low-level, non-
violent offenders" said Gangi.

Gangi said that while the trend of less spending for
education and more for prisons was not surprising, he was
shocked by both the magnitude of the shift and by its
disparate racial impact.

"At one time in New York, higher education spending
outstripped prison spending by a 2-1 margin. Today we're
spending $260 million more on prisons than on education.
What was most disturbing however were some of the radial
breakdowns. New York State now has more people of color in
prison on drug convictions than are enrolled in the state
university system.

"The reality is that people of color, arrested and convicted
for drug offenses, mostly in New York City, are being used
as grist in an economic mill which provides jobs in the
corrections industry in rural upstate towns. Those towns,
of course, are primarily white."

Gangi believes that it is imperative to reform the
Rockefeller drug laws.

"The Rockefeller laws, because of their severity and because
they've been in place for some time now, are symbolic. If
we can make a dent here in reforming them, it will have a
trickle down effect on the rest of the country. The numbers
in this report reflect the situation in one state, but they
are indicative of what is going on in other states as well."

(The Correctional Association of New York/Justice Policy
Institute report is available online in full at
http://www.cjcj.org/jpi/nysomfront.html.)

***

5. Drug War Perjury Highlighted In Congressional Impeachment
Hearings

The ongoing congressional hearings on Presidential
Impeachment took a turn of interest for drug policy
reformers this week as Harvard Law School professor and
Author Alan Dershowitz testified that the President's
perjury pales in comparison with the culture of lying which
has become ingrained in the criminal justice system.
Dershowitz cited, among others, the Mollen Commission's
recent findings, which claimed that perjury was so rampant
among police officers that the practice had been given its
own term in some law enforcement circles, "testilying," and
Joseph McNamara, former chief of police of San Jose and
Kansas City, and current fellow at Stanford University's
Hoover Institution (and board member of the Drug Policy
Foundation), who said that "hundreds of thousands of law-
enforcement officers commit perjury every year testifying
about drug arrests alone."

Dershowitz testified that not only did the President's
misstatements under oath constitute the least important and
damaging form of perjury (lying to avoid personal
embarrassment where the lie was not materially relevant to
the substance of the proceedings), which he called the
nation's most common and least prosecuted crime, but that
perjury is prosecuted selectively, if at all, with
motivations ranging from the political to the tactical.

Dershowitz is far from the only national figure to point out
the prevalence of perjury in criminal, and specifically drug
enforcement, as evidenced by McNamara's quote. But it was
encouraging for reformers to hear the problem referenced on
such a national stage by such a respected figure.

The Week Online spoke with Professor Dershowitz.

WOL: In your testimony, you spoke about the impact of the
drug war, and its prosecution, on the criminal justice
process, particularly with regard to perjury by police
officers. What has been the impact of the drug war on the
system as a whole?

Dershowitz: Well, I think that drug wars have done more to
undercut civil liberties than perhaps any other phenomenon
in recent history. Start with the fact that we call it a
war, and all's fair in war. In the minds of many officers,
and prosecutors, they are just doing what they need to do to
fight the war.

WOL: So you believe that Prohibition is a failed policy?

Dershowitz: Criminalizing drugs has actually created crime,
and criminals. The drugs are out there, and we've insured
that they're valuable. The drug war corrupts by its very
nature.

WOL: How prevalent, in your view, has perjury become in the
prosecution of the war?

Dershowitz: Perjury by police is rampant, and the vast
majority of it concerns the circumstances of searches for
drugs. It (the drug war) has had a deeply corrosive impact
on the system in that regard. In most cases, there are no
complaining witnesses in a drug transaction, and so it is
far easier to convict if testimony is tailored to what the
prosecutor needs to hear.

WOL: How can this problem be addressed?

Dershowitz: We as a society are going to have to think very
hard about making changes in our response to drugs.
Obviously we need to decriminalize marijuana, that's an easy
issue. There are just no good arguments against it. We
also need to look into medicalizing heroin addiction, as
they are doing in some places in Europe. As to cocaine,
that's a little tougher issue. But there is no doubt that
there has to be a better system than we have now. We need
an open-minded inquiry into our drug policy, because the
current policy is causing tremendous damage.

***

6. Thousands Protest at U.S. Army School of the Americas

Last week, as many as 7,000 people showed up at Fort
Benning, outside of Atlanta, to protest the continued
operation of the Army's "School of the Americas" which is
housed at the base. The school, which trains specially
selected personnel culled from the militaries of Central and
South America, is known to its detractors as the "School of
the Assassins". It counts among its 60,000 graduates
Panamanian strongman Manuel Noriega, former Argentine
dictator Leopoldo Galtieri, Haitian coup leader Raoul Cedras
and Salvadoran death squad organizer the late Roberto
D'Aubuisson.

According to organizers, more than 2,300 people risked
arrest by entering the base. The protest was by far the
largest of the eight, which have been held annually since
1990. Last year, more than 600 people were arrested for
entering the base, and more than thirty of them served six
month sentences because it was their second such offense.

***

7. Swiss Legalization Referendum Fails, but Provides Hopeful
Signs for Future

In our last issue before the Thanksgiving holiday, we
reported that voters in the nation of Switzerland were to
decide November 29 on the legalization and regulation of
drugs (http://www.drcnet.org/wol/068.html#droleg). Droleg
did not pass, with 72% of voters opposed and 28% in support.

An exit poll found, however, that of those who voted against
the initiative, 40% would have voted for legalization of
marijuana only, yielding a majority in support of marijuana
legalization and suggesting hope for future reform in that
area. Opposition to the initiative focused on the concern
that by legalizing all drugs while their neighbors continue
to have prohibition, Switzerland could face large numbers of
"drug tourists" and resulting nuisance problems.

Earlier in the year, Swiss voters approved prescription
availability of heroin by a margin of 70-30, and doctors now
have the right to prescribe heroin to addicts. Opponents of
drug policy reform have portrayed the Droleg vote as a
reversal. Droleg's non-passage may, however, reflect
caution rather than outright opposition to the concept of
legalization. Swiss voters may simply want to see how well
heroin maintenance works, rather than proceeding swiftly and
dramatically to full legalization, before any other country
in the world. It is notable that a full 28% of Swiss voters
were aware enough of the consequences of prohibition to
support full legalization all at once and in advance of any
other European country. How would the Swiss vote have gone,
were it in the context of a European- or world-wide policy
shift? Perhaps more than 28% would have supported it.

***

8. Coalition Seeking DC Election Results Grows

Nine organizations, including the Washington, DC chapter of
the League of Women Voters, the Republican National African-
American Council, the Gertrude Stein Democratic Club and the
Libertarian National Committee have all filed "friend of the
court" briefs in support of the DC government and ACTUP DC's
lawsuit seeking the release of the results of the DC Medical
Marijuana, Initiative 59. The results of the election have
been kept secret in the wake of language added to the DC
appropriations bill by Congressman Bob Barr (R-GA)
forbidding the District from spending any money on any
initiative which would reduce, in any way, penalties for
marijuana possession or use.

The growing coalition of supporters is evidence, say
activists, of the federal government's inept handling of
everything having to do with medicinal marijuana. Robert
Kampia, director of governmental relations for the Marijuana
Policy Project told The Week Online, "The federal government
blesses us with new allies every time it rears its fascist
head on this issue. Groups like the League of Women Voters
were probably wholly unaware of the issues involved in
medical marijuana until the feds decided to try to quash the
results of a democratic election. Even the Washington Post,
which has been notoriously bad in its coverage of this
issue, has devoted an editorial as well as serious news
space to medical marijuana in the wake of the Barr
amendment.

"Congress is so beside itself on this issue, so eager to
make sure that sick people go to prison for their personal
medical choices," said Kampia, "that they are willing to run
roughshod over the constitution in an effort to impose their
will. The elections proved, however, that their will and
the people's will are two entirely different things. We can
only thank them for their absolute irrationality. It has
given activists the opportunity to involve and to educate a
much broader range of concerned citizens and organizations."

***

9. EDITORIAL: Criminalizing our Children

Last month a report was issued by Amnesty International
detailing the treatment of children by the United States
criminal justice system. The report found that there are
over 11,000 children, under the age of eighteen, currently
being held in prisons and other adult correctional
facilities in this country. The report also cited over
89,000 cases of children being placed in solitary
confinement for periods longer than 24 hours. According to
Amnesty, such treatment offends internationally accepted
standards. The U.S. incarcerates more of its children than
any other nation on earth.

For several years now, law enforcement officials and
politicians have courted the fears of the American public
with dire warnings of "super-predators," a generation of
children so violent, so evil, that they are barely human.
Despite several well-publicized cases, however, the fact is
that murderous children are the rare exception. Most
children who come into contact with the justice system are
there for far less nefarious reasons. Even of those who are
transferred into the adult criminal justice system, more
than half, according to the Center for Juvenile and Criminal
Justice, have been charged with non-violent offenses.

Children who are incarcerated are more than three times as
likely to re-offend as children charged with similar
offenses who are sentenced to a non-incarceratory
alternative. And children under the age of eighteen who are
incarcerated with adults are more than three times as likely
to be beaten by staff, more than five times as likely to be
raped, and more than eight times as likely to commit suicide
than children who are incarcerated in juvenile facilities.
Still, in the last session of Congress, legislation was
introduced which would have mandated that states transfer
out of the juvenile system children as young as fourteen who
are charged with certain offenses, both violent and non-
violent (including drug-related). The bill would have
encouraged, though not required, the transfer of thirteen
year-olds charged with such offenses.

The incarceration of children, large numbers of children,
horrendous as it is, should not be surprising in light of
current policies. It is, in fact, the predictable end-
product of a society that has slowly but surely criminalized
youth itself. In cities across the country, curfews have
been instituted, both at night and during school hours. The
effect, in some cities, is that for up to eighteen hours a
day, it is illegal for a teenager to be out in public
without his or her parents. When kids are allowed out on
the streets, they are often insufficient public spaces for
their activities. Go find a group of kids hanging out
anywhere in this country, and there's a good chance that at
least one of them has a key chain or a t-shirt emblazoned
with the phrase "skateboarding is not a crime." In many
parts of the country, running away from home is a criminal
act, regardless of the conditions of the home that the child
is fleeing.

Drugs, of course, play an enormous role in the
criminalization of youth. "Protecting the children" is the
most common excuse given for the imprisonment of hundreds of
thousands of American adults jailed for consensual acts.
But despite the ongoing war, the number of kids using drugs
has been unaffected, and they are using at younger and
younger ages. For many kids, drug use is very simply an act
of rebellion against an adult culture that seems oppressive.
The answer, of course, is to lock up more kids. Arrest them
for marijuana, arrest them for cigarettes, arrest them for
beer, arrest them for being out too late. If we're not
catching enough of them, drug test them. Drug test them for
school sports, for the chess club, drug test them when they
apply for drivers' licenses, or simply drug test them all.
Or else, as the town of Peekskill, New York is attempting to
do, place surveillance cameras in the places they hang out.
Find them. Catch them. Punish them. Our national motto,
it seems, is that it takes a prison to raise a child.

In the 1960's, the baby boomer generation, the ones whose
children are now such a threat to the fabric of society,
wore t-shirts warning not to trust anyone over thirty.
Today their sentiment is not to trust anyone under eighteen.
Perhaps they've forgotten what it's like to be young. Or
perhaps it is a generation so full of self-righteousness, so
convinced of their own infallibility and superiority, that
they simply don't trust anyone at all who is not a member of
their ranks. Whatever the reason, they are doing no favors
for their kids.

Today's children are growing up in a world where the state
has declared them suspect, and has been given absolute
authority to control their lives. Far from the day when an
errant child would be brought home by an officer of the law
to be dealt with by his or her parents, that child is now
routinely taken down to the station, booked, and thrown in a
cell with all the rest of the criminals. The parents, who
in another time would have had a long talk, or grounded the
kid or even tanned his hide for, say, smoking marijuana or
even dropping a tab of acid, will now frantically try to
secure the services of a lawyer (if they can afford one) and
will be left to hope and pray that the child is not
sentenced to jail or even held before trial, where he is at
risk of being raped or beaten.

Our children are criminals, and they know it all too well.
Why then should they obey our rules? Why should they
respect our authority? Why should they play the game? Out
of fear? That works only when they are in your line of
vision. Outside of that, your words, your rules, your
wishes will be respected only if the child respects you.
And respect is not what we engender when we send the state
out after our children. Jail them and they will reject
society. Surveille them and they will retreat to the
shadows. Drug test them and they will find substances for
which you are not testing. Teach them that the state is
all-powerful, that the power of the state is to be used as a
primary method of controlling behavior, and they will grow
up to use the power of the state to do things unintended by
our Constitution. Or they will overthrow it.

We will not solve the problems of adult society by making
criminals of our children. And we will not solve the
problems of our children by locking them up as if they were
adults. There are more than 11,000 children sitting right
now in American jails and prisons. Many of them are being
beaten. And raped. And scarred for life. Hundreds of
thousands of other children, living "free" are under the
constant scrutiny of the state. It is a perverse way to
raise the first American generation of the twenty-first
century. They will not always be children.

Adam J. Smith
Associate Director

***

DRCNet needs your support! Donations can be sent to 2000 P
St., NW, Suite 615, Washington, DC 20036, or made by credit
card at http://www.drcnet.org/drcreg.html. Donations to
the Drug Reform Coordination Network are not tax-deductible.
Deductible contributions supporting our educational work can
be made by check to the DRCNet Foundation, a 501(c)(3) tax-
exempt organization, same address.

***

DRCNet

***

GATEWAY TO REFORM PAGE	http://www.stopthedrugwar.org/
DRCNet HOME PAGE	http://www.drcnet.org/
DRUG POLICY LIBRARY	http://www.druglibrary.org/
JOIN/MAKE A DONATION	http://www.drcnet.org/drcreg.html
REFORMER'S CALENDAR	http://www.drcnet.org/calendar.html
SUBSCRIBE TO THIS LIST	http://www.drcnet.org/signup.html

-------------------------------------------------------------------

[End]

Top
The articles posted here are generally copyrighted by the source publications. They are reproduced here for educational purposes under the Fair Use Doctrine (17 U.S.C., section 107). NORML is a 501 (c)(3) non-profit educational organization. The views of the authors and/or source publications are not necessarily those of NORML. The articles and information included here are not for sale or resale.

Comments, questions and suggestions. E-mail

Reporters and researchers are welcome at the world's largest online library of drug-policy information, sponsored by the Drug Reform Coordination Network at: http://www.druglibrary.org/

Next day's news
Previous day's news

Back to the 1998 Daily News index for Dec. 3-9

Back to the Portland NORML news archive directory

Back to 1998 Daily News index (long)

This URL: http://www.pdxnorml.org/981204.html

Home