------------------------------------------------------------------- A Garden Gone To Seed (A letter to the editor of the Source, in Oregon, says locking up drug dealers and throwing away the key does no good so society as a whole, especially when forfeiture laws give police a motive to fabricate evidence.) Date: Sun, 7 Mar 1999 23:11:31 -0800 From: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org (MAPNews) To: mapnews@mapinc.org Subject: MN: US OR: PUB LTE: A Garden Gone To Seed Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Reply-To: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Organization: Media Awareness Project http://www.mapinc.org/lists/ Newshawk: Curt Wagoner Pubdate: Thur, 4 Mar 1999 Source: The Source (OR) Contact: thesource@empnet.com Website: www.sourceweekly.com Author: Ms. Linda Phelps A Garden Gone To Seed Democracy is like a flower garden. If we don't tend to it, it will fall into disrepair. We can't assume that just because our government was running smoothly yesterday, it's ok today. And we can't make decisions based on ideas such as "Whatever drug dealers get they deserve," or "should all be locked up." If we do this, we are letting the weeds overpower the flowers. I personally do not know very many "criminals" and it's hard to imagine problems that are happening right now as I write this. I'm talking about property being seized by police without due process. I'm sure this problem is occuring due to overcrowding caused by overpopulation but that doesn't make it right, and I think we have a responsibility to deal with these problems in a more humane and democratic way. Government officials become bounty hunters when they are given extra authority to deal with the "drug problem"; they use conspiracy tactics (arresting people for just associating with known drug dealers), plant drugs, are rarely made to be accountable for drugs they seize and therefore often have drugs with them. What if you are a writer like me and often associate with many different kinds of people while doing research? Do I need to check in with my local "Nazi" police everytime I want to do research? Are we going to to let our rights slip away just because we don't want to chop out the weeds? The government should not be allowed to confiscate private property. Ms. Linda Phelps Bend, Oregon
------------------------------------------------------------------- California NORML Report on 1999 State Marijuana Legislation (A bulletin from California NORML summarizes six bills that have been introduced to the legislature, and includes the URL for current legislative information and who to lobby.) Subject: DPFCA: Calif MJ Legislation Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 00:26:42 -0800 To: aro@drugsense.org, dpfca@drugsense.org From: canorml@igc.apc.org (Dale Gieringer) Reply-To: canorml@igc.apc.org (Dale Gieringer) California NORML Report on 1999 State Marijuana Legislation MEDICAL MARIJUANA: * S.B. 847: MEDICAL MARIJUANA RESEARCH: Sen. Vasconcellos has introduced this bill to establish a $1 million state medical marijuana research program. The program would be run by the University of California, or, if U.C. is not interested, by the state Research Advisory Panel. OUTLOOK: Expect this bill to be passed and signed into law by Gov. Davis. * S.B. 848 MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISTRIBUTION: Sen. Vasconcellos has introduced this dummy bill to create a medical marijuana distribution program. The final content of the bill will be based on the recommendations of Attorney General Lockyer's task force. OUTLOOK ??? It is unclear whether the task force will agree on any distribution legislation. ANTI-MARIJUANA: * SB 273: RAISE FINE FOR PERSONAL POSSESSION TO $1,000. (Current fine is $100 plus a mandatory license suspension, which expires on July 1st). This obnoxious bill is being sponsored by perennial pothibitionist Sen. Pete Knight (R-Palmdale). It has been referred to the State Senate Committee on Public Safety. OUTLOOK: Let the Senate know your views on this turkey! Write to Sen. Knight and Sen. Vasconcellos, chair, Public Safety Committee, State Capitol, Sacramento 95814. * ABX1 - 21: SUSPENSION OF STUDENTS FOR POT: Presently, students must be suspended and recommended for expulsion from school for possession of any controlled substance EXCEPT less than one ounce of pot. This bill would repeal the exception. ABX1 - 21 is sponsored by freshmen Republicans Ken Maddox (Anaheim), Charlene Zettel (San Diego) and Sam Aanestad (Grass Valley). PRISONS AND DRUGS: * SB 79: THREE STRIKES REFORM: Would restrict "Three Strikes" sentences to cases where the third strike is a serious or violent felony, so marijuana and other drug offenses would no longer count as third strikes. Sponsored by Sen. Tom Hayden (D-Santa Monica). OUTLOOK: Requires two-thirds majority. Needs support. * SB 1261: COMMISSION ON DRUG POLICY AND VIOLENCE: This bill by Sen. Tom Hayden (D-Santa Monica) would set up a state commission to study the impact of drug prohibition on violence. This could set the stage for future decriminalization legislation. OUTLOOK: Gov. Davis has no inclination to support drug reform now, but might be willing to consider a study. *** KEY SENATORS - PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE Sen. John Vasconcellos (D-San Jose), Chair 916-445-9740 Sen. Richard Rainey (R-Walnut Creek) Vice-chair 916-445-6083 Sen. Patrick Johnston (D-Sacramento) 916-445-2407 Sen. Bruce Mc Pherson (R-Santa Cruz) 916-445-5843 Sen. Richard Polanco (D-L.A.) 916-445-3456 Sen. John Burton (D-S.F.) 916-445-1412 Website for current legislative info: http://www.sen.ca.gov/~newsen/legislation/legislation.htp *** Mar. 2, 1999 Distributed by: California NORML (415) 563-5858 - canorml@igc.org www.norml.org/canorml - 2215R Market St. #278 San Francisco 94114. *** Dale Gieringer (415) 563-5858 // canorml@igc.apc.org 2215-R Market St. #278, San Francisco CA 94114
------------------------------------------------------------------- Alaska Medical Marijuana Law Starts (The Associated Press says the medical marijuana law approved by 60 percent of voters in November goes into effect today. Ned Tuthill wishes the law had come about a few years earlier. The retired airline pilot was busted for growing his own medicine to ease chronic pain caused by a severe car crash. The terms of his probation forbid him from smoking marijuana. "I have period of times when my pain is so severe that I just can't do anything," said Tuthill, 48, who says other pain medications nauseate him.) Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 17:27:04 -0800 From: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org (MAPNews) To: mapnews@mapinc.org Subject: MN: US AK: Wire: MMJ: Alaska Medical Marijuana Law Starts Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Reply-To: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Organization: Media Awareness Project http://www.mapinc.org/lists/ Newshawk: General Pulaski Pubdate: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 Source: Associated Press Copyright: 1999 Associated Press Author: Paul Queary, Associated Press Writer ALASKA MEDICAL MARIJUANA LAW STARTS JUNEAU, Alaska - Alaska's medical marijuana law goes into effect today, offering a legal shield to people who smoke the weed for a short list of medical ailments. Nearly 60 percent of the voters in the November election favored the measure, which allows marijuana use for ailments including cancer, AIDS, glaucoma, chronic pain, seizures and muscle spasms, provided the patient has a doctor's recommendation. The law allows patients to grow limited amounts of marijuana and protects doctors who recommend it. Growing, selling or using marijuana for recreational purposes remains illegal and marijuana is still classified with heroin and LSD under federal law. However, a bill introduced in Congress on Wednesday would set aside the federal ban on marijuana in the states that have approved its use: Alaska, Washington, Oregon, California, Arizona and Nevada. Although the Alaska law calls for identification cards that medical marijuana users could show to fend off arrest, the Department of Health and Social Services is not yet accepting applications for a registry of qualified patients. Even without a card, the law will provide a defense if people are arrested for using medical marijuana. Patients will be allowed to keep 1 ounce of marijuana, or grow six plants, including three flowering plants. "I would expect that the police would exercise some discretion, and ask appropriate questions that would allow them to gain enough information to determine if the person is legitimately using marijuana for medical purpose or just using it as an excuse," said Dean Guaneli, the state's chief assistant attorney general. Ned Tuthill wishes the law had come about a few years earlier. The retired airline pilot was using marijuana to ease chronic pain caused by a severe car crash when a neighbor complained to authorities about the marijuana patch on his property in Homer. Tuthill was placed on probation after a plea bargain that forbids him from smoking marijuana. "I have period of times when my pain is so severe that I just can't do anything," said Tuthill, 48, who says other pain medications nauseate him.
------------------------------------------------------------------- Fairmont State Baseball Coach Quits (The Associated Press says Donnie Retton, the baseball coach at Fairmont State University in West Virginia and brother of Olympic gold medalist Mary Lou Retton, has resigned after being charged with drunken driving and possession of marijuana.) Date: Sun, 07 Mar 1999 00:56:48 -0800 From: Paul Freedom (nepal@teleport.com) Organization: Oregon Libertarian Patriots To: Constitutional Cannabis Patriots (cp@telelists.com) Subject: [cp] Fairmont State Baseball Coach Quits MARCH 04, 17:45 EST Fairmont State Baseball Coach Quits FAIRMONT, W.Va. (AP) - Fairmont State baseball coach Donnie Retton, brother of Olympic gold medalist Mary Lou Retton, has resigned after being charged with drunken driving and drug possession. Retton, whose sister won gold in gymnastics in 1984, the broke the news to his players late Wednesday. But he did not tell them why he was leaving. ``It caught me off guard, shocked me,'' pitcher David Maust said. ``You couldn't see anything like this coming, especially with him.'' Police charged Retton, 33, with first offense drunken driving and possession of marijuana, a misdemeanor. Retton was pulled over Tuesday night after running a red light, said Police Chief Ted Offutt. ``It was a very unfortunate situation,'' said Dave Cooper, the school's athletic director. Retton also is a substitute teacher in the Marion County school system. Superintendent Thomas Long said any additional repercussions from the arrest are a personnel matter he will not publicly discuss. Retton took over Fairmont State's baseball program from Ron Whiting in 1996. The team went 20-13-1 in Retton's first season, including an 11-7 conference record. Last year, the team finished 15-22. The Falcons open play Saturday against St. Anselm, N.H., in Fort Myers, Fla.
------------------------------------------------------------------- Dopamine Apparently Isn't The Pleasure Chemical After All (An Associated Press article in the Orange County Register says a study published today in the journal Nature suggests dopamine, discovered in 1957, may not be the brain's only "feel good" chemical. Scientists trying to unlock the secrets of drug addiction may therefore have been off target for the past two decades. The report infers that the brain chemical, rather than being the key player in the pleasure process, is only a "messenger" and just one of several components of addiction.) Date: Sat, 6 Mar 1999 13:00:54 -0800 From: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org (MAPNews) To: mapnews@mapinc.org Subject: MN: US: Dopamine Apparently Isn't The Pleasure Chemical After All Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Reply-To: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Organization: Media Awareness Project http://www.mapinc.org/lists/ Newshawk: John W. Black Pubdate: 4 Mar 1999 Source: Orange County Register (CA) Copyright: 1999 The Orange County Register Contact: letters@link.freedom.com Website: http://www.ocregister.com/ Author: Alex Dominguez-The Associated Press Section: News, page 5 Brain: A study suggests it is only a messenger. Dopamine may not be the brain's "feel good" chemical after all, a study found, suggesting that scientists trying to unlock the secrets of drug addiction may have been off target for the past two decades. The naturally produced brain chemical, rather than being the key player in the pleasure process, is only a messenger and one of several factors, according to the study published today in the journal Nature. "It certainly says the picture is much more complicated than being just dopamine alone, and it will lead to the search for other chemical substances in the brain," said the study's author, chemist R. Mark Wightman of the University of North Caroline. Dopamine, discovered in 1957, came into prominence in the early 1960s when scientists discovered that several antipsychotic drugs targeted it. In the late 1970s, researchers began probing its role in drug addiction and found that cocaine, heroin and other addictive drugs increase levels of dopamine in the body. Since then, some scientists have tried to develop a medication that would cure cocaine addiction by blocking dopamine. The latest study is another in a series that have cast doubt on that approach. The researchers attached electrodes to the brains of rats, which produced dopamine when they were shocked. The rats were then trained to shock themselves. As the rats continued to shock themselves, however, the amount of dopamine produced by their brains decreased - even though they continued to seek pleasure by pressing the lever that electrically stimulated their brains. Dopamine appears to be related to "novelty, predictability or some other aspect of the reward process, rather than to hedonism itself," the researchers reported. What chemical or process is ultimately responsible for the pleasure is "not really clear right now," said Prof. Anthony Grace of the University of Pittsburgh.
------------------------------------------------------------------- Brain Chemical Dopamine May Not Be Addiction Key (A longer version in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer) Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 05:03:07 -0800 From: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org (MAPNews) To: mapnews@mapinc.org Subject: MN: US NC: Brain Chemical Dopamine May Not Be Addiction Key Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Reply-To: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Organization: Media Awareness Project http://www.mapinc.org/lists/ Newshawk: John Smith Pubdate: 4 Mar 1999 Source: Seattle Post-Intelligencer (WA) Copyright: 1999 Seattle Post-Intelligencer. Contact: editpage@seattle-pi.com Website: http://www.seattle-pi.com/ Author: Alex Dominguez, The Associated Press BRAIN CHEMICAL DOPAMINE MAY NOT BE ADDICTION KEY Dopamine may not be the brain's "feel-good" chemical after all, a study found, suggesting that scientists trying to unlock the secrets of drug addiction may have been off-target for the past two decades. The naturally produced brain chemical, rather than being the key player in the pleasure process, is only a messenger and one of several factors, according to the study, published today in the journal Nature. "It certainly says the picture is much more complicated than being just dopamine alone, and it will lead to the search for other chemical substances in the brain," said the study's author, chemist R. Mark Wightman of the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill. Dopamine, first discovered in 1957, came into prominence in the early 1960s when scientists discovered that several antipsychotic drugs targeted it. In the late 1970s, researchers began looking into its role in drug addiction and found that cocaine, heroin and other addictive drugs increase levels of dopamine in the body. Since then, some scientists have tried to develop a medication that would cure cocaine addiction by blocking dopamine. The latest study is another that casts doubt on that approach. The researchers attached electrodes to the brains of rats, which produced dopamine when they were shocked. The rats were then trained to shock themselves. As the rats continued to shock themselves, however, the researchers discovered that the amount of dopamine produced by their brains decreased -- even though they continued to seek pleasure by pressing the lever that electrically stimulated their brains. Dopamine appears to be related to "novelty, predictability or some other aspect of the reward process, rather than to hedonism itself," the researchers reported. What chemical or process is ultimately responsible for the pleasure is "not really clear right now. That's something that's a real topic of investigation," said Anthony Grace, a professor of neuroscience and psychiatry at the University of Pittsburgh who was not involved in the study. Grace said that even if dopamine is not the ultimate reward for the brain, it might still be the key to curing addiction. Some researchers now complain that dopamine's activity in the brain has been overstated. Alan Leshner, director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, has criticized what he called "the dopamine religion" among some scientists. Marc Caron, a professor of cell biology at the Duke University Medical Center, found evidence last year that the effects of cocaine are not solely controlled by dopamine. Caron created specially bred mice without dopamine transporters, and found they still wanted cocaine. Medications that block the transporters in humans, however, might be effective if they could block the desire for cocaine long enough to break the addiction, Grace said.
------------------------------------------------------------------- Role Of Dopamine In Doubt (The version in the Augusta Chronicle, in Georgia) Date: Sat, 6 Mar 1999 16:50:55 -0800 From: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org (MAPNews) To: mapnews@mapinc.org Subject: MN: US GA: Role Of Dopamine In Doubt Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Reply-To: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Organization: Media Awareness Project http://www.mapinc.org/lists/ Newshawk: General Pulaski Pubdate: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 Source: Augusta Chronicle, The (GA) Contact: letters@augustachronicle.com Website: http://www.augustachronicle.com/ ROLE OF DOPAMINE IN DOUBT Study Questions Previous Theory That Chemical Is Key Player In Brain's Process Of Producing Enjoyment Dopamine may not be the brain's "feel-good" chemical after all, a study found, suggesting that scientists trying to unlock the secrets of drug addiction may have been off target for the past two decades. The naturally produced brain chemical, rather than being the key player in the pleasure process, is only a messenger and one of several factors, according to the study, published today in the journal Nature. "It certainly says the picture is much more complicated than being just dopamine alone, and it will lead to the search for other chemical substances in the brain," said the study's author, chemist R. Mark Wightman of the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill. Dopamine, first discovered in 1957, came into prominence in the early 1960s when scientists discovered that several antipsychotic drugs targeted it. In the late 1970s, researchers began looking into its role in drug addiction and found that cocaine, heroin and other addictive drugs increase levels of dopamine in the body. Since then, some scientists have tried to develop a medication that would cure cocaine addiction by blocking dopamine. The latest study is another in a series that have cast doubt on that approach. The researchers attached electrodes to the brains of rats, which produced dopamine when they were shocked. The rats were then trained to shock themselves. As the rats continued to shock themselves, however, the researchers discovered that the amount of dopamine produced by their brains decreased - even though they continued to seek pleasure by pressing the lever.
------------------------------------------------------------------- War On Drugs Needs A New Battle Plan (Cox news service columnist Tom Teepen, writing in the Arizona Daily Star, notes the war on some drug users has failed, and discusses the proposals put forth yesterday in a report issued by the Network of Reform Groups.) Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 02:48:36 -0800 From: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org (MAPNews) To: mapnews@mapinc.org Subject: MN: US AZ: Column: War On Drugs Needs A New Battle Plan Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Reply-To: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Organization: Media Awareness Project http://www.mapinc.org/lists/ Newshawk: Alan Randell Pubdate: Thur, 04 Mar 1999 Source: Arizona Daily Star (AZ) Contact: letters@azstarnet.com Website: http://www.azstarnet.com/ Author: Tom Teepen WAR ON DRUGS NEEDS A NEW BATTLE PLAN A motley of would-be drug policy reformers clustered under an umbrella called the Network of Reform Groups issued a report yesterday in which they proposed, shockingly, that we stop simply fighting the war on drugs and start instead aiming actually to win it. They would do that by up-ending current, manifestly failed priorities, cutting the 66 percent of the anti-drug budget that goes to law enforcement to 33 percent and splitting the rest evenly between treatment and strategies against youth drug use. As matters stand now, only 22 percent of the effort goes to treatment and only 12 percent is targeted against drug use by the young. Granted, these are the usual suspects, long-time drug policy critics from a variety of angles (stop forfeitures, decriminalize pot and all that), but they make a strong, very sober case. It deserves a hearing. Alas, we seem instead about to go rampaging off again into more of the same, with the drug czar, the vastly unimaginative Barry McCaffery, telling Congress just last week that by turning up the heat, he'll cut drug use in half by '07. You read it here first: No, he won't. And House Speaker Dennis Hastert is setting up a GOP Drug-Free America Working Group. Do not expect enlightenment. Expect calls for more cops, more firepower, more and longer mandatory sentences and more prisons - in a nation that already trails only Russia in the percentage of its own people that it locks up. The relentless criminalization of drugs has mainly served - surprise - to create a huge, deadly criminal subculture around drugs. Despite already Draconian sentences, ugly interventions in drug- producing and drug transfer nations and a deeply corrupting quasi-war along the Mexican border, drug use among adults has diminished only slightly in the '90s, and use among teens has gone up a tick. Drug prices are going down and purity up - sure signs that supplies are plentiful. We are fighting this war mainly by taking ourselves prisoner. Drug convictions produced 85 percent of the huge increase in the federal prison population between 1985 and '95, in all a twelvefold increase since 1980. The result is a comparable increase in unemployables and devastated family formation. And because the most vulnerable drug activity is the indiscreet street traffic among and by the poor - and because poverty still disproportionately conflates with race - we are carefully assembling a social time bomb. By all means, lock up the big traffickers, but for most of the rest, a decriminalized, more medicalized model that emphasizes prevention and treatment would lower the social damage and, happy news, save money. A RAND Corp. study finds that alternative strategies buy more drug-use reduction per dollar than law enforcement does. At some point, even the dippiest fool figures out that he can't get through a brick wall by running into it harder each time he tries. Just how badly are we willing to bruise ourselves before we start looking for a way around this brick wall? Tom Teepen is national correspondent for Cox Newspapers. He is based in Atlanta, Ga.
------------------------------------------------------------------- Frank Supports Medical Marijuana (The Worcester Telegram & Gazette, in Massachusetts, notes local U.S. Representative Barney Frank introduced a bill Tuesday that would reclassify marijuana as a Schedule II controlled substance, meaning it could be prescribed by doctors.) Date: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 10:10:32 -0800 From: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org (MAPNews) To: mapnews@mapinc.org Subject: MN: US MA: Frank Supports Medical Marijuana Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Reply-To: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Organization: Media Awareness Project http://www.mapinc.org/lists/ Newshawk: General Pulaski Pubdate: Thur, 04 Mar 1999 Source: Worcester Telegram & Gazette (MA) Copyright: 1999 Worcester Telegram & Gazette Contact: tgletter@telegram.infi.net Website: http://www.telegram.com/index.html FRANK SUPPORTS MEDICAL MARIJUANA WASHINGTON - Congress should eliminate federal restrictions on states that allow marijuana use for medical purposes such as for relieving AIDS-related nausea and glaucoma, Rep. Barney Frank, D-Newton., said yesterday. "The irony is, of course, that many drugs much more harmful, much more powerful, much more addictive than marijuana can be prescribed," said Frank, who introduced legislation - as he has done twice before - to end the federal restrictions. Frank's bill, introduced Tuesday, would reclassify marijuana as a Schedule II drug, meaning that it could be prescribed by doctors under certain conditions, just as cocaine and other controlled substances are. Prescriptions for such drugs are subject to federal and state review. Alaska, Washington, Oregon, California, Arizona and Nevada have permitted medical use of the drug. While people using marijuana for medical purposes don't face state prosecution in the six states, they could still face federal prosecution, said Frank. Frank isn't hopeful that the Republican-controlled Congress will pass his bill. Last fall, the House adopted, 310-93, a resolution that said marijuana is a dangerous and addictive drug and should not be legalized for medical use. Supporters of that bill said to legalize the drug for medical use sends the wrong message to teen-agers, and that scientific testing has not proved a medical use for marijuana. But the New England Journal of Medicine has editorialized in favor of medical marijuana and the American Medical Association has urged the National Institutes of Health to support more research on the subject. Yesterday, Canada's health minister authorized clinical trials to determine if marijuana is a useful medicine for people suffering from terminal illnesses and other painful conditions. And a report from the International Drug Control Board concluded last month that in-depth and impartial scientific studies should be conducted into marijuana's possible medical benefits.
------------------------------------------------------------------- Abuse of Female Prisoners in U.S. Is Routine, Rights Report Says (According to the Washington Post, a report scheduled for release today by Amnesty International USA finds that women inmates in the nation's prisons and jails are routinely subjected to sexual abuse by male guards. The document also describes serious problems with medical care, including the use of shackles while prisoners are giving birth. Primarily as a result of the war on some drug users, the number of female inmates rose about 11 percent each year between 1985 and 1996, compared with 7.9 percent for men.) Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 14:05:54 -0800 From: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org (MAPNews) To: mapnews@mapinc.org Subject: MN: US: Abuse of Female Prisoners in U.S. Is Routine, Rights Report Says Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Reply-To: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Organization: Media Awareness Project http://www.mapinc.org/lists/ Newshawk: rlake@mapinc.org Pubdate: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 Source: Washington Post (DC) Copyright: 1999 Creators Syndicate Inc. Page: A11 Address: 1150 15th Street Northwest, Washington, DC 20071 Feedback: http://washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/edit/letters/letterform.htm Website: http://www.washingtonpost.com/ Author: Barbara Vobejda, Washington Post Staff Writer ABUSE OF FEMALE PRISONERS IN U.S. IS ROUTINE, RIGHTS REPORT SAYS Women inmates in the nation's prisons and jails are routinely subjected to sexual abuse by male guards, including groping during body searches and rape, Amnesty International USA found in a report scheduled for release today. The report details what is described as common practice: male guards touching prisoners' breasts and genitals during daily pat-down and strip searches, watching women as they shower and dress and, in some cases, selling women to male inmates for sex. The document also describes serious problems with medical care, including the use of shackles while prisoners are giving birth. "It is not an exaggeration to say we are facing a crisis in the treatment of women in prison," said William Schulz, executive director of Amnesty International USA. Todd Craig, a spokesman for the federal Bureau of Prisons, said the U.S. government has taken steps to address the problem in its facilities: 31,000 staff members across the country have been trained in preventing sexual misconduct and inmates have been trained in how to report problems. Also, 10 prison employees were disciplined last year and seven were prosecuted for sexual misconduct, Craig said. "It's an issue we have zero tolerance for," he said. While complaints about mistreatment of prisoners are not new, problems for women inmates have become much more critical because of the rapid growth in the female prison population, according to Schulz. The number of women in prison more than tripled between 1985 and 1997, rising to 138,000. That represented a much faster increase than the growth in the male prison population: The number of female prison inmates rose about 11 percent each year between 1985 and 1996, compared with 7.9 percent for men. That rapid increase for women is primarily a result of the nation's war on drugs, which was launched in the 1980s and led to much stiffer sentences for drug offenses. The number of women sentenced to state prisons for drug crimes, for example, increased tenfold between 1986 and 1996, the report said. But as the number of women inmates has increased, prison facilities have not kept pace in accommodating the female population. In federal prisons, for example, 70 percent of those who are guarding women are men. In Canada, by comparison, 91 percent of such guards are women. In 12 states, there are no laws prohibiting sexual contact between guards and inmates. Virginia's legislature approved such a law last week. Among the incidents cited in the report is the case of a prisoner at the Washington state Corrections Center who was raped and impregnated by a guard. In another case, the Federal Bureau of Prisons agreed last year to pay $500,000 to settle a lawsuit filed by three women who said they were sexually abused at the Federal Detention Center in Pleasanton, Calif. A Justice Department statement said there was insufficient evidence to prosecute. One of the women, Robin Lucas, said in an interview yesterday that she was housed in a men's facility, where she was attacked by a male inmate allowed into her cell by a guard. When she complained to authorities, the guard retaliated by allowing three men into her cell, where she was handcuffed, beaten and raped. "Then I didn't want to talk to anybody," she said. "I was scared to death." After her release, she and the two other women were able to secure changes in the prison system, including better training of guards and medical treatment for inmates who complain of sexual assault. In Florida, the state's Department of Corrections announced a new policy in January prohibiting guards from keeping inmates in their cells naked. That followed the suicide last fall of Florence Krell, an inmate at the Jefferson Correctional Institution in Monticello, Fla. Before hanging herself, she wrote letters to her mother and a judge complaining about mistreatment, including being observed by male guards when she was left naked in her cell. In 1994, a federal judge ruled that the D.C. Department of Corrections had violated the constitutional rights of the District's female inmates after 13 women filed a class action suit accusing guards of fondling and raping them, among other instances of mistreatment. The Justice Department has filed suit against the states of Arizona and Michigan, accusing them of allowing sexual misconduct in their prison facilities for women, including prurient viewing of women in showers, sexual contact and rape. A Justice Department officials said that while the suits indicate a serious problem, it is impossible to gauge how pervasive the problem is outside those facilities "because women inmates who are victims are often reluctant to come forward." Among the allegations in the report are accounts of medical maltreatment, including that of an inmate in Cook County, Ill., who was shackled to the hospital bed during 12 hours of labor. When she was close to giving birth, the doctor couldn't adjust the bed for delivery because of the shackles, nor find the corrections officer to unlock the shackles until moments before the baby was born. The inmate had been incarcerated for a drug offense and had no record of violence.
------------------------------------------------------------------- The Politics Of Pot - A Government In Denial (Eric Schlosser, in Rolling Stone magazine, devastatingly critiques the failure in the United States of governments and politicians at all levels to deal rationally with marijuana-related issues.) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 14:43:16 +0000 To: vignes@monaco.mc From: Peter Webster (vignes@monaco.mc) Subject: [] The Politics Of Pot A Government In Denial Reply-To: "Tom O'Connell" (tjeffoc@sirius.com) Organization: Media Awareness Project http://www.mapinc.org/ Eric Schlosser is becoming the most articulate and efective writer for drug reform on the national scene; in December, he had a watershed article on the incarceration industry published in Atlantic Monthly. This month, he's followed up with a devastating indictment of our contemptibly dishonest politics of marijuana, as practiced on the national level. Unfortunately, sycophants in the mainstream press will find this one easier than his prison piece to ignore because the source is Rolling Stone. Schlosser covers all the bases, his facts are well arranged and his analysis is non- strident. What makes his indictment so devastating is that he simply tells the truth. Tom O'Connell *** R0LLING STONE, MARCH 4,1999 Page 47 THE POLITICS OF POT A GOVERNMENT IN DENIAL, There is more and more proof that marijuana is NOT A KILLER WEED, and yet in Bill Clinton's America, the number of pot arrests has more than doubled BY Eric Schlosser IN THE CLOSING DAYS OF 1998, a number of events exposed the profound irrationality of America's war on marijuana. During the second week of November, The Lancet, Great Britain's leading medical journal, published a thorough analysis of marijuana's harmful effects. The Lancet warned that people who smoke pot every day for years may develop bronchitis; may face an increased risk of cancers of the lung, throat and mouth; may become psychologically dependent on the drug; and may experience subtle impairments of their memory. The journal said that marijuana should not be used by pregnant women, troubled teenagers, alcoholics, schizophrenics, people with asthma - or anyone about to drive a motor vehicle. But the editors of The Lancet argued that the dangers of smoking pot have to be viewed in a larger perspective: Marijuana is "less of a threat to health than alcohol or tobacco, products that in many countries are ... tolerated and advertised." On the basis of the available medical evidence, The Lancet concluded that "moderate indulgence in cannabis has little ill effect on health." A week after the Lancet article appeared, the FBI released the latest data on marijuana arrests in the United States. In 1997 roughly 695,000 people were arrested for pot - by far the largest number in American history. In 1992, the year before Bill Clinton took office, 342,000 were arrested. Eighty-seven percent of the 1997 arrests were for possession of marijuana, a crime that usually involves less than an ounce of pot. The cost of those marijuana arrests - not including the cost of any imprisonment after a conviction - may approach $3 billion. Under the leadership of the first U.S. president who has admitted to smoking pot, more Americans have been imprisoned for marijuana crimes than at any other time in our history. Twice as many people have been arrested for marijuana during the Clinton presidency as were during the entire presidency of Richard Nixon. Even though the rise in teenage marijuana use has sparked a great deal of publicity, the level of marijuana use among the general population has actually remained stable for years. Part of the recent increase in marijuana arrests may be explained by heightened police attention to "quality of life" violations. In New York, Mayor Rudolph Giuliani's "zero tolerance" policy toward marijuana has led to an eightfold increase in pot arrests since 1992. The crackdown on marijuana use also reflects policies embraced by the Clinton administration and the Republican-dominated Congress. Legislation passed at the end of 1998 escalated the war on marijuana, expanding the scope of workplace drug testing, funding research on new forms of biological warfare on marijuana plants and cutting off student loans to convicted pot smokers. The war on marijuana is being driven not by what the drug actually does to your body but by what it symbolizes. This is a war on 1960s counterculture, old hippies, non conformists and a wide variety of people the right wing has long considered "un-American." Twenty years ago the decriminalzation of marijuana was supported by moderate politicians in both parties. They argued that possession of marijuana in small amounts, for personal use, should be treated more like a parking violation than like a criminal offense. The rationale for decriminalization seemed obvious: The harms caused by the nation's marijuana laws should not be worse than the harms caused by the drug itself. In 1972, a bipartisan commission appointed by President Nixon called for the decriminalization of marijuana - a recommendation that Nixon flatly rejected. Nevertheless, eleven states decriminalized marijuana in the 197Os, and thirty-five others began to consider such legislation. The American Medical Association, the American Bar Association and the National Council of Churches endorsed decriminalization, as did President Jimmy Carter. In October 1977, the Senate Judiciary Committee voted to decriminalize marijuana. But the committee reversed its decision a week later, after strenuous objections by Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah. While mainstream American opinion favored decriminalization, the far right thought that marijuana posed a grave threat to the moral fiber of the nation. Sen. James 0. Eastland, D-Miss., argued that the "marijuana- hashish epidemic" was being spread by left wing "subversive groups" and that it threatened to turn America's youth into brain-damaged "semizombies." Ronald Reagan, then governor of California, shared these views and in 1972 vetoed legislation that would have reduced that state's penalties for possessing marijuana. During the i980 presidential campaign, Reagan took a hard line against marijuana, claiming that medical researchers viewed pot as "probably the most dangerous drug in America today." President Reagan's War on Drugs began in 1982 as a war on marijuana. His first drug czar, Carlton Turner, blamed marijuana for young people's involvement in "antibig-business, anti-authority demonstrations." Turner also thought that smoking pot could transform young men into homosexuals. Condemning marijuana became an easy way for baby-boomer politicians to distance themselves from the 1960s youth counterculture. It became a means of demonstrating their true "Americanism." As marijuana use declined across the country, there seemed to be little political benefit in protecting marijuana users from criminal sanctions. The War on Drugs increasingly began to resemble the 50s anti-Communist crusade - another government-sponsored witch hunt aimed at political non conformists. By the time President Reagan left office, in 1988, every member of Congress and every candidate for higher office had to anticipate being asked, "Are you now or have you ever been a pot smoker?" In 1981, Rep. Newt Gingrich, R-Ga., introduced a bill that would have legalized the medicinal use of marijuana. Fifteen years later, as speaker of the House, Gingrich sponsored a bill demanding a life sentence - or the death penalty - for anyone bringing more than two ounces of marijuana into the United States. Today the heirs to the Reagan revolution in Congress are setting the nation's marijuana policy. Republican Sgn. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and Rep. Bob Barr of Georgia, also a Republican, have consistently been two of pot's fiercest critics. McConnell has tried, without success, to inake the federal penalties for selling or possessing marijuana equivalent to those for selling or possessing cocaine and heroin. Barr has fought hard to thwart any government research into what he terms the "so-called medical use of marijuana." He claims that attempts to study the therapeutic value of pot are part of a vast conspiracy. "All civilized countries in the world," Barr says, "are under assault by drug proponents seeking to enslave citizens." McConnell and Barr both come from major tobacco-growing states. Although approximately 400,000 Americans die every year from smoking cigarettes, the two politicians have focused their energies on demonizing marijuana) . Uana - a drug that, in 5,000 years of recorded use, has never been credibly linked to a single death through overdose or acute toxicity. The newly elected speaker of the House, Republican Rep. J. Dennis Hastert of Illinois, has been widely portrayed in the media as a kind and well-meaning moderate. Little attention has been paid to Hastert's role last year as chairman of Newt Gingrich, s Task Force for a Drug-Free America. During the 1998 congressional campaign, Hastert led the effort to portray the Clinton administration as "soft on drugs." At a press conference with Gary Bauer, chairman of the right-wing Christian Family Research Council, Hastert called upon America to "kick this destructive habit" and later called marijuana a "poison." In response to reports that perhaps seventy percent of the players in the National Basketball Association regularly smoke pot, Hastert proclaimed a Drug-Free Athletes, Celebrities and Role Models week. That same week, his Republican colleagues introduced the clumsily named Professional and Olympic Athlete Responsibility Resolution. The measure proposed that athletes caught with marijuana be required to turn in the person who sold them the pot or face a one-year suspension from competition. The speaker's Task Force for a Drug-Free America did not have much effect on the 1998 election results, largely because the Clinton administration has worked very hard to appear tough on drugs. Donna Shalala, the most liberal member of Clinton's Cabinet, has led the administration's anti-marijuana efforts, assuming the moralistic role once played by Nancy Reagan. As a college student in the 1960s, Shalala smoked marijuana. As chancellor of the University of Wisconsin in 1990, she told Time magazine that "we see . . . kids getting into trouble with drugs, but it's nowhere near the range and depth that the alcohol problem is." As secretary of Health and Human Services, Shalala has changed her tune, focusing more on teenage marijuana use - despite the fact that American eighth-graders drink alcohol more than twice as often as they smoke marijuana. "Marijuana is illegal, dangerous, unhealthy and wrong," she has asserted at various press conferences and congressional appearances. "It's a one-way ticket to dead-end hopes and dreams." Shalala has worked closely with Senator Hatch on the issue of marijuana use and has further politicized the National Institute on Drug Abuse, an organization that funds most of the world's original research on the health effects of illegal drugs. NIDA is supposed to remain politically impartial and maintain scientific objectivity. At a 1996 press conference staged at the Jelleff Boys and Girls Club in Washington, D.C., Shalala surrounded herself with small children and inadvertently revealed how the war on marijuana has affected the spirit of scientific inquiry. "We're supporting a major research agenda," she said, 11 to deflate all the myths that marijuana and other drugs don't cause lasting harm." The new drug-war legislation, passed by Congress last October and signed into law by President Clinton, contains a number of the provisions advocated by the Task Force for a Drug-Free America. Total spending for the War on Drugs this year will reach $17 billion, an all-time record. Among other things, Congress authorized the spending Of $23 million for research on mycoherbicides - soil-based fungi designed in laboratories to destroy marijuana, poppy and coca plants, They are meant to kill these plants without harming people, animals or nearby vegetation. Many Republicans in the House and Senate believe this new form of biological warfare may prove to be -the silver bullet" in the nation's crusade against drugs, 'The whole scheme is reminiscent of the chemical warfare that was waged against marijuana twenty years ago. In the late 1970s, excess supplies of a military defoliant called paraquat, left over from the Vietnam War, were given to Mexico by the U.S. Government. Through a program subsidized by the United States, paraquat was widely sprayed from airplanes onto marijuana fields south of the border. But Mexican pot growers soon learned that harvesting their crop immediately after a spraying prevented its destruction. The program was discontinued in 1978 when the U.S. Public Health Service disclosed that smoking marijuana laced with paraquat could cause irreversible lung damage. An eradication program designed to wipe out marijuana growing instead shifted much of it to fields within the United States - as smokers avoided Mexican pot - thereby turning marijuana into one of America's largest cash crop~. The long-term consequences of spraying the new mycoherbicides are bound to be equally unpredictable. The Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1998 provides federal funds to small businesses that want to impose drug testing on their employees. The rise of drug testing has been one of the most extraordinary aspects of the war on marijuana. A decade ago about three percent of the Fortune 200 corporations tested their workers and job applicants for drug use; today ninety-eight percent of these companies do. Almost half of the nation's workers are subject to drug testing. Marijuana is used more frequently in the United States than all other illegal drugs combined. As a result, marijuana is the drug detected in the vast majority of positive tests. The drug tests administered by most large corporations and the federal government cannot determine whether a person is stoned; the metabolytes of marijuana remain in a user's bloodstream for days or even weeks after pot has been smoked. Someone who has smoked a joint on a Saturday night can easily fail a drug test the following Monday morning. The huge drug-testing system now governing the American workplace cannot reveal whether you have ever been stoned on the job. It only reveals whether you are the sort of person who likes to smoke pot. The current drug-testing regime blacklists pot smokers and prevents them from gaining employment, regardless of how they might perform on the job. Meanwhile, a person who downs ten shots of tequila every night of the week does not face the same denial of employment. Indeed, a recent study Of 14,000 employees at seven major U.S. corporations found that eight percent of the hourly workers and almost twenty-five percent of the managers routinely consume alcohol on the job. The Institute for a Drug-Free Workplace has helped Congress draft new laws to expand drug testing and has fought nationwide against state laws that restrict an employer's ability to test workers. Five of the twelve companies on the institute's board of directors are pharmaceutical firms that handle drug tests. An industry that did not exist until the late i980s now earns about $340 million in annual revenues. The Drug-Free Student Loan Amendment took effect last October. It denies student loans to anyone caught with any amount of pot. Existing laws already deny almost 500 federal benefits to pot offenders, including small-business loans, professional licenses, farm subsidies and food stamps. President Clinton's one-strike-andyou're-out law gives authorities the power to evict a person convicted of a pot crime from public housing. In at least twenty states, federally mandated "smoke a joint, lose your license" statutes now suspend a person's driving license after a conviction for any marijuana crime, regardless of where that person was busted. Being caught smoking a joint on the couch in your living room with your car safely parked in the driveway can lead to a harsher punishment than being arrested for driving drunk. Under the newly enacted student loan law, a person convicted for possession of marijuana can become eligible once again for a student loan only after one year, following the completion of drug rehab and two surprise drug tests. A second conviction for possession of marijuana leads to two years of ineligibility; a third conviction leads to a denial of student loans indefinitely. Convicted murderers, rapists and child molesters, however, remain fully eligible for these loans. Those who suffer most from the war on pot tend to be poor or working-class people. They cannot avoid prison by hiring costly attorneys and can be devastated by the loss of state or federal benefits. In 1997, Gary Martin was arrested in Manchester, Connecticut, and charged with possession of marijuana. Almost twenty years earlier, he had been severely beaten during a robbery, resulting in permanent brain damage, After the beating, he endured a series of strokes, which left his right side paralyzed. He developed circulatory problems and his left leg was amputated. Martin regularly smoked marijuana to relieve "phantom pains" in his amputated leg. After being arrested for possessing less than four ounces of pot, he was evicted from his apartment at a special housing complex for the elderly and disabled. None of the doctors or nurses treating Martin was told in advance of his eviction. They would have lobbied the authorities on his behalf. "Kicking this guy out of his apartment for pot," says Hartford Courant reporter Tom Condon, "was just pathetic." The offspring of important government officials, however, tend to avoid severe punishments for their marijuana crimes. In 1982, the year that President Reagan launched the war on marijuana, his chief of staff's son was arrested for selling marijuana. John C. Baker, the son of future Secretary of State James Baker III, sold a small amount of pot - around a quarter of an ounce - to an undercover cop at the family's ranch in Texas. Under state law, John Baker faced a possible felony charge and a prison term of between two and twenty years. Instead, he was charged with a misdemeanor, pleaded guilty and was fined $2,000. In 19go, Republican Rep. Dan Burton of Indiana introduced legislation that would require the death penalty for drug dealers. "We must educate our children about the dangers of drugs," Burton said, "and impose tough new penalties on dealers." Four years later his son was arrested while transporting nearly eight pounds of marijuana from Texas to Indiana. Burton hired an attorney for his son. While awaiting trial in that case, Danny Burton III was arrested again, only five months later, for his growing thirty marijuana plants in is Indianapolis apartment. Police also found a shotgun in the apartment. Under federal law, Danny Burton faced a possible mandatory minimum sentence of five years in prison just for the gun, plus up to three years in prison under state law for all the pot. Federal charges were never filed against Burton, who wound up receiving a milder sanction: a term of community service, probation and house arrest. When the son of Richard W. Riley (the former South Carolina governor who became Clinton's secretary of education) was indicted in 1992 on federal charges of conspiring to sell cocaine and marijuana, he faced ten years to life in prison and a fine Of $4 million. Instead, Richard Riley Jr. received six months of house arrest. In September 1996, Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham, R-Calif., attacked President Clinton for being "cavalier" toward illegal drugs and for appointing too many "soft on crime" liberal judges. "We must get tough on drug dealers," he declared. "Those who peddle destruction on our children must pay dearly." Four months later, his son Todd Cunningham was arrested by the Drug Enforcement Administration after helping to transport 400 pounds of marijuana from California to Massachusetts. Although Todd Cunningham confessed to having been part of a smuggling ring that had shipped at much as ten tons of pot throughout the U.S. - a crime that can lead to a life sentence without parole - he was charged only with distributing 400 pounds of pot. The prosecutor in his case recommended a sentence of fourteen months at a boot camp and a halfway house. Representative Cunningham begged the judge for leniency. "My son has a good heart," he said, fighting back tears. "He's never been in trouble before." Todd Cunningham was sentenced to two and a half years in prison. He might have received an even shorter sentence had he not tested positive for cocaine three times while out on bail. "The sentence Todd got had nothing to do with who Duke is," says the congressman's Press secretary. "Duke has always been tough on drugs and remains tough on drugs." IN 1973, OREGON BECAME THE FIRST state to decriminalize marijuana. Other states soon followed, including California, Ohio, Mississippi and North Carolina. A number of studies later found that states that decriminalized marijuana did not experience a higher rate of pot use than states with tough marijuana laws. In 1994, Republicans gained control of the Oregon legislature after forty years as the minority party and quickly set about toughening the state's marijuana laws. They hoped this would send a symbolic message to the state's youth. In June 1997, the Oregon legislature voted by more than two to one to recriminalize marijuana, with Republicans and Democrats supporting a bill that turned possession of marijuana into a crime punishable by a jail sentence. John Kitzhaber, the state's Democratic governor, reluctantly signed the legislation, unwilling to veto it and risk appearing soft on drugs. Drug-reform activists immediately began to collect signatures for a statewide referendum on the issue, arguing that the voters should determine the state's policy on marijuana. That signature drive yielded Measure 57, a ballot initiative on the recriminalization of marijuana. The state GOP, the Portland Oregonian and a group called Oregonians Against Dangerous Drugs supported a yes vote on the measure. State Rep. Floyd Prozanski, a Democrat from Eugene, was one of the few elected officials in Oregon willing to speak out against making marijuana possession a crime. A former assistant district attorney, he criticized the scare tactics being used by Measure 57 supporters and later warned, "If kids don't believe you about marijuana why should they believe you about other drugs, like crystal meth, which are really are dangerous?" No major political figure in Oregon advocated voting no on Measure 57. Nonetheless, on Election Day, the state's voters repudiated their legislature and backed the decriminalization of marijuana, by a margin of two to one. IT HAS OFTEN BEEN SAID THAT THE first casualty of every war is the truth. The American war on marijuana provides a fine example. No major newspaper in the United States has thus far mentioned The Lancet's conclusions about the actual harms of smoking pot. Last year another British journal, New Scientist, revealed that sections [of a] World Health Organization report on marijuana had been suppressed at the last minute. The U.N. agency's report had concluded that marijuana is safer than alcohol and tobacco; American officials at the National Institute on Drug Abuse called for the removal of those passages, claiming they would encourage groups campaigning to legalize marijuana. A subsequent editorial in New Scientist criticized "the anti-dope propaganda that circulates in the U.S." and called for the decriminalization of marijuana. More than a decade ago, one NIDA researcher told Scientific American of the constant pressure to uncover pot's harmful effects: "Never has so much money been spent trying to find something wrong with a drug and produced so few results." American voters seem to be moving toward a marijuana policy guided by common sense, not vindictiveness. Italy, Spain and the Netherlands have decriminalized marijuana, and their civilizations have not yet collapsed. A rational policy is not difficult to describe: Pot use should be discouraged without criminalizing users. Possessing small amounts of marijuana for personal use should no longer be a crime. Scarce prison cells should be reserved for violent and dangerous offenders. Much like alcoholism, drug abuse should be regarded as a public-health issue, not as a problem to be solved by the criminal justice system. After two decades of official lies, an end to the war on marijuana is unlikely to come from Congress or the Clinton administration. Any meaningful change will begin at the state and local levels, where initiatives give voters real power and where citizen activism can overcome the timidity of elected officials. According to Allen St. Pierre, executive director of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, decriminalization efforts are about to begin in Connecticut, New Hampshire, Arkansas and Illinois. This war is over, if you want it.
------------------------------------------------------------------- Ottawa to test medicinal use of pot (According to the Calgary Herald, Health Minister Allan Rock announced in the House of Commons Wednesday that the government plans to conduct human clinical tests to determine if smoking marijuana can reduce pain in terminally ill patients, a first step toward legalizing the drug for medical purposes.) Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 18:44:27 -0700 Subject: Ottawa to test medicinal use of pot From: "Debra Harper" (daystar1@home.com) To: mattalk (mattalk@listserv.islandnet.com) Newshawk: daystar1@home.com Source: Calgary Herald Pubdate: Thursday 4 March 1999 (Front Page) Contact: letters@theherald.southam.ca Author: Helen Dolik, Calgary Herald and Southam Newspapers Ottawa to test medicinal use of pot The federal government plans to conduct human clinical tests to determine if smoking marijuana can reduce pain in terminally ill patients, a first step toward legalizing the drug for medical purposes. Health Minister Allan Rock's announcement in the House of Commons on Wednesday was both applauded and panned in Calgary. "It's a good idea, and it's about time," said Dr. Nady El-Guebaly, medical director of the addictions centre at Foothills Hospital. "Let's test it. So far it's been a lot of heated debate and little science. I think it's high time we did a properly controlled trial." But Det. Pat Tetley, a city police drug expert who's testified at more than 500 court cases around North America, said products are available on the market that have the same or better results than you would get from smoking marijuana. "It's a placebo effect, or at best it's an excuse for a person to continue to smoke it because they've been smoking it all their lives," said Tetley, who's studied marijuana since 1979. "I think it's absolutely ridiculous to think that we would ever make it legal medicinally." Tetley said: "My heart goes out to these people who are afflicted with these kinds of diseases, who are suffering . . . But surely to God we can come up with something better than smoking marijuana to help these people out." Rock later explained that it should not be seen as a step toward legalizing marijuana use. "This has nothing to do with legalizing marijuana," he told reporters. "This has to do with the fact there are people in Canada suffering from terminal illnesses who have symptoms which are very difficult and who believe (smoking marijuana) can help." Rock said there is much anecdotal evidence from individuals suffering from cancer and AIDS who say the drug can alleviate pain and combats nausea, but no strict scientific evidence. The minister released few details of the tests, but said officials have been asked to set up the clinical experiments, as well as establish what kinds of patients would participate and look into how patients could be guaranteed access to a safe supply of the drug. A spokesman for the minister said it may take a month or two before officials draw up plans for the clinical tests, determining the size of the tests and the duration. Rock and Justice Minister Anne McLellan had pledged to initiate a national debate of medical marijuana more than a year ago, but Wednesday's announcement was the first concrete step toward legalizing the drug for patients. Pressure has been building on the issue in both Canada and the U.S. for years. November voters in six U.S. states joined California in approving referendums to legalize medical marijuana use. Bloc Quebecois MP Bernard Bigras plans to introduce a motion in Parliament today urging the government to take every step toward legalizing medical marijuana. Reaction from opposition members Wednesday was mostly positive, although Reform MP Grant Hill, a medical doctor, warned of risks if the testing was seen as a first step down the road to legalizing the drug for general use. "As a medical doctor, I have treated young people who were habituated to marijuana, whose (school) marks had suffered and whose lives were wrecked," he said. "But I'm open to compassion if marijuana is the only thing that works." Advocates say the drug is effective in reducing spasms for multiple sclerosis sufferers, epilepsy seizures, as a painkiller and in reducing symptoms of nausea which helps patients undergoing chemotherapy. Calgary pot crusader Grant Krieger, who has multiple sclerosis and smokes the illegal drug to alleviate his symptoms, applauded the government. "The cannabis plant is a very safe and effective alternative medicine, which is banned," said Krieger, 44, who is organizing a Compassion Club in Calgary to provide locally grown pot to people with serious illnesses. Two years ago, Krieger said he asked the federal health department for permission to do a research project and "they laughed at me."
------------------------------------------------------------------- Ottawa Approves Clinical Marijuana Trials (The Globe and Mail version, in Toronto, says the Canadian Health Department has already consulted with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration - which is also planning similar trials - about acquiring a supply of the herb for the clinical trials. Making marijuana available to patients by prescription will not require an amendment to the criminal code, a Health Department source said.) Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 17:27:09 -0800 From: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org (MAPNews) To: mapnews@mapinc.org Subject: MN: Canada: Ottawa Approves Clinical Marijuana Trials Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Reply-To: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Organization: Media Awareness Project http://www.mapinc.org/lists/ Newshawk: creator@mapinc.org Pubdate: Thursday, March 4, 1999 Source: Globe and Mail (Canada) Copyright: 1999, The Globe and Mail Company Contact: letters@globeandmail.ca Website: http://www.globeandmail.ca/ Forum: http://forums.theglobeandmail.com/ Author: Erin Anderssen OTTAWA APPROVES CLINICAL MARIJUANA TRIALS Study Could Lead To Legalization For Patients Ottawa - The federal government plans to start clinical trials on the therapeutic benefits of marijuana -- a study that could eventually lead to legalizing the drug for people suffering from diseases such as cancer, AIDS and multiple sclerosis. Health Minister Allan Rock announced yesterday that his department is developing guidelines for the trials to establish clear scientific evidence whether marijuana helps chronically and terminally ill patients manage pain and deal with other symptoms of their illnesses. The study would examine how the drug should be administered, and how a safe supply could be distributed to qualifying patients. "There are people who are dying," Mr. Rock said. "They want access to something they believe will help with their symptoms. We want to help." He said it hasn't been determined how long the trials will take or who will participate, but the study is expected to be a partnership between the government and private researchers. The Health Department has already consulted with the Food and Drug Administration in the United States -- which is also planning similar trials -- about acquiring a supply of the drug for the tests. Making marijuana available to patients by prescription will not require an amendment to the criminal code, a Health Department source said. The drug could be administered under an existing section of the Food and Drug Act, which allows for special access to prohibited substances. Anecdotal evidence that marijuana alleviates pain in some patients has been growing -- although people continue to face criminal charges across Canada even when they claim to be using it for medical purposes. That's what happened to Mark Crossley, a 38-year-old Nova Scotia man with an inoperable brain tumour, who said the government's announcement is "long overdue." Mr. Crossley was sentenced last week to four months of house arrest and 18 months probation for growing marijuana in his backyard. He said he received the sentence even after the court was told he smoked the drug to deal with the painful headaches and appetite loss caused by his cancer -- a practice supported in writing by his doctor. "They've sentenced me to a death, slowly and cruelly," Mr. Crossley said. "I've got three to four years left. [The judge] is not in a position to tell me what I can do with my health." Mr. Rock said his announcement is not a step toward a widespread legalization of the drug. "This has nothing to do with legalizing marijuana," he said, but added, "I think Canadians support on a compassionate basis, if someone is dying, access to a substance that could alleviate their suffering." An Edmonton doctor who specializes in pain management applauded the announcement yesterday, saying clinical trials are needed to set up national standards and study all sides of the issue. Doctor Helen Hays is about to publish a paper on a patient she studied who smoked marijuana to counter the symptoms of a debilitating and painful muscle disorder. "There was a tremendous improvement," she said, while cautioning the drug brings its own side effects and doesn't work for everyone. "We all need to know an awful lot more about it." Mr. Rock's announcement pre-empts a debate today in the House of Commons of a private member's bill from a Bloc Quebecois MP that asks the government to conduct studies on the issue. Stephane Bigras has obtained support for his motion from the Bloc, New Democrat and Progressive Conservative caucuses, as well as prominent medical doctors among the Liberals. But the idea is not said to be supported by the majority of Reform MPs. Reform health critic Grant Hill, a doctor who is against patients smoking marijuana, said he is worried about the drug becoming too widespread in its use. "Does the minister go down this road knowing how far it will go?" he asked. But Liberal MP Carolyn Bennett, who is also a doctor, said the medical community needs guidelines to resolve the dilemma. "It's been a shame," Dr. Bennett said, "that when there's something that really works for people they have to use illegal routes to get it." Doctors can currently prescribe a synthetic form of marijuana, but it is expensive, and many patients complain that oral forms of the drug don't work as well as smoking it.
------------------------------------------------------------------- Rock OKs Clinical Trials Of Medicinal Marijuana (The National Post version notes the health minister's announcement comes more than a year after an Ontario judge, Justice Patrick Sheppard, ruled that it was legal for Terry Parker, an epilepsy patient in Toronto, to grow and use marijuana for medical use. Sheppard said criminalizing Parker deprived him of his "right to life, liberty and security.") Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 17:27:16 -0800 From: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org (MAPNews) To: mapnews@mapinc.org Subject: MN: Canada: Rock Oks Clinical Trials Of Medicinal Marijuana Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Reply-To: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Organization: Media Awareness Project http://www.mapinc.org/lists/ Newshawk: creator@mapinc.org Pubdate: Thu 04 Mar 1999 Source: National Post (Canada) Copyright: Southam Inc. Contact: letters@nationalpost.com Website: http://www.nationalpost.com/ Forum: http://forums.canada.com/~canada Section: News A1 / Front Author: Joel-Denis Bellavance ROCK OKS CLINICAL TRIALS OF MEDICINAL MARIJUANA `We Want To Help' Dying Patients With Cancer, AIDS Allan Rock, the Health Minister, gave the go-ahead yesterday for clinical trials on the medical use of marijuana to determine whether the drug can help ease the pain of Canadians suffering from terminal illnesses such as AIDS and cancer. The Bloc Quebecois, which has led a campaign to legalize use of the drug for medical purposes, and pro-medical marijuana advocates immediately applauded the move. The Reform party was reluctant to give its support to clinical trials out of fear it might be the first step toward full decriminalization of marijuana. Mr. Rock said scientists from his department will gather evidence ``as soon as possible,'' and develop appropriate guidelines for the medical use of the drug, as well as provide access to a safe supply. ``There are people who are dying. They want access to something they believe will help with their symptoms. We want to help. Clinical trials would allow us to get research to know more about how we can help,'' Mr. Rock told the House of Commons. Grant Hill, the Reform's health critic and a medical doctor, said he is concerned the announcement could open the door to legalized selling of marijuana for recreational use. ``I'm open to compassion, and if marijuana is the only thing that works for a patient, I would accept that,'' Dr. Hill said. ``[But] as a medical doctor, I treated young people who were habituated to marijuana, whose marks had suffered, whose lives were wrecked. That's my concern.'' Mr. Rock was quick to dismiss the idea that Ottawa is moving toward wider legalization. ``This has nothing to do with legalizing marijuana. It has to do with the fact that there are people in Canada now who are suffering from terminal illnesses who have symptoms which are very difficult and who believe that access to medical marijuana can help with those symptoms.'' Bernard Bigras, the Bloc Quebecois MP who will announce today a cross-country campaign for the legalization of the drug for medical purposes, said he hopes police officers will no longer charge terminally ill people who use the drug to alleviate their pain. ``This is a step in the right direction, but the battle is far from being won. This is a question of compassion,'' Mr. Bigras said. Eugene Oscapella, a founding member of the Canadian Foundation for Drug Policy, which supports the decriminalization of many drugs for medical purposes, said Mr. Rock's decision was ``long overdue.'' Mr. Rock's announcement came more than a year after an Ontario judge ruled it is legal to grow and use marijuana for medicinal use. In December, 1997, Justice Patrick Sheppard said that Terry Parker, a Toronto resident, was deprived of his ``right to life, liberty and security'' by being charged with possession of marijuana. Mr. Parker had been smoking marijuana for more than 20 years to ease the severity of epileptic seizures. An appeal of the judge's ruling has yet to be heard.
------------------------------------------------------------------- Canada to test medical marijuana (The Ottawa Citizen version) From: creator@islandnet.com (Matt Elrod) To: mattalk@listserv.islandnet.com Subject: Canada: Canada to test medical marijuana Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 09:40:45 -0800 Lines: 102 Newshawk: creator@mapinc.org Source: Ottawa Citizen (Canada) Contact: letters@thecitizen.southam.ca Pubdate: Thu 04 Mar 1999 Section: News A1 / Front Authors: Julian Beltrame and Norma Greenaway Canada to test medical marijuana Rock denies trials are step toward legalization The federal government plans to conduct human clinical tests to determine if smoking marijuana can reduce pain in terminally ill patients, a first step toward legalizing the drug for medical purposes. Health Minister Allan Rock made the announcement yesterday in the House of Commons, explaining later that it should not be seen as a step toward legalizing marijuana use. ``This has nothing to do with legalizing marijuana,'' he told reporters. ``This has to do with the fact there are people in Canada suffering from terminal illnesses who have symptoms which are very difficult and who believe (smoking marijuana) can help.'' Mr. Rock said there is plenty of anecdotal evidence from individuals suffering from cancer and AIDS who say the drug can alleviate pain and combat nausea, but no strict scientific evidence. The minister released few details of the tests, but said officials have been asked to set up the clinical experiments, as well as establish what kinds of patients would participate and look into how patients could be guaranteed access to a safe supply of the drug. A spokesman for the minister said it may take a month or two before officials draw up plans for the clinical tests, determining the size of the tests and the duration. The government does not plan to change the Criminal Code for the trials, but will use a section of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act that allows the minister to exempt people from prosecution for special circumstances. The exemption is a sore point for advocates of medical marijuana use, who have complained that the minister had turned a deaf ear to compassionate applications in the past. ``We made an application 15 months ago for a person with AIDS who was literally starving to death and they did not allow it,'' said Eugene Oscapella of the Canadian Foundation for Drug Policy in Ottawa. He said the sufferer -- Jean Charles Pariseau of Vanier -- was advised by his doctor to take marijuana to fight nausea and stimulate appetite. ``If the government is sincere this time and that's a big if, then we're happy with the announcement,'' Mr. Oscapella added. ``I have a hard time understanding why we are not allowing responsible adult Canadians who have led responsible lives access to this potentially therapeutic thing that may reduce the pain in their lives, that may help them.'' Mr. Rock and Justice Minister Anne McLellan had pledged to initiate a national debate of medical marijuana more than a year ago, but yesterday's announcement was the first concrete step toward legalizing the drug for patients. Pressure has been building on the issue in both Canada and the U.S. for years and last November voters in six U.S. states joined California in approving referendums to legalize medical marijuana use. Bloc Quebecois MP Bernard Bigras plans to introduce a motion in Parliament today urging the government to take every step toward legalizing medical marijuana. Reaction from opposition members yesterday were mostly positive, although Reform MP Grant Hill, a medical doctor, warned of risks if the testing was seen as a first step down the road to legalizing the drug for general use. ``As a medical doctor, I have treated young people who were habituated to marijuana, whose (school) marks had suffered and whose lives were wrecked,'' he said. ``But I'm open to compassion if marijuana is the only thing that works.'' But some advocates of medical marijuana use were not impressed by what they saw as a grudging baby step by the federal government. ``It's a waste of taxpayers' money,'' said Terry Parker, a Toronto man who says smoking marijuana daily eases the severity of epileptic seizures he has suffered since 1963. Mr. Parker, 43, who in 1997 won a landmark court decision allowing him to grow and smoke marijuana for medical use, said clinical tests are unnecessary because the drug has already proven its value to people suffering from a range of medical conditions. Advocates said the drug is effective in reducing spasms for multiple sclerosis sufferers, epilepsy seizures, as a pain killer and in reducing symptoms of nausea which helps patients undergoing chemotherapy.
------------------------------------------------------------------- Marijuana health test backed (The Toronto Star version) Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 09:08:31 -0500 To: mattalk@islandnet.com From: Dave Haans (haans@chass.utoronto.ca) Subject: TorStar: Marijuana health test backed Newshawk: Dave Haans Source: The Toronto Star (Canada) Pubdate: Thursday, March 4, 1999 Pages: A1, A28 Website: http://www.thestar.com Contact: lettertoed@thestar.com Author: Tim Harper, Toronto Star Ottawa Bureau Marijuana health test backed Illegal drug to be researched for use by the sick, Rock reveals to House OTTAWA - The federal government will begin clinical tests of marijuana, the first step toward establishing a safe, government-supervised supply of pot for Canadians who need it for medicinal purposes. Health Minister Allan Rock made the surprise announcement in the House of Commons yesterday, a day before Bloc Québécois MP Bernard Bigras was to introduce a private member's motion on the same matter. According to some estimates, 20,000 or more Canadians would be likely to apply to smoke marijuana to ease the pain and symptoms of such debilitating diseases as glaucoma, multiple sclerosis, cancer, epilepsy, AIDS or arthritis. Canadians who are suffering deserve government help, the health minister said. The move was applauded by a number of medical organizations and activists who had been pushing for such action, but it is not expected to have any impact on various court challenges to the marijuana laws across the country. ``These are people who are dying,'' Rock told the Commons. ``They want access to something they believe will help with their symptoms. ``We want to help. Clinical trials would allow us to get research to know more about how we can help.'' In the United States, voters in seven states and the District of Columbia have approved the medical use of marijuana. Outside the Commons, Rock told reporters he believes Canadians will support the government's move. ``This has nothing to do with legalizing marijuana,'' he said. Dr. Don Kilby, director of the University of Ottawa's health services, said he believes Ottawa is sincere in its move and hopes it can quickly lead to a government-sanctioned growing centre. ``I want to make sure I know what my patients are smoking is safe,'' said Kilby, who treats many HIV/AIDS patients. ``I don't want them smoking just anything.'' Kilby had already unsuccessfully applied to Health Canada for a special provision under existing legislation to provide marijuana for Jean-Charles Pariseau, an Ottawa man who suffers from advanced AIDS and wanted the marijuana to alleviate nausea. Pariseau applauded the move yesterday, but said it was Bigras who spurred the govern ment into action. Pariseau said his disease has made it virtually impossible for him to leave his home. He tires easily, after no more than three or four waking hours, he said. ``Marijuana would help me to forget my pain and make my life longer,'' Pariseau added. Lawyer Eugene Oscapella of the Canadian Foundation for Drug Policy, a think tank which studies drug laws, welcomed the move, but said it was long overdue. He said Rock had the opportunity to help Pariseau 15 months ago and didn't act. ``It has become just plain cruel to deny this drug to dying people who could use this to alleviate pain and suffering,'' Oscapella said. Rock had been considering such a move for about a year and he signalled his intention in a newspaper interview last August when he said he planned to have bureaucrats put the wheels in motion for clinical tests. ``How the hell can we do a clinical study until it's legal?'' asked Terry Parker, the Toronto man who won a 20-year fight to use marijuana to treat his epilepsy in December, 1997, The Star's Jennifer Quinn reports. Parker said yesterday he is concerned synthetic alternatives to marijuana - which he believes aren't as effective - might be pushed by the government. Health Canada officials said independent research is now underway in California but it is not sanctioned by Washington. Clinical tests are also underway in Britain, but in some other European nations therapeutic use of marijuana is already allowed.
------------------------------------------------------------------- Canada Orders Clinical Trials Of Medical Marijuana (The Reuters version) From: CLaw7MAn@webtv.net (Mike Steindel) Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 16:58:17 -0800 (PST) Cc: cp@telelists.com Subject: [cp] Cannabis Studies Called for in Canada Content-Disposition: Inline Good News for Canada...Now if we in the U.S. could just rid ourselves of the oppressive religious right repuplican christo fascists in Congress maybe we to could get some relief... *** CANADA ORDERS CLINICAL TRIALS OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA OTTAWA (Reuters) - Canadian Health Minister Allan Rock said Wednesday he has ordered officials to develop clinical trials for the medical use of marijuana and to determine how to grant safe access to the drug. Rock insisted, however, that this was not the first step towards legalization of marijuana but an opposition member of parliament, Grant Hill, a medical doctor, immediately questioned whether it would not lead to more than pain relief. ``There are Canadians who are suffering from terminal illnesses who are in pain or suffering from difficult symptoms who believe that smoking medical marijuana can help with those symptoms,´´ Rock, a Liberal, told reporters. The debate has echoes in the United States, where voters in seven states and the District of Columbia have approved the medical use of marijuana over the strenuous opposition of the federal anti-drug czar, Barry McCaffrey. Dr. Hill, the health spokesman for Canada's opposition Reform Party, said he could go along with clinical trials but added: ''It's quite controversial, because it could lead to other things.'' Rock's formative years were in the long-haired, free-smoking sixties. Asked if he had smoked marijuana, the prime ministerial aspirant merely gave a broad smile.
------------------------------------------------------------------- Medicinal marijuana - background materials (The Canadian Foundation for Drug Policy posts the URL for House of Commons' transcripts and media reports related to the announcement by Minister of Health Alan Rock about the clinical trials for medical marijuana.) From: creator@islandnet.com (Matt Elrod) To: mattalk@listserv.islandnet.com Subject: Fwd: Canada: Medicinal marijuana -- background materials Date: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 09:19:06 -0800 Lines: 28 -------- Forwarded message -------- Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 10:11:35 EST From: Rileydm@aol.com From: eoscapel@fox.nstn.ca (Eugene Oscapella) House of Commons transcripts and media reports about the announcement by the federal Minister of Health that he has asked his officials to develop a plan that will include clinical trials for medical marijuana, appropriate guidelines for its medical use and access to a safe supply of this drug can be found at the following Canadian Foundation for Drug Policy web address: http://fox.nstn.ca/~eoscapel/cfdp/mar399hc.htm This site also contains links to research and other reports on medicinal marijuana. *** Canadian Foundation for Drug Policy Ottawa Tel: (613) 236-1027 Fax: (613) 238-2891 Canadian Foundation for Drug Policy Web site: http://fox.nstn.ca/~eoscapel/cfdp/cfdp.html
------------------------------------------------------------------- An Outpost In The Banana And Marijuana Wars (The New York Times says that when American troops in December helped destroy more than one million marijuana plants in the rugged northern regions of St. Vincent, the Caribbean island nation, growers were outraged. There is also a marked hostility against Clinton for waging war with Europe over banana trade preferences, the backbone of the legitimate economy. Some government and business leaders say the United States risks undermining its anti-drug efforts if banana growers turn to drugs - not just marijuana - as an alternative. At the very least, the banana issue is creating such deep resentment that it may compromise the willingness of Caribbean countries to continue cooperating in anti-drug efforts. "When Caricom countries meet in July, I think you'll see a bold statement of resistance," said Ivelaw Griffith, a Caribbean expert at Florida International University in Miami.) Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 06:58:23 -0800 From: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org (MAPNews) To: mapnews@mapinc.org Subject: MN: St. Vincent: An Outpost In The Banana And Marijuana Wars Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Reply-To: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Organization: Media Awareness Project http://www.mapinc.org/lists/ Newshawk: emr@javanet.com (Dick Evans) Pubdate: Thur, 04 Mar 1999 Source: New York Times (NY) Copyright: 1999 The New York Times Company Contact: letters@nytimes.com Website: http://www.nytimes.com/ Forum: http://forums.nytimes.com/comment/ Author: Mieyua Navarro AN OUTPOST IN THE BANANA AND MARIJUANA WARS KINGSTOWN, St. Vincent and the Grenadines - When American troops helped destroy more than one million marijuana plants in December in the rugged northern regions of this island, growers were outraged. They protested on radio and in front of government offices. They appealed to business and political leaders. They even started a petition drive to ask President Clinton for damages. "The Americans are not showing any real concern for our economic and social development," said Junior Cottle, chairman of a group of marijuana growers who described himself as "representative of the ganja man." Cottle said he did not grow marijuana but did smoke it. Marijuana is not legal here. But its production in the remote mountains has, American officials said, taken off in recent years, making St. Vincent the second largest grower in the Caribbean, after Jamaica. Growers said they were turning to the crop to deal with an unemployment rate that is officially 20 percent but that many people here say is far higher. The animosity directed at the United States comes from two directions. Residents have a feeling that Washington has abandoned this corner of the world, now that the Cold War is over and it no longer sees a Communist threat in the Caribbean. There is also a marked hostility against Clinton for waging war with Europe over banana trade preferences, the legitimate backbone of the economy. The nub of the dispute is that Europe unfairly favors bananas grown by its former colonies, including this onetime British outpost, where English is spoken and cricket is a favorite sport. The preference discriminates against American companies that produce bananas, the United States says. Officials here say removing the import protections would deal an economic catastrophe to countries that have little capacity to grow anything else and whose bananas are costly to grow. Some government and business leaders say the United States risks undermining its anti-drug efforts in the region if banana growers turn to drugs -- not just marijuana, but also trafficking in Colombian heroin and cocaine as alternatives. At the very least, some Caribbean experts note, the banana issue is creating such deep resentment that it may compromise the willingness of Caribbean countries to continue cooperating in anti-drug efforts. "When Caricom countries meet in July, I think you'll see a bold statement of resistance," said Ivelaw Griffith, a Caribbean expert Florida International University in Miami. Caricom is the Caribbean Community, the regional economic association. Marijuana growers here are seeking to anger the public against further eradication while exploring an agenda that includes promoting marijuana for medicinal purposes and pushing for job creation in fishing and nonbanana agriculture. The president of the Chamber of Industry and Commerce, Martin Barnard, said of the U.S.' stance: "People don't understand it. They're saying, 'What more can they do to us?' " Prime Minister James F. Mitchell, who asked for the mission in December, refused to see the farmers, telling them in a terse letter in November that his government was "firmly opposed to the illegal drug trade." Mitchell said in an interview that he would like to see even more American assistance to curb marijuana cultivation and the heroin and cocaine trafficking through the Caribbean. But he said he regarded the friend in drug control as a foe on the banana front. "We have a property-owner democracy, and that's what's been threatened, our quality of life," he said. American trade officials said that they did not want to hurt Caribbean banana producers and that there were ways to protect them like subsidies to bring down banana prices. At the University of Miami in February, the Clinton administration's director of drug policy, Gen. Barry R. McCaffrey, declined to comment on the banana problem, calling it "a complex issue." But McCaffrey said he did not accept the argument that "it's either this or drugs." "Nobody turns to marijuana or opium or cocaine production as a survival mechanism," he said. "They turn to that because you can make more money." But drug riches are not readily apparent at the house of a 39-year-old banana farmer who also grows marijuana and identified himself only as Nebo. He lives in the northeastern town of Georgetown, an hour's drive from here, in an unpainted concrete-block shell with two bedrooms and a family of seven. As the sweet smell of marijuana wafted in from somewhere around the house, Nebo said his 10,000 marijuana plants yielded an income that was at least 10 times the revenue from his three acres of bananas. Nebo said he had no reason to grow bananas anymore except that "it's in the culture." "It's been in my family," he said. "I just keep doing it. Right now I'm taking my income from ganja to support the banana crop. Ganja has been beneficial to me. It's paid for my house, schooling, food, the bills." Another banana grower in Georgetown, Iris Walker, said she and her husband would never resort to drugs. But she said marijuana farmers should be accepted as a necessary evil, underscoring the feelings of many residents. "It's illegal," Ms. Walker said. "But if some people don't do it, they don't have bread for the children." She called the Americans "selfish." Government officials said they were trying hard to diversify the economy to reduce the reliance on the banana crop, which is recovering from a slump caused by bad weather and low prices. Tourism in St. Vincent and the Grenadines earns three times as much as bananas. But officials say that the agricultural dollar goes longer because it is spent locally and that no industry can yet replace bananas in importance. Marijuana growers and their supporters say they stand ready to help. "We're ready to be part of the process," Cottle said. "The fact that we come out and talk illustrates the magnitude of the problem."
------------------------------------------------------------------- Simich Taken To Task For Marijuana Comment (According to the Dominion, New Zealand Police Minister Clem Simich was taken to task yesterday by a former undercover policeman for saying in Parliament that marijuana was harmful, while at the same time allowing undercover policemen to use the drug. Simich also had a novel theory to explain police perjury. The former agent, whose name has been suppressed by the High Court, claimed officers were required to smoke marijuana every day during their training to familiarise themselves with its affects and to build up tolerance. The former agent is a spokesman for a group of more than 50 former policemen who are claiming exemplary damages from the police for stress and addiction. A recent survey showed a 20 per cent to 50 per cent rate of drug addiction among undercover agents.) Date: Thu, 4 Mar 1999 03:53:56 -0800 From: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org (MAPNews) To: mapnews@mapinc.org Subject: MN: New Zealand: Simich Taken To Task For Marijuana Comment Sender: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Reply-To: owner-mapnews@mapinc.org Organization: Media Awareness Project http://www.mapinc.org/lists/ Newshawk: David Hadorn (hadorn@dnai.com) Pubdate: Thu, 04 Mar 1999 Source: Dominion, The (New Zealand) Contact: letters@dominion.co.nz Website: http://www.inl.co.nz/wnl/dominion/index.html SIMICH TAKEN TO TASK FOR MARIJUANA COMMENT Police Minister Clem Simich was taken to task yesterday by a former undercover policeman for saying in Parliament that marijuana was harmful, while at the same time allowing undercover policemen to use the drug. Mr Simich, in reply to a question on Tuesday by Te Tai Hauauru MP Tuku Morgan, said he firmly believed that people who used marijuana were unwise and were likely to damage themselves. The former undercover agent, whose name has been suppressed by the High Court, said Mr Simich was being hypocritical if he did not act to stop use of the drug among undercover police as part of their training and in the field. Police policy is for undercover agents to simulate smoking in the field unless smoking is unavoidable. A spokesman said yesterday that Mr Simich would not enlarge on what was his personal opinion, and could not comment on police operational matters. The former agent claimed officers were required to smoke marijuana every day during their training to go undercover to familiarise themselves with its affects and to build up tolerance. Agents did not simulate smoking marijuana in the field because it was "the signature of an undercover agent and they know that if they are caught it is a death sentence". He said some agents were making evidential statements when they were under the influence of marijuana and mistakes were being made. Agents were then forced to lie in court to cover up. The former agent, who is a spokesman for a group of more than 50 former policemen who are claiming exemplary damages from the police for stress and addiction, said a recent survey showed a 20 to 50 per cent rate of drug addiction among undercover agents. Police national headquarters CIB manager Detective Superintendent Bill Bishop said there were no plans to change the training of undercover agents. He said smoking was not taught, but "risk minimisation" was. This was supported by psychological and medical counselling before, during and after deployment. -------------------------------------------------------------------
[End]
The articles posted here are generally copyrighted by the source publications. They are reproduced here for educational purposes under the Fair Use Doctrine (17 U.S.C., section 107). NORML is a 501 (c)(3) non-profit educational organization. The views of the authors and/or source publications are not necessarily those of NORML. The articles and information included here are not for sale or resale.
Comments, questions and suggestions.
Reporters and researchers are welcome at the world's largest online library of drug-policy information, sponsored by the Drug Reform Coordination Network at: http://www.druglibrary.org/
Next day's news
Previous day's news
to the 1999 Daily News index for Feb. 26-March 4
to the Portland NORML news archive directory
to the 1999 Daily News index (long)
This URL: http://www.pdxnorml.org/ii/990304.html